tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post1471460865714525689..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: IS OPERATION GRANGE A COVER UP?Rosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger202125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-66777920907644485232017-08-29T17:24:22.781+01:002017-08-29T17:24:22.781+01:00This is a really good video if you want to watch a...This is a really good video if you want to watch a sex obsessed Baptist preacher and part time guitar teacher, adding perverse meanings to words and phrases, and labelling people paedophiles based on the result.<br /><br />No academic would ever do that, nor would any professional. Hyatt is just as much a charlatan as Richard Hall and Tony Bennett. And if the above is a video of Hall talking to Hyatt, have a vomit bag handy.<br /><br />Bear in mind, this is something Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-17612887022515497012017-08-29T13:19:04.149+01:002017-08-29T13:19:04.149+01:00This is a really good video with an Peter Hyatt pi...This is a really good video with an Peter Hyatt pioneer in statement analysis and spotting deceit, he really picks apart their words and how telling their statements were.<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWQTiXFmyoMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-31659744925208564692017-08-05T16:39:58.813+01:002017-08-05T16:39:58.813+01:00The investigation, in my opinion,became a show onc...The investigation, in my opinion,became a show once the UK influenced Portugal to remove their detectives and hand over the lead to them.That smacks of a cover up. Why they would cover it up is the only mystery.All that can be inferred with any reason is that the UK wouldn't send in MI5 and a couple of Prime Ministers to protect someone from Portugal.They oly act that fast and with that much attention to detail to cover themselves and each other-NOT two holidaymakers. There was far bigger more important matters to attend to back home( Blair seeing his term out, MPs campaigning to take his place etc).Would all that take a back seat to protect two doctors in the real world ? Even if anyone desperately clings to that theory out of a fear of seeing the parents as other than evil, it has to promote the notion that those covering for them see nothing wrong in throwing your child's body away like rubbish as long as the Brit's don't lose their mythological worldwide 'respect'.Bollocks for my money all that. OG can't be a self contained independent cover up of anything as they came in 4 years after the crime.It was already safely covered up. They're just playing their part in maintaining the illusion of 'police determination' for the press statements and media profits.They're scattering crumbs to the starving.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-65614734451682540452017-08-05T15:15:34.064+01:002017-08-05T15:15:34.064+01:00It's hovering around 50 /50 ( yes - 50, no /do...It's hovering around 50 /50 ( yes - 50, no /don't know 50). I think it's less a case of some sinister manipulation by someone who doesn't hate the McCanns properly and more a case of figures changing because votes come in after posts.The 50/50 might be 60/40 in an hour..who knows.It is what it is - a realtime virtual ballot box.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-21224960550603930842017-08-05T10:16:01.974+01:002017-08-05T10:16:01.974+01:00There is no MAY BE option in the poll.
35 people ...There is no MAY BE option in the poll.<br /><br />35 people think it is a cover up<br />23 people think it is not a cover up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-80011348641657027282017-08-05T10:11:41.799+01:002017-08-05T10:11:41.799+01:00POLL UPDATE
38 (52%) think OpGrange is NOT a cove...POLL UPDATE<br /><br />38 (52%) think OpGrange is NOT a cover-up or don't know.<br />35 (48%) think OpGrange IS a cover-up. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12269155984023052311noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-3873500536116240392017-08-05T09:21:10.710+01:002017-08-05T09:21:10.710+01:00If you think OG is a cover up then you must think ...If you think OG is a cover up then you must think that the current or even the previous PJ investigation is the same,there is enough evidence around not least in the FOI request mentioned up thread to show that OG is constrained probably legally to be only able to investigate what is contained already in the first investigation.Listen to Hogan Howe last year,"its essentially a Portuguese police enquiry".