tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post1386886923934901158..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: UPDATE - 21.4.17 MCCANN LATEST FAKE NEWS - NEW NANNYRosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger101125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-65553644710492172902017-04-24T00:04:42.594+01:002017-04-24T00:04:42.594+01:00Anonymous23 April 2017 at 19:44
Major T
The dad ...Anonymous23 April 2017 at 19:44<br /><br />Major T<br /><br />The dad who wet himself and had photographs ready to go viral. is there nothing some people are prepared to do for fame and adoration now..jesus aitch..only in America. The comment section says it all. Welcome to the U S of A.<br /><br />My Klingon isn't up to scratch I'm afraid, major. I'm prepared to take your word on the whole 'fat is a hoax' story, however. Let's go halfway..''the handsomely abundant lady has yet to clear her throat'' k ?<br /><br />I enjoyed the Mozart ; very relaxing. I came over all Clockwork Orange, and went hunting.Maybe I should have come over all 2001 Space Odyssey in hindsight. Damn that Kubrick..<br /><br />I can't find the stream of unconsciousness post..pass me the sat nav..ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-22112812419342840162017-04-23T20:28:50.687+01:002017-04-23T20:28:50.687+01:00Ziggmund
In my today’s post at about 19:31 please...Ziggmund<br /><br />In my today’s post at about 19:31 please read “…a stream of her consciousness…”, not conciseness :)<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-13005567267320593802017-04-23T19:44:41.273+01:002017-04-23T19:44:41.273+01:00Good parenting, a great man, also from the US of A...Good parenting, a great man, also from the US of A: “Dad Who Wet His Trousers So His 6-Year-Old Didn’t Feel Embarrassed Is A True Hero” http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/dad-wet-pants-so-daughter-did-not-feel-embarrassed_uk_58f9da91e4b018a9ce5a196f?utm_hp_ref=uk-dads<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-74078840626657217302017-04-23T19:31:45.863+01:002017-04-23T19:31:45.863+01:00ZiggySawdust 23 April 2017 at 15:07
“Anonymous23 ...ZiggySawdust 23 April 2017 at 15:07<br /><br />“Anonymous23 April 2017 at 13:08<br /><br />''Hoist by ones own petard comes to mind.''<br /><br />The fat lady hasn't even cleared her throat yet.Let's wait until she's sung her song.”<br /><br />No lady is ever ‘fat’, actually. (See The Klingon Dictionary of Wisdom. The commonly used English phrase is either an unfortunate mistranslation or a hoax) :)<br /><br />The wait has been over for quite a while: the lady you refer to did sing (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78KtEjdAszw). Listen carefully, comrade.<br /><br />T<br /><br />PS Good parenting, great man: “Dad Who Wet His Trousers So His 6-Year-Old Didn’t Feel Embarrassed Is A True Hero” (http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/dad-wet-pants-so-daughter-did-not-feel-embarrassed_uk_58f9da91e4b018a9ce5a196f?utm_hp_ref=uk-dads)<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-41308364572548380582017-04-23T16:08:27.557+01:002017-04-23T16:08:27.557+01:00Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton22 April 2017 at 01:11...Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton22 April 2017 at 01:11<br /><br />''Ziggy would have us believe that Gerry and Kate are naïve simpletons manipulated by the all powerful Clarence Mitchell and New Labour''<br /><br />Ziggy would state such if Ziggy thought it.He doesn't need words put into his mouth or his words twisted to fit. There's many a man or woman been silenced and kept still by the powers that be and they were of far higher a station than a pair of doctors.It isn't a question of being naive or simple.<br /><br />''Gerry and Kate have a sense of entitlement that overrides their senses of judgement and reason. They see their critics as beneath them, intellectually, socially and economically. ''<br /><br />As much as i enjoy the entertainment of mind readers, I think this particular trick is in need of some evidence. YOU assume to know what THEY assume because you want to assume it.How many times are you going to sing that song about them assuming superiority 'socially, intellectually and economically' ? When did they say that or what have they said or done to make you so sure what they're thinking ? It looks like another little list of things to hold against people you don't like. This, of course, contrasts well when juxtaposed with your other assumption that Amaral, is a polished intellectual man of letters who has been fed to the dogs by them. He has a sense of entitlement too wouldn't you say ? He thinks he's entitled to accuse and defame based on suspicions that failed to impress his bosses and caused them to move him off the case. His 'senses of judgement' led to the mess of libel actions that those who hate the McCanns have become addicted to. It's rare to even see the name 'Madeleine' any more.