tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post2735303927437633089..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: HAPPY NEW YEARRosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger67125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83672086875006714302017-03-14T20:23:24.910+00:002017-03-14T20:23:24.910+00:00A slobbering letch with bad hair chasing scantily ...A slobbering letch with bad hair chasing scantily clad lingerie models - that's a bit hard on Bill Clinton! Maybe Trump will be a disaster, but maybe he will do some good: cut funding for Planned Parenthood, keep men out of women's bathrooms, sort out the economy, rebuild relations with Russia.Steghorn21https://www.blogger.com/profile/13579646340243788933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83091523387194145632017-01-06T15:53:35.578+00:002017-01-06T15:53:35.578+00:00It was actually quite straightforward.
..ChezIt was actually quite straightforward.<br /><br />..ChezAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-76459463503601666252017-01-06T15:19:07.423+00:002017-01-06T15:19:07.423+00:00@chez
It's hard to counter such a well structu...@chez<br />It's hard to counter such a well structured argument i suppose (...)ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83502718768597755582017-01-06T14:21:19.633+00:002017-01-06T14:21:19.633+00:00[It's simple really, more than a couple of ...[It's simple really, more than a couple of 'suits' sat down and said "OK..how do we make this unsolvable ?"]<br /><br />Too, too silly.<br /><br />...Chez<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-68177548425326925092017-01-06T11:50:38.216+00:002017-01-06T11:50:38.216+00:00There's a back catalogue of pretty huge propor...There's a back catalogue of pretty huge proportions filled with unsolved crimes. More often than not, it's because there was no eye witnesses, no forensic evidence and no identifiable modus operandi to use as a possible frame of reference. If the crime doesn't appear to be replicated thereafter it goes cold and stays cold.<br /><br />There's an impressively large amount of unsolved crimes due to them being dismissed by unwilling police forces or police forces that have been told to dismiss it ( Savile is a mere tip of an iceberg). The case of importance here, is the McCann one. Is that unsolved because the police were told to dismiss it ? Is it unsolved due to lack of credible evidence ? Or maybe unreliable statements and eye witness testimony ? <br /><br />Police force number one had the above mentioned 'gut instinct'. But he knew he'd need to find something tangible to reinforce it.He found blood, and dogs that found the scent of death. He found pretty contrasting and diverse descriptions of suspected abductors - so diverse there would be no common denominator, therefore none could stand up in court. He wasn't told to dismiss the investigation, he was actually dismissed himself. He wasn't told to disregard the forensic evidence, it was disregarded by his replacements on the orders of people above the police force. It's simple really, more than a couple of 'suits' sat down and said '' OK..how do we make this unsolvable ?'' What we should be asking is why they did..ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-66373879323089794502017-01-06T10:03:26.924+00:002017-01-06T10:03:26.924+00:00Gut instinct can lead you in the wrong direction.....Gut instinct can lead you in the wrong direction.... [Birmingham Six, Guildford Four?]<br /><br />You said "it is incredulous that it remains unsolved". It isn't.<br /><br />...Chez<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-50637507436611241142017-01-06T09:53:13.181+00:002017-01-06T09:53:13.181+00:00Ziggy - "Politicians never fight like this ov...Ziggy - "Politicians never fight like this over a crime that doesn't involve politicians."<br /><br />Possibly true - but then politicians are all over this case. Right from the start. Some of the highest and most prominent in the land. No wonder May et al don't want those files made public. TM have made them look like a bunch of suckers who were hoodwinked into supporting a lost child campaign and who now are acutely embarrassed at <br />jumped to the TM bidding. TM have done an amazing job - they even managed to get the Sun onside (imagine what the Fake Sheik could have unearthed on this case !?). What about Leveson - how did Gerry get away with that ? He PAID£500K to be kept on the front pages of newspapers and gets to make a sworn testimony about how his family has suffered from press intrusion? And no one said a word.<br /><br />For me govts have covered up their own involvement only to hid their embarrassment at supporting a scam that wasn't identified until SY told them otherwise. The day TM fled Portugal must have been a sobering moment for all involved. Who knows what the Sun/RB knows about this -what with all their criminal activities and bought contacts in the Met etc. <br /><br />I don't see any conspiracy (on the part of government , at last). Politicians wedded themselves to TM for altruistic reasons and possibly personal gain and you know that saying - marry in haste , repent at leisure. anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14792739188905706299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-26484987632318332622017-01-06T09:31:59.899+00:002017-01-06T09:31:59.899+00:00The key words in the above post were 'good ind...The key words in the above post were 'good indication' Chez. No-one is prosecuted on 'gut instinct' alone. <br /><br />Agree many serious crimes remain unsolved. Probably a lot more than we know. However, with advances in technology, even cases that are decades old are now being solved.Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-69863334798900660462017-01-05T23:12:53.579+00:002017-01-05T23:12:53.579+00:00" I have worked with senior police officers a..." I have worked with senior police officers and nearly all would say, yes it pays to have an open mind, yes sometimes crime scenes are not always what they appear to be, but all will say gut instinct is a good indication."<br /><br />Which is why we get miscarriages of justice!<br /><br />"Maybe that is why 10 years later it is incredulous that it remains unsolved"<br /><br />Why? Many serious crimes remain unsolved.<br /><br />..Chez Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-78769923866662805522017-01-05T18:12:56.103+00:002017-01-05T18:12:56.103+00:00And witch hunt it was. Tom Watson out-eviled Vinc...And witch hunt it was. Tom Watson out-eviled Vincent Price! <br /><br />So what have those who outed Saville, Harris, Hall et all achieved? How many children have they protected?<br /><br />I have sympathy for survivors. I am one! But I have nothing but scorn for those who claim their lives were fucked up because some rich old git once pinched their arse. <br /><br />At the age of 16, my mates and I went on a caravan holiday to the heart of darkness that was Great Yarmouth. Over the course of the week, at least 3 of us slept with the star turn of the resort night club. Were we traumatised? Not at all, we were laughing our heads off at Mr. X's OCD nightly routines and pretensions at being 10/15 years younger than he was. <br /><br />I think the majority of coppers would have had that gut instinct John. Maybe that is why 10 years later it is incredulous that it remains unsolved. It would be easy to blame the police, but I suspect their hands are tied more firmly on this case than any other. That is, it is not only Gerry McCann who is saying 'prove it'. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-31993196733507426602017-01-05T17:47:21.377+00:002017-01-05T17:47:21.377+00:00No problems Ziggy. The written word is my greatest...No problems Ziggy. The written word is my greatest pleasure, and it is always a joy to see it used so eloquently. <br /><br />I am very fortunate to have so many enlightened, thinking, contributors to my blog. It was always my dream to belong to some sort of 'Bloomsbury Club'. I'm not entirely sure if I was drawn to the drink, drugs and promiscuity, or the exciting new ideas. I'll stay 50/50 on that one, lol. <br /><br />I jest, I flirt with everyone, tis my nature, ha ha. My sons rarely let me out unaccompanied, they are still looking for that 3rd signature on the committal form since the Judge dismissed the pawprint of an unwilling mutt, (also co-author of my early works) and held hostage to a packet of sausages. It was a traverse! <br /><br />But I digress. I do hope Ziggy, that in some way, shape and form, you are preserving your life for your forbears (is that the right word?). As I said, somewhere today, the pen is so much mightier than the sword. And if you have got the gift of the gab (and you have) you are blessed. <br /><br />I have a pet hate for writers who are pretentious, so fecking cryptic that you haven't got a clue what they are talking about. First rule of writing NO EXPOSITION, Show, don't Tell. Unfortunately, the pompous take this to extremes, they write only for those, who, like themselves are impressed with big obscure words. Whilst the rest of us are referring to the dictionary for some sort of translation, the plot is lost! <br /><br />Unashamedly, and over and over again, my dear old Dad was the greatest teacher I ever met. If he didn't know the answer, we would look it up and find out together. And he explained everything to me as if I was 4 years old, even when I was 40. <br /><br />He wasn't treating me as if I was dumb, he was just finding a way of explaining things to me so I could understand. I used the same methods myself as a lecturer, I brought the shortcuts to my 'state' students.<br /><br />You have much to say Ziggy and you say it with talent. It is worth preserving for children, your grandchildren, and the Star Trek generation. They say it is politicians and statesmen who change the world, but it isn't. It is the writers, those who challenge the status quo with their words. <br /><br />This is an exciting new era, a challenge for those of us still up for a gladiatorial head to head in any arena. The MSM may turn us away but we can create our own media. Let the audience decide. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-42644504101003758282017-01-05T17:14:25.162+00:002017-01-05T17:14:25.162+00:00Yes, Ziggy You have scored a few points here, but ...Yes, Ziggy You have scored a few points here, but as I have said before; I’m not really much of an investigative detective, though I try to read the p j files when I get inspiration. I’m more emotional so to speak. As Rosalinda is now discussing another subject, I’ll just comment on one little thing.