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-24963138876460882832017-08-05T07:47:59.380+01:002017-08-05T07:47:59.380+01:00You should work for the McCanns in manipulating in...You should work for the McCanns in manipulating information. Using your reasoning it's 48 think it's not a coverup or MAY BE not a coverup compared to 35 who think it's a coverup Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-41272875999172020822017-08-04T23:20:30.665+01:002017-08-04T23:20:30.665+01:00''Well, I think that goes two ways doesn&#...''Well, I think that goes two ways doesn't it Ziggy. You have your belief that the McCanns had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance..''<br /><br />Which part of don't ''don't fool yourself into believing you're a psychic'' didn't land ? Apart from you imagining I'm a McCann and part of 'dark forces' tying to undermine this blog before i have t shut down, you now see my thoughts and beliefs ? take some advice..before you start trying to invade other peoples heads out of boredom and obsession, sort your own out first, or get someone who can. I could do it, but no freebies. In the meantime. spend some of your boredom trawling the internet and come back with a single quote that has me saying the McCanns had nothing to do with their daughter's disappearance or that they did.<br /><br />''you ignore the findings of Eddie and Keela as if they never existed ''<br /><br />I've debated and discussed the Eddie and Keela story to death on other threads here.Find me a quote that has ME ignoring anything to do with them.The forensic teams were responsible for any reports regarding the validity of them. Not me. The questions I raised were addressed to those who refuse to accept the results and prefer to stay with the hypothesis that they proved guilt of a crime and evidence of a death.Basically, i wondered then, and do now, what their opinions are in that area.<br /><br />''many others go the other way and believe the McCanns are lying through their teeth.''<br /><br />I couldn't give a Donkey's bollock what 'many others' believe. Many believe that the tapas group were swinging paedophiles. Many believe Madeleine was used as a Lolita object. Many believe she was an experiment in cloning.Who cares what 'many' think when 'many' talk shite so consistently ? Many think Jack The Ripper was Queen Victoria and that the world is turned by pixies on a pushbike. It doesn't matter who you, me or anyone 'believe' were lying . It matters who the police of two countries believe. Don't blame me for pointing out the obvious.The state of play would be the same even if I said nothing.<br /><br />''So whose sense of perspective and reality is being crushed?''<br /><br />Not mine, because it isn't possible.Not yours as you have neither.<br /><br />Don't address me again unless you're lucid.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-68334965349199239942017-08-04T22:47:11.956+01:002017-08-04T22:47:11.956+01:00POLL UPDATE
48 (68%) think OpGrange IS a cover-up...POLL UPDATE<br /><br />48 (68%) think OpGrange IS a cover-up or MAY BE a cover-up.<br /><br />23 (32%) think it isn't. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-60272209265570643162017-08-04T20:10:55.356+01:002017-08-04T20:10:55.356+01:00Ziggy 4 August 19.29
"Perfect example of how...Ziggy 4 August 19.29<br /><br />"Perfect example of how allowing yourself to be consumed by an unhealthy obsession and the internet can completely crush a sense of perspective and reality. No wonder stupidity has become the most dangerous virus online."<br /><br />- - - - - - - - - - <br /><br />Well, I think that goes two ways doesn't it Ziggy. You have your belief that the McCanns had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance and you ignore the findings of Eddie and Keela as if they never existed yet many others go the other way and believe the McCanns are lying through their teeth.<br /><br />So whose sense of perspective and reality is being crushed?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-59627976852133922242017-08-04T19:29:26.995+01:002017-08-04T19:29:26.995+01:00Anonymous4 August 2017 at 18:20
''It'...Anonymous4 August 2017 at 18:20<br /><br />''It's an insult to Ros though, but I expect she is too aware that you trying to close down this blog. A tactic used many times by the McCann camp. If they can get rid of Brenda they can get rid of anyone.''<br /><br />Have you ever seen 'Poltergeist' ? That image of the little girl disappearing into the TV.I see that as the perfect image to represent the day you finally got sucked into the virtual world via your monitor.Walk into the light....walk into the light...<br /><br />''Although I expect Ros will take it as a joke, although her blog is being undermined by dark forces..''<br /><br />the light...walk into the light....<br /><br />Anonymous4 August 2017 at 17:52<br /><br />''Oh dear, Ziggy, you seem to have blown a fuse. ''<br /><br />No, don't be fooled by this darkness.It's only 'forces'.