<br /><br />''As is usually said in a derogatory way, they are like those benefit claimants who know the system and everything they are entitled to.''<br /><br />But still think they need to employ the best legal brains to do their thinking. Comparing the McCanns, who you say assume that they are socially, intellectually and economically superior to benefit cheats is bordering on split personality territory.<br /><br />''They were campaigning for Madeleine's rights - and may their God forgive them for that one.''<br /><br />How dare they indeed..that's evil parenting ( again)ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-73330866348925836622017-04-23T12:56:51.211+01:002017-04-23T12:56:51.211+01:00Rosalinda 11:20
"There is no mention of nann...Rosalinda 11:20<br /><br />"There is no mention of nannies being given rape whistles"<br /><br />Bearing in mind the purpose of a dog whistle, you don't suppose....No, surely not. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83913168387579430352017-04-23T11:20:06.095+01:002017-04-23T11:20:06.095+01:00It is strange 18:59, especially as the McCanns, ce...It is strange 18:59, especially as the McCanns, certain elements of the MSM and the loony fringe of the antis have tried to paint PDL as some sort of perverts paradise or sin city for 10 years.<br /><br />There is no mention of nannies being given rape whistles - anywhere. As you say, 18:59, there is a whiff of desperation here. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-45541754341522421212017-04-23T10:27:22.598+01:002017-04-23T10:27:22.598+01:00Anonymous 22 April 2017 at 17:28
What a good post...Anonymous 22 April 2017 at 17:28<br /><br />What a good post! Many thanks.<br /><br />Best.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-38252816964498059462017-04-22T18:59:55.619+01:002017-04-22T18:59:55.619+01:00It's very interestingtesting to note that the ...It's very interestingtesting to note that the so called 'Rape wnistles'are not mentioned by any of the Nannies in their interviews with the Portuguese Judiciary.<br />They really are getting desperate now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-50642193352329591762017-04-22T17:28:33.116+01:002017-04-22T17:28:33.116+01:0015:39
"Lincoln was a great man"
Whose ...15:39<br /><br />"Lincoln was a great man"<br /><br />Whose name did not even feature on the ballot paper in any of the southern states at the time of his election to president, a fact to which those same states took singular exception, as they did toward the Morrill Tarriff, a levy they were expected to collect on behalf of the government but whose proceeds were intended to support northern industrialists.<br /><br />The emancipation proclamation carried no legal weight in those states at which it was directed, since they had already seceded from the Union. It did NOT pertain to slave owning states that had chosen to remain in the union.<br /><br />Still, not only would a re-design of Mt. Rushmore be v. difficult and v. costly, whose visage could they put there instead? Donald Trump's?<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ACGhgjLDf0Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-50339163852216964212017-04-22T15:39:41.018+01:002017-04-22T15:39:41.018+01:00Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton22 April 2017 at 01:55...Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton22 April 2017 at 01:55<br /><br />''I don't know what planet you have been on Ziggy, but never in my lifetime have I seen anyone that batshit crazy as Commander in Chief of the Free Worlld''<br /><br />Thankfully, a different planet to those who eat everything they're fed and go back to the TV for 'seconds'.<br /><br />Batshit crazy is waging war on countries under false pretences in the name of oil, lithium or opium or gold.It's being party to covering up contrived 'attacks' on your own mainland and sacrificing 2,000 of your own in the process. It's spending trillions on the Military looking for a ghost in a cave.it's utilising your intelligence agency to carry out assassinations home and abroad. It's excusing waterboarding civilians and soldiers as 'enhanced interrogation'.That's only part of the tip of the iceberg. <br /><br />Trump suggests 'building a wall' to keep out Muslims( terror threats etc etc). The sanctimonious throw up their arms at such racism. Obomber and Bush wanted to invade and slaughter Muslims in their own back yard and wreck the US economy( but not their own personal economies) in the process.<br /><br />Trump is loud, arrogant and none to bright.He's a Twitter president. He's shouting and talking. It's noise.He's far less dangerous than Clinton though.That lunatic has poison running through her veins .<br /><br />''you know absolutely nothing about history! Great men made great changes, that is why I get so vexed at those who make sweeping statements!''