<br /><br />As for the McCanns’ staging of the crime scene, I don’t think they could have done it much better. If they had, for example, tried to scratch the untouched window opening with some kind of object to make it look more as if someone had entered or left through it, they would then have needed to get rid of that object and they certainly hadn’t too much time to do so. Not as easy as it may seem. <br /><br />Nor could they at any time have slid out through the opening, just to damage it a little bit as an intruder would have done, without the risk of being seen, and there would have been paint residues on their clothes. They could absolutely not have smashed any window, as they would have been seen entering and leaving the apartment, but still not any abductor near the apartment. They could of course have pushed the twins cots more apart, as well as they could have thrown Madeleine’s little pink blanket on the floor, making it look more like a crime scene. Yes, I really wonder why they didn’t.<br /><br />If I’m not mistaken, didn’t Gerry first say that the whole apartment was locked, but changed his statement the following day, saying the patio door was always unlocked. If I’m right on this point, then Gerry and Kate must have needed the open window, but a thief or an abductor would never have needed the open window as a red herring, unless that person had, or had had, some relation to the Ocean Club and access to the front door key, and therefore opened the window to make it look like a break-in, by a stranger, and then left by the front door.<br />Possible, but very farfetched really.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Björnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-25716826353747054762017-01-05T15:43:20.977+00:002017-01-05T15:43:20.977+00:00Hi Ziggy, Why do seemingly very intelligent people...Hi Ziggy, Why do seemingly very intelligent people make the strangest choices in life? The history books are full of it. Quick point on your last comment regarding during a global fear and suspicion, remember this all happened well before Saville, Harris, Hall and the witch hunt that took place afterwards. I'm guessing by that time it was too late to back track on turning against the McCann, with particular reference on the witch hunt that followed in innocent people being accused of sexual crimes. As with other views perhaps the McCanns didn't flee, but they didn't stay either to assist the PJ in helping to find their daughter. Would innocent parents do that? I have worked with senior police officers and nearly all would say, yes it pays to have an open mind, yes sometimes crime scenes are not always what they appear to be, but all will say gut instinct is a good indication.John100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-4300738114313596352017-01-05T05:51:54.116+00:002017-01-05T05:51:54.116+00:00part 2
'' This was actually a rather easy ...part 2<br />'' This was actually a rather easy case from the beginning, but the McCanns themselves made it so complicated, ''<br /><br /> If a case is easy from the beginning, charges are made fast. The McCann's didn't take the police off the case.They didn't bring in the Prime Minister of Britain or Portugal or military intelligence or the Home Office.They didn't take charge of the forensic investigation or lose and dismiss evidence already filed. They didn't call in a former intelligence officer / politician to represent them and co-ordinate any long term( there's your big big clue to what's happened) media campaigns- they were given them, in the same way they were given so much funding.<br /> <br />''I haven’t read Pat Brown’s book, though I believe she is a gifted criminal profiler''<br /><br />( She is. But she acknowledges the bizarre and unprecedented over- involvement of a lot of politicians and says no more except, no conspiracy.Why no conspiracy ? Politicians talk behind closed doors before deciding on action. Her pre-scripted performance on Montel Williams' show -youtube- was down the same grid as Oprah's pantomimes)<br /><br />''since they “fled” from PDL in the autumn of 2007''<br /><br />They didn't flee. They went home. From there, ever since , they've said and done nothing publicly spontaneously.The hijackers of the case( mainly our politicians but in concert with others abroad) have scripted and coordinated all of it. They have been made untouchable.That's a shame. If they're innocent, they'll still have the stigma of being suspected killers of their daughter when all they were doing was keeping quiet and defending yet another vile ring of psychopaths unknowingly. If they're guilty, it would have been quicker, far cheaper and easier to arrest, charge and imprison them,especially during a climate of global fear and suspicion surrounding so many people in high places and their covering up of crimes against children. But they chose the risky, expensive, career-threatening choice .Why would they do that. Seriously-why ?<br /><br /><br />ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-73542889525999713792017-01-05T05:50:45.960+00:002017-01-05T05:50:45.960+00:00Part 1 - Hi Ros, thank you for your words. High pr... Part 1 - Hi Ros, thank you for your words. High praise indeed coming from yourself. I appreciate it. I'm trying to breathe some life into things. There has to be something, somewhere, people have looked past in favour of the many red herrings.<br /><br />Ho Bjorn ( happy new year to you too )<br /><br />A conspiracy :a secret plan or agreement to carry out an illegal or harmful act, esp with political motivation; plot. <br /><br />I mention that so you know why I'm about to clarify a couple of your points.