<br /><br />''Yes, I'm sure SY and the PJ have an explanation more important than yours and even if you are a McCann they won't be telling you what it is any time soon.''<br /><br />That's jolly unsporting of them.That's it, I'm getting on the phone now to call Uncle Gerry and Auntie Kate.( damn, you tricked me with your intricate mental dexterity)<br /><br />Perfect example of how allowing yourself to be consumed by an unhealthy obsession and the internet can completely crush a sense of perspective and reality.No wonder stupidity has become the most dangerous virus online.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-64664160695977112802017-08-04T19:07:32.959+01:002017-08-04T19:07:32.959+01:00The link works with both MS Edge and Mozilla Firef...The link works with both MS Edge and Mozilla Firefox. After the blog page appears on the screen, it takes a few seconds for the post to come up. I always check the links I post.<br /><br />You’ve got the wrong end of the stick. The fault must be entirely mine. Thank you for your comments and link nevertheless.<br /><br />Good wishes.<br /><br />T<br />_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _<br /><br /><br />“Anonymous28 July 2017 at 13:05<br /><br /><br />ZiggySawdust 27 July 2017 at 23:25,23:31<br /><br />Magic, comrade, magic! And a very nice one from ‘Ogie’, peace be upon him. Shame he did not tell his readers the “nature” of democracy and of utopian fallacies is one and the same. That’s what mixing Balliol with the wrong Krishnamurti does to one, comrade, but this you already know from my Big Red Book.<br /><br />Bright shines your conspiratorial lantern late into that good night. When you’ve taken over the world, you will remember the minor who called you the Rising Sun, won’t you. A backhander here and there never hurts…<br /><br />Thrashing and hurling insults at passers-by… Splendid! Right up my street! At The Crown once you’ve risen? Ties, tights and cleats?<br /><br />The day is beckoning.<br /><br />Respect.<br /><br />Comrade Tse”<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-35897087707749209392017-08-04T18:20:02.432+01:002017-08-04T18:20:02.432+01:00Oh dear Ziggy, 18.40 you just can't help yours...Oh dear Ziggy, 18.40 you just can't help yourself can you.<br /><br />What the hell has your comment to do with anything regarding finding Madeline McCann FFS -<br /><br />"I doubt Ros is up to the job of refereeing. She lacks the testosterone for the occasion.She can walk around the ring in something low cut and hold up the round cards.Then she can tend to your cuts. My good looks will remain intact.I learned many years ago that it's a bad idea to lead with your face.I'm not quite at Ros's ever so politely suggested 'gargoyle' stage just yet.I cut quite a dash in the dark.Half my face in a mask indeed..i'd only do that if i was Andrew Lloyd Webber. I'd do it for sure if it pulled Sarah Brightman(I loved that opera she was in 'Hot Gossip',Very artistic). But she came close with her suspicions.I just won't say which ones.She's an author so she can fill in the gaps ( when she's finished writing her dirty book)"<br />- - - - - - - - -<br /><br />It's an insult to Ros though, but I expect she is too aware that you trying to close down this blog. A tactic used many times by the McCann camp. If they can get rid of Brenda they can get rid of anyone.<br /><br />Although I expect Ros will take it as a joke, although her blog is being undermined by dark forces as all Madeleine blogs are eventually closed down, DS for an example.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83999611093474823182017-08-04T17:52:23.624+01:002017-08-04T17:52:23.624+01:00Ziggy 4 Aug 16.34
Oh dear, Ziggy, you seem to hav...Ziggy 4 Aug 16.34<br /><br />Oh dear, Ziggy, you seem to have blown a fuse. <br /><br />Yes, I'm sure SY and the PJ have an explanation more important than yours and even if you are a McCann they won't be telling you what it is any time soon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-55742464642820296672017-08-04T16:59:17.114+01:002017-08-04T16:59:17.114+01:00'' are you a fantasist thinking you can re...'' are you a fantasist thinking you can read the ins and outs of what happened to Madeleine and poo poo everyone else's idea of what happened to Madeline.''<br /><br />I take it your 'everyone else' have the facts then, and not hypotheses, imagined scenarios, suspicions and irrational, unfounded hatred.I have no idea what happened to Madeleine.I say it often enough in case some dickhead misses it and comes up with drivel like you just have.<br /><br />''You seem to be living in the shoes of the McCanns, are you a McCann, a relative or someone else who they know, ''<br /><br />And you call me a fantasist. I believe the appropriate online repsonse to that is ''lol'' Get a grip .