<br /><br />Me too. I particularly dislike the sheople's chorus.I used to get vexed but now it's just a head-shake or eye-rolling reaction. Great men ? Great changes ? That would explain why a succession of such has left us on a sinking ship as the 'great' captains man their lifeboats. <br /><br />Lincoln was a great man.He saw human slavery as immoral. He saw war as immoral as well as a bankers trick. He brought an end to the former and took a bullet in the head for the latter. JFK repeated history.All those great men that surround them in history have shown exactly why Lincoln and Kennedy were great men and why they had to go.<br /><br />''A great man is one who leaves others at a loss after he is gone''.<br /><br />''Love of glory can only create a great hero; contempt of glory creates a great man''.<br />ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-48625039161285408332017-04-22T09:27:11.584+01:002017-04-22T09:27:11.584+01:00Ziggys quote ,,,They are yet to be arrested in ten...Ziggys quote ,,,They are yet to be arrested in ten years. I'd say that's pretty successful, wouldn't you ?<br /><br />ziggys 2nd quote....There's thousands. Any criminal who commits a major crime and evades arrest would call that a success.Only those who end up doing porridge consider it failure.<br /><br />Notice the subtle thinly disguised difference.<br /><br /><br />ziggys next quote..... I haven't stated once, anywhere, that I think the McCanns are innocent or guilty. I've stated that evidence will decide it-not opinions, suspicion or gossip fomented by thousands who don't care that tangible evidence, eye witnesses accounts and judicial process is what puts people behind bars - not internet gossip .There's as much evidence for an abduction scenario as there is that incriminates the McCanns. None. Ask the PJ and SY.<br /><br />Hmmmmm, for someone who thinks there is no evidence of anything you spend an awful lot of time on 1 side of the fence ziggy (the mccs to be clear) and you even went as far as stating very recently that you believe the abduction story, now how can that be when in your own words there is NO evidence of abduction. I take it you believe it because k and G mcc declared it?????<br /><br />I put it to you ziggy that YOU are the one with the narrow mind, not I.<br /><br /> I dont skim read your posts Ziggy, I either read them or dont, im not always in the mood to don my waist high wellies to wade through them, their arrogance and tone amuse only sometimes.<br /><br />You wonder why people poke you ziggy, see above and see T comment above also at 21.22.<br /><br />As I said before, you shall tire soon enough Ziggy because you and I both know that FUNDAMENTALY at the botoom of it all (evidence or not) only 2 people are responsible for the situation MBM found herself in, the rest is just bullshit !<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-7200256549307637922017-04-22T09:10:05.964+01:002017-04-22T09:10:05.964+01:00@ Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton 22 April 2017 at 00...@ Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton 22 April 2017 at 00:14<br /><br />"I think all of us who have followed this case would vehemently agree, that there is and always has been enough evidence to charge the prime suspects. However, it is mostly circumstantial. As the McCanns and their supporters have said many times, the findings are not evidence. But I would question that - there have been murder trials where dogs have indicated death and no body has been found. <br />To me it seems as though the evidence against the McCanns is overwhelming - but what do I know? Is the onus on the prosecution to explain, step by step, exactly what happened that night, and indeed everything that happened to the poor child's body thereafter? How far does the burden of proof go?<br />Then again, we must counter in, the 'will' to prosecute and that's where it becomes all fuzzy and political. Back to musing, I have often thought, the unveiling of the Madeleine coverup would be buried under much, much, bigger headlines. Like 9/11, a good day to bury bad news. (a blooper from the incumbent government, but I can't remember the exact quote).<br />At the moment the entire world is pretty much distracted by two baby men threatening nuclear war, and out of nowhere, we suddenly have a General Election. With all this going on, not many people care very much whether Kate and Gerry 'dunnit' or not. "<br /><br />I don't know what planet you have been on Ros, but never in my lifetime have I read a comment that batshit crazy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-13203171561976319212017-04-22T09:04:19.137+01:002017-04-22T09:04:19.137+01:00@ Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton 22 April 2017 at 00...@ Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton 22 April 2017 at 00:14<br /><br />"I think all of us who have followed this case would vehemently agree, that there is and always has been enough evidence to charge the prime suspects."