<br /><br /> ''We should never forget, that the first police officer, who arrived at the scene of the crime almost immediately concluded, that there had not been a break-in. Nor did he find any trace of an intruder.''<br /><br />( there was no need for a break in, the door was unlocked so could be opened quietly , but whoever entered the apartment would have to have known that no forced entry would be needed ; that frames the McCanns, Tapas 9, or watching predator. Wouldn't the McCanns, had they killed their child deliberately or by accident, at least have tried to stage a broken door or shutters scenario so they wouldn't be suspected ? )<br /><br />'' they made the whole Portuguese P J their archenemy, for questioning, not them, but their abduction hypothesis. There could only have been one reason, as to why they did so.''<br /><br />( In challenging their abduction hypothesis they were accusing them of lying. it follows that such an accusation, even implied, is still an accusation. They were basically calling the parents suspects, and implying the abduction hypothesis was their denial of involvement> That's why they called them the enemy).<br /><br /><br />''Had the abduction hypothesis been completely ruled out at that moment, an intensive search for, not just Madeleine alive, but also for her dead body, not too far away from McCann’s apartment would have come about, and the case would have been solved by now. ''<br /><br />( Nothing can be ruled out that fast. A child goes missing in the dark in a foreign country and there's no visible signs of struggles or violence and there's two distraught( genuine or not, the police wouldn't and can't make that guess so early) parents. The McCann's hypothesis, at that point, is supported because the child isn't there. Murder isn't supported as there's no body or nothing to suggest violence or struggle)<br /><br />ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-42054212577481211212017-01-04T19:31:49.882+00:002017-01-04T19:31:49.882+00:00Hi John and Hi Ziggy and a Happy New Year to you, ...Hi John and Hi Ziggy and a Happy New Year to you, if I’ve forgotten you<br /><br />I’m with you John, in that I’ve never ever believed in any conspiracy at all, just that there are a lot of stupid politicians and police detectives here and there, and that the McCanns are rather intelligent people, who have managed to dupe many of them by their faked commitment to finding their daughter. Many of them are quite aware of being fooled, and wish they had never sided with the McCanns, and they are just keeping quiet and waiting for the case to be closed, and avoid talking about it with anybody, let alone with one another. Not really conspiracy Ziggy. Cowardice, I would call it.<br /><br />We should never forget, that the first police officer, who arrived at the scene of the crime almost immediately concluded, that there had not been a break-in. Nor did he find any trace of an intruder. Consequently, he told the McCanns, what he believed, and that was, that there had not been an abduction. <br /><br />Being worried and innocent, and then hearing an experienced Police officer saying such a thing, a natural reaction would of course have been to feel comforted, at least for a while, and then to ask the Ocean Club staff and others to look for a little girl named Madeleine, who might have walked out from their apartment on her own. Instead they made the whole Portuguese P J their archenemy, for questioning, not them, but their abduction hypothesis. There could only have been one reason, as to why they did so.<br /><br />Had the abduction hypothesis been completely ruled out at that moment, an intensive search for, not just Madeleine alive, but also for her dead body, not too far away from McCann’s apartment would have come about, and the case would have been solved by now. <br /><br />This was actually a rather easy case from the beginning, but the McCanns themselves made it so complicated, in order to distract attention away from their own involvement. I really don’t feel like speculating, when talking about the McCanns’ guilt, as there is so much in the P J files supporting the hypothesis about Madeleine dying in the apartment and that Gerry and Kate may then have disposed of her body.<br /><br />I haven’t read Pat Brown’s book, though I believe she is a gifted criminal profiler, and I’ve just read a few selected chapters in Gonzalo Amaral’s book on the internet, instead I have focused a lot on the P J files, and I have also tried to watch and listen to what the McCanns have said publicly all these years. <br /><br />I really doubt that the McCanns have ever been investigated by the P J or by the S Y, since they “fled” from PDL in the autumn of 2007, so it’s about time now.