<br /><br />''And why do you take so many paragraphs to say very little, you seem to be overwhelming this blog''<br /><br />You understanding very little isn't me saying very little.Don't be so scared of reason or perspective.<br /><br />''or is that the idea that everyone gets bored and gives up reading/posting. Is that a tactic in the McCann camp, I believe it may be.''<br /><br />Well, if you believe it, it must be true.It's not like you're ruled by a warped imagination or fantasy is it.<br /><br />Little tip ..if you see anything i write and you consider it to have no foundation or you disagree, feel free to express why you think it. Don't fool yourself into believing you're a psychic. Psychics aren't real anyway.Unfortunately, paranoia is.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-36209498678410374702017-08-04T16:40:02.956+01:002017-08-04T16:40:02.956+01:00Anonymous4 August 2017 at 14:40
Major Tea
Thank y...Anonymous4 August 2017 at 14:40<br /><br />Major Tea<br />Thank you for your Willy Wonka inspired tour around the surreal playground you call your mind. I find myself wondering sometimes if Salavador Dali and Viv Stanshall secretly had a weekend in Brighton once upon a time and you are the result.I can see you now, serenading Ros : <br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hcZ4s9cvpw <br /><br />( you're welcome)<br /><br />Liverpool Petal -good grief.In my youth i used to lay on the charm as a porter near the sea with all the old dears, who loved calling me their 'long haired lover from Liverpool'.It was a common occurrence to have a thrupenny bit squeezed into my hand for an extra dollop of jam on a cream tea( erotic smutty innuendo purely unintentional).But to compared to the great George is an honour.I could have been him but for constantly spilling my pint as i tore down the right wing trying to amaze.My clumsiness was football's loss...<br /><br />This invitation to arm wrestle....myself and Freddie Trueman of indoor league legend ( ''al sithhee'') are confused. You do this often; you post a link to somewhere on the blog but it only leads to a page rather than the actual post.Be more precise. We didn't win two world wars by posting vague links now did we.but, be warned..'I taught the hellhound to sit..Cheatin Satan playing cards..I taught the hellhound to sit...Cheatin Satan playing cards..I pulled a knife on the devil...When he damned my heart...'<br /><br />I doubt Ros is up to the job of refereeing. She lacks the testosterone for the occasion.She can walk around the ring in something low cut and hold up the round cards.Then she can tend to your cuts. My good looks will remain intact.I learned many years ago that it's a bad idea to lead with your face.I'm not quite at Ros's ever so politely suggested 'gargoyle' stage just yet.I cut quite a dash in the dark.Half my face in a mask indeed..i'd only do that if i was Andrew Lloyd Webber. I'd do it for sure if it pulled Sarah Brightman(I loved that opera she was in 'Hot Gossip',Very artistic). But she came close with her suspicions.I just won't say which ones.She's an author so she can fill in the gaps ( when she's finished writing her dirty book)<br /><br />So, Major..can you clarify your earlier request please....<br /><br />(Well, bring on that hooded bugler..he can sound his taps for me..bring on that hooded bugler, he can sound his taps for me..but when the reaper comes..he best be packin' heat)<br /><br />ZiggerZagger<br /><br />ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-41000741992498635622017-08-04T16:34:50.691+01:002017-08-04T16:34:50.691+01:00Anonymous4 August 2017 at 15:10
''Perhaps...Anonymous4 August 2017 at 15:10<br /><br />''Perhaps Ziggy could give us one of his very long explanations, or maybe not on second thoughts.''<br /><br />Yes, go with with your second thoughts.Your first ones resemble a delightful tableau from an episode of Dexter.I'm sure that the PJ files and Sy have an explanation more important than mine.Or perhaps you could demand explanations from them both as to what happened to their eyesight regarding that scene. Or what happened to the scientists judgement.After all, it wasn't me who rejected any findings.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-22614576755838480692017-08-04T15:37:25.254+01:002017-08-04T15:37:25.254+01:00Ziggy 4 August 00.36 said -