<br /><br />I'll excuse this daftness on the grounds that it was posted after midnight.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-6846258512317691592017-04-22T01:55:06.870+01:002017-04-22T01:55:06.870+01:00I don't know what planet you have been on Zigg...I don't know what planet you have been on Ziggy, but never in my lifetime have I seen anyone that batshit crazy as Commander in Chief of the Free World. If you believe Trump is no more evil and witless than 'those who sat in the big big chair' - then you know absolutely nothing about history! Great men made great changes, that is why I get so vexed at those who make sweeping statements!Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-78785088317438458842017-04-22T01:24:15.250+01:002017-04-22T01:24:15.250+01:00It doesn't matter what the Law says, Gerry mus...It doesn't matter what the Law says, Gerry must know in his heart that what they did was neglectful. Quoting high price lawyers doesn't make him sound any better.<br /><br />Gerry and Kate have given hundreds of interviews Ziggy, so the nervousness is a weak answer. Honest people eventually relax, Oprah for example had thousands of guests on her show, many ordinary people, who didn't sit on her couch as if they awaiting flames to engulf them. As for Gerry and Kate holding in their emotions - look at how that has worked out. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-86240924339353587332017-04-22T01:11:02.975+01:002017-04-22T01:11:02.975+01:00Oh Ziggy! Indeed, 00:05, ;)
Ziggy would have us ...Oh Ziggy! Indeed, 00:05, ;)<br /><br />Ziggy would have us believe that Gerry and Kate are naïve simpletons manipulated by the all powerful Clarence Mitchell and New Labour. Out of their tragedy, Gerry and Kate discovered they were formidable ambassadors and fund raisers with more neck than brass monkeys. What shell shocked parents for example, would think to put collection buckets all around the resort, and continue their holiday?<br /><br />Gerry and Kate have a sense of entitlement that overrides their senses of judgement and reason. They see their critics as beneath them, intellectually, socially and economically. <br /><br />As is usually said in a derogatory way, they are like those benefit claimants who know the system and everything they are entitled to.<br /><br />In the Autumn of 2010 for example when they were asking Theresa May to act on Jim Gamble's report, and desperately in need of funds, they stressed over and over that Madeleine is a British Citizen, she has the right to be searched for. (Apologies for the bad English there, tis late). They were campaigning for Madeleine's rights - and may their God forgive them for that one. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-88469064150076708832017-04-22T00:53:45.972+01:002017-04-22T00:53:45.972+01:00''Should this case ever come to trial Port...''Should this case ever come to trial Portuguese Judiciary will be up against the best lawyers money can buy. In 2008, with the prime suspects and the witnesses refusing to co-operate, the PJ had no option but to throw in the towel.''<br /><br />The best lawyers money can buy can only operate within the same parameters as the cheapest. Just because they charge top dollar doesn't mean that they can invent new laws or new legal protocol. If suspects refuse to co-operate that doesn't mean they can't be arrested. Prisons everywhere are full of convicts who say they 'didn't do it'.<br /><br />''I think all of us who have followed this case would vehemently agree, that there is and always has been enough evidence to charge the prime suspects.''<br /><br />There aren't any suspects, prime or otherwise, beyond twitter. What have the police been following ?<br /><br />''As the McCanns and their supporters have said many times, the findings are not evidence. But I would question that - there have been murder trials where dogs have indicated death and no body has been found. ''<br /><br />The police questioned it( or a few of them did) and the scientists answered. If we're citing trials, how about the Linday Chamberlain 'dingo' case? She received a life sentence and her husband was deemed an accessory after the fact. The court of public opinion didn't have the internet then so some turned up with T shirts proclaiming 'The Dingo Is Innocent !''. So they had a good day. A sort of precursor to 'Dogs don't lie!''. It turned out the dingo wasn't innocent eventually.<br /><br />It's up to the police first to hand the prosecution enough evidence that would satisfy them that a case was worth funding. The burden of proof goes as far as it needs to go. That is, if the charge levelled can be supported by undeniable, unambiguous evidence, it's done it's job and the burden then turns into guilt and is transferred to the accused.