tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post3496604115170563304..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: MCCANNS HOUSE OF CARDSRosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-48287398050981710562015-09-17T00:58:59.214+01:002015-09-17T00:58:59.214+01:00Behavioural patterns - cool - but just indications...Behavioural patterns - cool - but just indications<br />Dog alerts without corrobarative scientific finds - cool - but just indications <br /><br />I don't like what I've seen of K&G either - they seem to be in a constant loop of 'Abigail's party'.<br /><br />But unless/until we have evidence of their wrong doing (beyond the proven child neglect) - and not just indications/hunches/glory hunting South African weirdos' findings<br /><br />We are stymied<br /><br />The sooner the truth romantics on these boards wake up to this - the betterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-91410767251304631582015-09-16T17:21:09.404+01:002015-09-16T17:21:09.404+01:00Where did the awkward questions go, by the way?? T...Where did the awkward questions go, by the way?? They were rather frequent in 2007-2008. Totally unprepared at times, the answers they came up with were equally awkward or should I say shocking ("ask the dogs, Sandra")<br />The best example ever of a Duper's delight is when Gerry and Kate get the question whether their emotions are going on a rollercoaster each time there's a reported sighting of Madeleine...and Gerry's face. THAT SMIRK.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-37613986974844226592015-09-16T11:28:35.839+01:002015-09-16T11:28:35.839+01:00Jerry McCann certainly wasn't ''feelin...Jerry McCann certainly wasn't ''feeling a tad chilly'' when being interviewed in one of the video's, they'd obviously put him on the spot by asking an awkward question that he wasn't prepared to answer. Off came the microphone, and off he scarped to get some fresh air leaving Kate fanning her face and at the mercy of the interviewer. <br /><br />Every picture does tell a story 00:24 and I believe it told a true story and a lot more besides. ''Eyes/ facial expressions are indeed part of body language - but boy can one get that one wrong''. What next, you'll be saying the dogs got it wrong too!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-50073258014528434442015-09-16T10:37:38.700+01:002015-09-16T10:37:38.700+01:00No, it's not a whole different kettle of fish....No, it's not a whole different kettle of fish. When the body language goes hand in hand with linguistics, over and over repeatedly for years, a behavioural pattern is there for all to see. Not just one picture up for interpretation by one or two...No, we're taking about lots and lots of videos captured due to constant media exposure. The masks hiding the truth couldn't be more visibleAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-15332971666325226682015-09-16T00:24:23.219+01:002015-09-16T00:24:23.219+01:00@ 19.55
'Eyes, facial expressions, speech, ch...@ 19.55<br /><br />'Eyes, facial expressions, speech, choice of words etc.'<br /><br />Speech/choice of words - are not body language - they fall into linguistics - whole different kettle of fish<br /><br />Eyes/facial expression are indeed part of body language - but boy can one get that one wrong. I direct you to an article in the MSM today about an MP - who the BBC 'caught' in the House of Commons - Alec Shelbrooke (Con), allegedly napping.<br /><br />In fact the gentleman in question is partially deaf and tried to listen to the loudspeaker embedded in his seat - the Beeb had to apologise for their very flawed observation of his 'body language'.<br /><br />Every picture tells a story - but not every picture tells the true story.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-51193189932289653522015-09-15T19:55:48.296+01:002015-09-15T19:55:48.296+01:00@Anon 01.22
But the 'feeling a tad chilly'...@Anon 01.22<br />But the 'feeling a tad chilly' person would show more than just crossing arms, just as the 'defensive' one would show more indications than crossed arms. Eyes, facial expressions, speech, choice of words etc. Now there's the big difference between feeling a tad chilly and having a defensive stance/attitude. The whole picture makes the red herring, not just one detail.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-43558635271505305992015-09-15T01:22:07.123+01:002015-09-15T01:22:07.123+01:00Whilst agreeing with most of the above post, this ...Whilst agreeing with most of the above post, this line should not go unchallenged:<br /><br />'Body language, forensic linguistics and spotting lies, is not a new science.'<br /><br />The study of body language is not a science in the Newtonian sense - it is<br />merely an indicator - bit like the wonder dogs - only indicate - not prove anything.<br /><br />To put it simply - someone entering a room, standing in the corner with his/her arms crossed - might INDICATE a defensive stance/attitude - it could also mean <br />the person is feeling a tad chilly.<br /><br />Big difference. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-39732519386461950822015-09-14T23:31:51.858+01:002015-09-14T23:31:51.858+01:00I know more than you, lol. Most people do, includ...I know more than you, lol. Most people do, including the Portuguese police, who spotted the weird behaviour immediately - for future reference, all the codswollop about parents grieving in different ways, was just that codswollop. Too many of us have suffered real grief, we know what it looks like and we know what it feels like. The idea of setting up an online shop and turning a missing child into a global marketing product within days of that child's loss is abhorrent to most of us, it was unbelievable then, and the passage of time hasn't it any favours, its even more unbelievable now. The Portuguese police are, it appears, way ahead of their British counterparts, they understand the basic scientific principle 'if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it is probably a duck'. An essential, one would have thought, for Chapter One of 'How to become an Ace Detective'. <br /><br />Not only did it appear that the British police were bereft of this vital piece of sound advice, they were also totally oblivious to the fact that the main suspects were telling them whopping great big porkies. Body language, forensic linguistics and spotting lies, is not a new science. Arguably some of the old thief takers were naturals, but if these sciences are not applied in the detection of crime, then why aren't they? And if they have been applied in this case, then everyone from the experts at the top to the enforcers at the bottom, should be urgently re-assessed, because they clearly don't their arses from their elbows. <br /><br />The indecent haste to make money out of their missing daughter, their need to control the investigation, and the dire acting skills of Gerry and Kate was as plain as the elongated nose on Pinocchio's face. Whilst the rest of the world was admiring Kate and Gerry's finery, an online community sprung up of outcasts, people like the little boy, bold enough to point out the Emperor wasn't wearing any clothes. People who could see the lies and people who questioned the McCanns' demands for punitive changes to our libel, criminal and news reporting laws. A backdoor way in which to persuade the public to welcome policing of the internet. Since McCann, journalists have been imprisoned, yes, here in the UK! Journalists have never been latter day saints, and if they were, they wouldn't be any bleddy good. We don't want our newspapers, de-loused, boil washed and starched before it reaches us, we want it raw, live and real. And it takes the bad guys to get us the good stories! If the trend to imprison journalists continues, then the public will get what the public asked for, sanitised news. <br /><br />But I digress, as long the inner core of this particular circle of hell, continues to lie, the ripples will keep spreading outwards. More people become involved, kids grow up, relationships change, the risks become greater and the truth closes in. It won't go away, it can't go away. How do you stand in a witness box, and repeat a story you didn't have faith in when you told it the first time around! And one that hasn't been improved on in 8 years? <br /> <br /><br /> Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-59681215618964663832015-09-14T19:35:40.211+01:002015-09-14T19:35:40.211+01:00"what do I know"
nothing"what do I know"<br /><br />nothingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-61289268676088904512015-09-14T17:15:00.594+01:002015-09-14T17:15:00.594+01:00Brilliant again cristobell. I seem to say after ev...Brilliant again cristobell. I seem to say after everyone one of your posts... The best yet ....I do believe your writings are getting better and better each time. I fully agree that in Gordon Browns case it was an attempt to replicate the PR success that Tony Blair had when he first became PM following the tragic death of Princess Di. If you recall he used the mass hysteria created by the media to set himself up as the hero and eventually force the queen against her better judgements to return 2 little boys who had just lost their mum to London to face an hysterical crowd instead of protecting them in the haven she had created for them in Scotland. If you believe the Helen Mirren version of events the queen was well aware of what he was at when she said to him Diana's death greatly helped your image didn't it Mr Blair .....or words to that effect. <br />I have said time and again it wasn't that there were dark hands within the government ready to jump to the aid of a couple of very unlikeable nobodies. It had worked for Tony Blair in 1997 when it was against the queen so why not work again in 2007 when the opposition in the form of the portuguese wasn't quite as powerful or well liked. <br />As for the USA once it was seen that the PM had jumped on board the next step for Gerry was to try and get the yanks on board I think it took them a bit less time to figure out what was going on and they were long sending him packing <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-9834592367556763132015-09-14T09:06:40.652+01:002015-09-14T09:06:40.652+01:00Good perception Ros, and probably a lot nearer the...Good perception Ros, and probably a lot nearer the reality than two chav medics from the boonies who just happen to have Brown's phone number on speed dial.Himselfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666097098083216833noreply@blogger.com