It takes a blend of e...Ziggy 4 August 00.36 said -<br /><br />It takes a blend of empathy and imagination to place yourself into the mindset of a parent who has lost her toddler only hours earlier.The fear, panic and doubt and a thousand horrific scenarios must be fighting to get to the front.Speculation, speculation, speculation.It's all a parent has.Fearing the worst is natural but that one is forced to the back. It would be easier to stay sane imagining a couple had snatched her as it leaves a possibility of a return.Yvonne Martin found all of this 'strange' though. Unusual for someone who worked for CPS.<br /><br />Eventually DP politely sent her packing and she got no information( even though she was only there to 'help'). She later identified the man who sent her packing vaguely as someone she may have recognised from her past professionally as a 'witness or a suspect'.<br /><br />- - - - - - - - - - -<br /><br />You seem to be living in the shoes of the McCanns, are you a McCann, a relative or someone else who they know, or are you a fantasist thinking you can read the ins and outs of what happened to Madeleine and poo poo everyone else's idea of what happened to Madeline.<br /><br />And why do you take so many paragraphs to say very little, you seem to be overwhelming this blog, or is that the idea that everyone gets bored and gives up reading/posting. Is that a tactic in the McCann camp, I believe it may be.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-36069936128985700362017-08-04T15:25:43.483+01:002017-08-04T15:25:43.483+01:00LOL TEA, I feel as though I have wandered into the...LOL TEA, I feel as though I have wandered into the drawing room of one of young Bertie Wooster's more eccentric Uncles, ha ha. I have to admit, I have great admiration for those who can offend with such courtesy and good grace. It totally confuses the opposition. <br /><br />As for Ziggy's good looks - how would we know? He may be a complete gargoyle, or living in the basement of an opera house with half his face covered in a mask? He sounds kinda matey and a regular kind of guy, but for all we know he could be stroking a hairless cat and chucking his minions into piranha pools, though I doubt it. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-81619215370311095352017-08-04T15:25:33.990+01:002017-08-04T15:25:33.990+01:00Hi John
That's what I mean.She knows the proto...Hi John<br />That's what I mean.She knows the protocol if there's a 'suspicious character' in her line of work.But ten years later, the seeds she planted are still bearing fruit- albeit online where the lunatics live. Gaspar's statement was in hindsight and possibly informed more by suspicion and fear rather than reason. To put it in perspective and hopefully clarify why they're unreliable, here's the highlights;<br />( Gaspar wife)<br /><br />''I was sitting between Dave and Gerry whom I believe were both talking about Madeleine. I don't remember the conversation in its entirety, but it seemed they were discussing a possible scenario. I remember Dave telling Gerry something like ?she?, referring to Madeleine, ?would do this?.''<br /><br />Key words : 'i believe' ' i don't remember' 'possible scenario''<br /><br />''I remember that I was shocked at this, and looked at Gerry, and also at Dave, to see their reactions. ''<br /><br />Which were ?<br /><br />''Apart from this, I remember that Dave did the same thing once again. When I refer to this, I want to mention again that it was during a conversation, in which he was talking about an imaginary situation, though I could not say precisely what it was about.''<br /><br />How many red flags does she need if it's possible or realistic that the subject was that of a child ?<br /><br />''I believe that he was talking about his own daughter, L., though I'm not certain''<br /><br />key words : 'believe' 'not certain'. This time the same sexually provocative gesture was recorded as being performed by a completely different toddler.<br /><br />''I am absolutely certain that he said what he said and that he made the gestures I referred to, but that could have occurred in the restaurant in Leicester, even though (page five) I believe that it was later on''<br /><br />I think if anyone witnessed what they consider a an adult discussing sexuality from a toddler, they'd remember where they were when it happened.<br /><br />''I remember thinking whether he looked at the girls in a different way from me or from the others. I imagined that maybe he had visited Internet sites related to small children. In short, I thought that he might be interested in child pornography on the internet.''<br /><br />How's that for a leap of imagination ?<br /><br />Gaspar husband :<br /><br />''I do not remember the context of the conversation between David and Gerry, but I do remember seeing David use his left index finger to rub his nipple''<br />''I remember that when I saw this gesture I immediately thought it to be in very bad taste, independently of the context of the conversation they were having''<br /><br />Good point.But the 'context' is quite important nonetheless.<br /><br />''I can say that Dave was a pleasant person. I do not remember him having any unusual characteristics''<br /><br />What about his unconventional table manners.