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Björnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-75510543426364114612017-01-04T13:21:01.302+00:002017-01-04T13:21:01.302+00:00Hi NL, interesting. Although I am not sure I enti...Hi NL, interesting. Although I am not sure I entirely agree with you on the McCanns being directed by others from the start. <br /><br />I think Gerry found his niche. He loved being followed around by the paparazzi, and he loved scolding them on his blog. He became quite the PR man, probably throwing in as many ideas as Clarence. If a picture paints a 1000 words, take a look at Gerry giving a presentation on the Wider Agenda. <br /><br />And to be fair, the campaign was phenomenal, within days the Madeleine donation chart went off the scale, and also the Madeleine website, when it passed it's first million. They were, quite literally, raking it in. <br /><br />For a while there Gerry and Kate had the Midas Touch, which is why they were courted by media moguls, prime ministers and faux compassionate celebrities. Unfortunately for them, most of it ended abruptly when they were made Arguidoes. <br /><br />Since then, those who most enjoyed the golden era have done their utmost to revive it. If it were a goose of the golden variety, it would be like trying to bring it back to life after it had been stuffed. <br /><br />Were I to write the movie, the integral scene would be that flight back to PDL starring Clarence and Gerry. It would capture that moment when you bond instantly with a stranger, when you realise one other thinks like you do. It was a bromance, but not of the sexual variety, more a meeting of minds. Now, I am trying to think who should play them, doh! Any suggestions would be much appreciated :)<br /><br />Totally agree on the makeup photo. Their friend Jon was a photographer, deh! If I had a friend who was a photographer I would probably be in full costume and make up every time he/she dropped by. <br /><br />I actually find it creepy that there are people out there who see sexual connotations in those photos. Who thinks like that? The muck comes from their own minds, nowhere else. <br /><br />I have many happy memories, and photographs, of myself as a child with my hair backcombed 'like The Supremes' by my mother. And the photographs were taken by a man, not a relative, a family friend. If any pretendy 'analyst','expert' or 'researcher' online claimed they were evidence of abuse, I would projectile vomit over them. <br /><br />I imagine Kate and Madeleine had great fun playing dressing up, that's what mums and daughters do ffs. I think those trying to attach sinister overtones to one of Kate's precious memories of her daughter, are simply being cruel for cruelties sake. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-4977511500033545122017-01-04T12:31:44.876+00:002017-01-04T12:31:44.876+00:00Wow Ziggy I am blown away by the eloquence of your...Wow Ziggy I am blown away by the eloquence of your prose, it is a joy to read. I consider myself very fortunate to have such intelligent and thoughtful contributors.<br /><br />Ahh, the 7 stages of grief. A subject that intrigues me also, many thanks for listing them. It seemed to me on the night Madeleine disappeared, the parents, Kate especially, went straight to stage 3 and skipped stage 2 entirely!<br /><br />But I suppose we ought to factor in that they were in full survival mode, pumped with adrenalin with their brains completely focussed. They are both athletes, they get their 'highs' by pushing their bodies to the limit, and the buzz of the competition. Unlike drunks and junkies, they can keep their emotions and their behaviour in check, in public at least. <br /><br />But returning to the stages. From their interviews it appears stage 5 kicked in after 48 hours - before then they were 'non functioning'. But at this stage, they should have placed all their faith in the police - the most likely hope of their daughter's return.<br /><br />With the police however, they were still at stage 2, anger. Their anger should have been towards themselves, but it was aimed at the police. At this stage, mere mortals would be totally dependent on 'Maddie's rescuers', they wouldn't be hostile towards them, they would be assisting them in every way they could. <br /><br />So much food for thought in your post Ziggy, many thanks. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-34684923173894435932017-01-04T12:06:18.480+00:002017-01-04T12:06:18.480+00:00I don't believe that the awful make-up was don...I don't believe that the awful make-up was done by Madeleine herself but it can't be stated as 100% fact that she didn't.Marynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-73138965821698448542017-01-04T12:01:10.251+00:002017-01-04T12:01:10.251+00:00It's almost 9 years since the Shannon Matthews...It's almost 9 years since the Shannon Matthews scam.<br /><br />Poor Karen, thinking that she would be able to get away with it!Marynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-53936111916503584752017-01-04T11:57:37.072+00:002017-01-04T11:57:37.072+00:00Hi 19:33 and Happy New Year to you (I'm half S...Hi 19:33 and Happy New Year to you (I'm half Scots and Hogmanay last a week, lol).<br /><br />Did Bennett really say that? I actually hope the McCanns have reached the stage of ignoring him. They have spent hundreds of thousands on his attention seeking libel and given him the publicity he ached for. All to no avail, the man craves his day in Court, it's the only place ugly wannabe showmen can get the attention of a captive audience. Not only do they have to listen to him drone on, they have to write it down, gawd 'elp 'em. <br /><br />I must take a look at why the loon can categorically state Maddie playing with mummy's dressing up box is false? Htf would he know? Proves what a phoney he is, experts would never make a statement like that. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-23612754280367025842017-01-04T11:40:17.989+00:002017-01-04T11:40:17.989+00:00Is there a nice way of putting that Chez?