<br /><br />The 'will' to prosecute shouldn't take precedence over the duty to prosecute. That's why we have laws.But if the will isn't there then it isn't the police that should come under scrutiny. Those who don't want the case solved honestly may well, as you say, want it buried. That won't happen though. False flags are having less impact these days.More and more of the public are waking up to the games. They can't bury this one. They should have buried the media coverage years ago, then they'd have a better chance of making it go away. They've shot themselves in the foot now. There's probably about 3 or 4 scenarios being discussed. It should be interesting now that they know a lot of people are looking further than their noses.<br /><br />As for the two baby men etc..Trump is getting far too much attention from mainstream bullshitters. It's becoming trendy to have a Trump joke or observation.If the screwball resigned tomorrow a screwball would replace him. It's been happening since '63. Trump is no more evil and witless than those who sat in the big chair.he just lacks their finesse and PR skills. No president gets the final say anyway. Kennedy tried that.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-44213811736572742942017-04-22T00:43:26.198+01:002017-04-22T00:43:26.198+01:00I have no doubt there will be many people who were...I have no doubt there will be many people who were taken in by the McCanns, hook, line and sinker. That is, in the rush to assist the parents, the gullible would not, and could not, believe they were involved. <br /><br />You take way too much credit away from Gerry, Kate and their very assertive and pro-active family. Within days, Aunty Phil et al were running off T-shirts, sending viral chain e-mails, targeting large corporations and selling good quality wristbands. Not forgetting of course, the online shop for belt badges (as modelled by Kate on way to police interview)and prayer cards. <br /><br />None of the above were government initiatives Ziggy, and you forget, Clarence quit his government job to work for Gerry and Kate directly. He was the one flogging the TV interviews, the newspaper exclusives and the film and book rights. <br /><br />He was also controlling the news - stories and interviews would only be given to those who followed the rules - no criticism and no off script questions. Once you have watched enough Gerry and Kate interviews, you will realise that they say the same thing over and over, because they have had the same script for over 10 years.<br /><br />They can't vary it in any way, they can't add any more detail, they can't suddenly remember something as many of us often do. Any alterations to the story will kick off a chain of falling dominoes, because every statement is dependent on the next. <br /><br />I doubt Clarence has been inundated with 10th anniversary offers, especially if the McCanns are simply offering more of the same. It's simply not enough to compete with Trump's tweets and the lunacy that is about to break out in the UK. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-1719889929415077292017-04-22T00:35:57.711+01:002017-04-22T00:35:57.711+01:00" How far does the burden of proof go?"
..." How far does the burden of proof go?"<br /><br />beyond reasonable doubt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-22291895059283241692017-04-22T00:14:08.128+01:002017-04-22T00:14:08.128+01:00Oh they know alright 22:48, but the burden of proo...Oh they know alright 22:48, but the burden of proof in most countries (quite rightly) is so high, they cannot risk double jeopardy. That was, for example, the reason given for not prosecuting the parents of Jonbenet Ramsey. If the prosecution cannot prove their case, the Defendants cannot be tried for that same crime again. Ergo, they will get off.<br /><br />When the police do finally get the 'smoking gun', be it 10, or even 20 years later, they will go to trial. A suspect is never really off the hook, because someone will always be watching out for the moment they slip up - or that breakthrough in technology. <br /><br />Should this case ever come to trial Portuguese Judiciary will be up against the best lawyers money can buy. In 2008, with the prime suspects and the witnesses refusing to co-operate, the PJ had no option but to throw in the towel. And Gerry has been taunting them with 'noooo evidence' ever since. <br /><br />I think all of us who have followed this case would vehemently agree, that there is and always has been enough evidence to charge the prime suspects. However, it is mostly circumstantial. As the McCanns and their supporters have said many times, the findings are not evidence. But I would question that - there have been murder trials where dogs have indicated death and no body has been found. <br /><br />To me it seems as though the evidence against the McCanns is overwhelming - but what do I know? Is the onus on the prosecution to explain, step by step, exactly what happened that night, and indeed everything that happened to the poor child's body thereafter? How far does the burden of proof go?