<br /><br />''During the holidays Dave never behaved in an inappropriate manner with Madeleine or with any of the other children. Dave was popular with the children and I took this to be because he was a close friend to the family.''<br /><br />So they had no fears or kept no distance then. <br /><br />''It was during the days following the news of the abduction that we discovered that Fiona and David Payne were also with them in Portugal.....It was at this moment that Katherina showed concern at the gesture made by Dave in Majorca in 2005''<br /><br />Mrs Leapy imagination again.<br /><br />''At the time I did not feel the gesture was referring to Madeleine.''<br /><br />Because her name was never mentioned.<br /><br />This all adds up to suspicion, fear , panic and imagination versus reason.And these two are married so not on any 'side'.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-41183860296973484562017-08-04T15:10:23.662+01:002017-08-04T15:10:23.662+01:00Just to add - the findings of Eddie and Keela can&...Just to add - the findings of Eddie and Keela can't be ignored either. Or the blood splashes up the walls behind the sofa, and the fact that the sofa had been pushed against the wall under the window, where indications were noted by the blood dog on the floor. Where do they fit in this jigsaw puzzle. Perhaps Ziggy could give us one of his very long explanations, or maybe not on second thoughts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-58585848702389689782017-08-04T14:40:13.684+01:002017-08-04T14:40:13.684+01:00Ziggmund
Wonderful footwork once again, comrade! ...Ziggmund<br /><br />Wonderful footwork once again, comrade! Zig, zag, zig, zag. Such speed, agility and control! You never fail to amaze! Reminds me of George’s… Loved him… But, as the song goes, “If you cannot be with the one you love, honey, love the one you are with”. And that’s where you come in, my Liverpool petal.<br /><br />Glad you’ve dropped the habit of biting what others want you to chew. Always be careful with fishes, unless the food parcel is from <i>Stanza della Segnatura</i> or from Yeshu Ha-Notzri (Bulgakov or Book of the Strong Hand, take you pick).<br /><br />Talking of strength. Regrettably, you seem to have missed my invitation to a ball (previous thread, 28 July 2017 at 13:05 http://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/the-cruelty-of-madeleine-myths.html?showComment=1501243533930#c6000706688337998813 ). We could add arm wrestling (and discuss your mistakes while we are at it) and a spitting match to what I proposed therein. I’ve been pumping Iron. Get your guns ready and don’t shed tears when you see mine. Unbridled violence suits me fine should I find you in one of your finer ‘unpoetic’ moments. Come on, come on, toy boy!!!<br /><br />In the meantime, I’ll do my utmost to entice Rosalinda to referee, she is not a violent lady as we know. A bottle of ‘the merry widow’, Clicquot, on the table, Rosalinda likes it pink. Not to mention your good looks.<br /><br />As to your latest epiphany, remember what I’ve been telling you: legs aren’t everything: you have your head to eat with. And stop shaving your legs, it ain’t hot no more.<br /><br />Thank you for the “T”, Your Grace. Just in time. Much appreciated.<br /><br />Solemnly<br /><br />TEA<br /><br />I hear you didn’t turn up to face Deep Blue the Younger. Ignominy for Liverpool, Your Grace! How is you prepping for the <i>trivium</i> going? Logic in particular?<br /><br />No impropriety, offence etc. intended. (Just in case) <br /><br />Peace.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-23521401612325874752017-08-04T13:21:34.242+01:002017-08-04T13:21:34.242+01:00@Anonymous at 09:23.
Well said.
@Unknown at 08:53...@Anonymous at 09:23.<br />Well said.<br /><br />@Unknown at 08:53<br />Nobody posts on her referring to "imagined deviant sex lives of real people". Some posts refer to the PJ files. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-50342093177941587202017-08-04T09:23:43.474+01:002017-08-04T09:23:43.474+01:00To Ros
(August 2017 at 23:17)
I was going to write...To Ros<br />(August 2017 at 23:17)<br />I was going to write to you about this and commend you (and here) for allowing a platform for everyone.<br />The Facebook forums are partisan mono-themed: CMOMM and Hideho both "toe-the-line-or-sod-off" lecture dens, MMM great for knitting patterns, the Twitter Mc hash tag a pointless hate-fest that goes nowhere.<br />Here is Goldilocks' porridge. Everyone DOES get a say, a chance to reply, to opine and offer up what they think. You don't let it get like Twitter whilst allowing your own opinions to be challenged. Right now it is the only active place on line to debate every aspect of this case, hence the increased daily footfall.<br />Good on you for allowing criticism as well as praise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com