A nice ...Is there a nice way of putting that Chez?<br /><br />A nice way of saying the British establishment assisted the McCanns in deceiving the public? How many contributed to the McCann Fund for example when head of CEOP Jim Gamble, appeared with the parents on breakfast TV promoting the abduction? Even though the Portuguese Judiciary had named them arguidos. <br /><br />What of the men in PDL rounded up by DCI Redwood and accused of stealing Madeleine? I doubt they found the experience very nice.<br /><br />The first two Portuguese policemen on the scene, referred to as Tweedledum and Tweedledee by Kate in her book, knew immediately that the abduction was staged. Yet 10 years on and millions of pounds spent, the 'British' still look like bumbling fools as they bend over backwards, sidewards and upside down to promote the abduction story.<br /><br />Rather than admit that the UK authorities were wrong to interfere in the Portuguese investigation in 2007, subsequent governments have continued the farce. No other victims, or suspects, in history have had so much MSM support, public money and resources as the parents of Madeleine McCann.<br /><br />Say for example Karen Matthews' scam had continued, six years on, would Scotland Yard have produced an age progressed picture of Shannen? <br />Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-39724377071312040802017-01-04T10:48:37.905+00:002017-01-04T10:48:37.905+00:00@john 02:46
''I don't think there is ...@john 02:46<br /><br />''I don't think there is a big conspiracy, my personal opinion is that high ranking people got involved and now have to run with it to save face ''<br /><br />That's actually a conspiracyZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-44818847202457761422017-01-04T09:51:47.374+00:002017-01-04T09:51:47.374+00:00ZiggySawdust 3.1 @23:14
Interesting post.
“It...ZiggySawdust 3.1 @23:14<br /><br />Interesting post.<br /><br />“It's true that the McCanns turn up in all the right places ( ie Whitehouse , Downing Street etc). Does anyone really think they thought of this plan themselves ?”<br /><br />No, I don’t think they thought of this plan themselves. In fact, I have never believed that. I believe the McCanns were directed in what they should do and what they should say from day one.<br /><br />As for ‘the mystery of the make-up photo’, for me there’s no mystery at all. Creativity by Jon Corner and part of strategic planning. “Parents Kate and Gerry hope the [make-up] photo and a new video will trigger fresh leads.”, according to newspapers reports on 3 May 2010.<br /><br />“Her heartbroken parents have made the striking image available to mark today’s third anniversary of her tragic disappearance.”<br /><br />A present for Madeleine.<br /><br />And, as it happens:<br /><br />“The couple, from Rothley, Leics, visited Portugal last week to try to persuade police to re-open the investigation.<br /><br />They claim their team of three private investigators had discovered leads in police case files which had been dismissed.”<br /><br />As you say, acceptance and hope.<br /><br />NL<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-77786045698295374622017-01-04T02:46:39.337+00:002017-01-04T02:46:39.337+00:00I don't think there is a big conspiracy, my pe...I don't think there is a big conspiracy, my personal opinion is that high ranking people got involved and now have to run with it to save face. As there is so many organisations involved PJ, SY Labour & Tory Governments and Media someone somewhere would have blown the whistle by now. There is in my opinion no conspiracy. Someone had in all intents and purposes committed the perfect crime. Ive studied Jack The Ripper murders and read dozens of books, went through all theories from the outrageous to plausible and to be honest I believe the murderer is someone who the police probably overlooked. ( My theory is it was a police officer, he would know the area, can be trusted, knows the patrols and in those days attended autopsies hence some medical knowledge) I don't believe for one second the police then covered this up as I believe they just didn't know. Also don't forget The Yorkshire Ripper was caught by chance. In the end with the McCann case unless a body turns up or more evidence is forthcoming, we can only speculate as to the how, why, where & who.John100noreply@blogger.com