<br /><br />Then again, we must counter in, the 'will' to prosecute and that's where it becomes all fuzzy and political. Back to musing, I have often thought, the unveiling of the Madeleine coverup would be buried under much, much, bigger headlines. Like 9/11, a good day to bury bad news. (a blooper from the incumbent government, but I can't remember the exact quote).<br /><br />At the moment the entire world is pretty much distracted by two baby men threatening nuclear war, and out of nowhere, we suddenly have a General Election. With all this going on, not many people care very much whether Kate and Gerry 'dunnit' or not. <br /><br />May I ask 22:48, when you know something categorically, do you add the proviso 'think you know'?Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-26573694252603355852017-04-22T00:05:50.535+01:002017-04-22T00:05:50.535+01:00@ ZiggySawdust 21 April 2017 at 20:26
"Inadv...@ ZiggySawdust 21 April 2017 at 20:26<br /><br />"Inadvertently, you've asked the same question ['what puts them above royalty and heads of state?'] I've been asking since i began contributing to your blog."<br /><br />Oh, Ziggy! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-61735154441424582032017-04-21T22:48:08.022+01:002017-04-21T22:48:08.022+01:00" I have also watched many real crime documen..." I have also watched many real crime documentaries where the police know exactly who is responsible for the crime, but do not have enough evidence to prosecute."<br /><br />LOL. If they don't have sufficient evidence to prosecute, let alone enough to prove, then I would suggest you replace 'know' with 'think they know'.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-25395396116964612112017-04-21T22:39:44.524+01:002017-04-21T22:39:44.524+01:00Oh dear - criminal profiler doesn't seem happy...Oh dear - criminal profiler doesn't seem happy about the 10th anniversary effort that she has been promoting:<br /><br /> PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB 4h4 hours ago<br /><br />Rahni Sadler hasn't answered my email about the libelous edited clip used in the #SundayNight #McCann promo. Considering a defamation suit.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-45039941861159233972017-04-21T22:28:49.818+01:002017-04-21T22:28:49.818+01:00''Again, I remind you of the murder of Ste...''Again, I remind you of the murder of Stephen Lawrence, how many newspapers and programs have named his killers? Should they be presumed innocent until proved guilty. Should the government have interfered?''<br /><br />In an ideal world, all police officers would do the job they're paid for and nothing more, nothing less. But not all officers do. Too many are easily bought- or corrupt in other ways.<br /><br />In an ideal world, all politicians would do the job they're paid for and nothing more, nothing less. But not all politicians do . Too many are easily bought-or corrupt in other ways.<br /><br />When these two bodies get into bed together, ideals are kicked out onto the rug. That's a real comfort to us all. How many times do we hear, when officers have been caught with their proverbial hands in the till, that 'we are conducting our own internal investigation'. In other words, up yours, we stick together, as do the bosses, go and play.<br /><br />When the politicians order the police what to ignore, edit or change, it's done.They're playing for the same team. They're supposed to be serving the public and supposed to be transparent.And we're supposed to be stupid.<br /><br />When the police are conspiring to pervert or obstruct the justice they're supposed to have as their one ideal, the Government should interfere, yes. Such police aren't going to arrest themselves so someone should do something. It's in the public interest and the public have a right to know what goes on if they're paying their wages.<br /><br />https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/16/stephen-lawrence-inquiry-hunts-police-alleged-to-have-shielded-killers<br /><br />http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2293994/Gary-Dobson-drops-fight-appeal-conviction-Stephen-Lawrence-murder.html<br /><br />As for :<br /><br />''real crime documentaries where the police know exactly who is responsible for the crime, but do not have enough evidence to prosecute. ''<br /><br />If they 'know exactly' there shouldn't be a problem in bringing a successful prosecution.If they 'know exactly' how do they know ? Because if something tells them 'exactly' who a perpetrator is and what they did, it should show a jury the same.<br /><br />You don't always need a body to jail a killer.Enough circumstantial evidence will do the job if it's allowed to be presented ( pertinent to the McCann case maybe ?). Think of Helen McCourt and others.<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_murder_convictions_without_a_body<br />ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.com