tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post4600834866770391369..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: THE DAMAGING IMPACT OF MCCANN TROLLSRosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger83125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-63688946000477108512017-03-09T04:44:09.922+00:002017-03-09T04:44:09.922+00:00According to all the eye witness testimony, the su...According to all the eye witness testimony, the suspects are : casually dressed; tall;short;stocky;skinny; of scruffy appearance;smart but casual; 'not a tourist'(?) ;collar length greasy hair;clean cut;having a 'bad skin problem' ;'like Gerry McCann. And that's probably about half of them only...<br /><br />If people can't describe someone they've seen recently, i don't think that mistaking Murat for someone else( or vice versa) is so nonsensical.It was late(no daylight), and he is the only player in the tragedy who could actually claim a lookalike that borders on a doppleganger.One that's also English and has a place nearby. It's ok to quote and cite e-fits that look like they've been put together by a drunken monkey with felt tips, but to cite a 'double' that actually exists is nonsense ? I'm not suggesting skullduggery by the two men, i'm suggesting that the eye witness testimony is already a joke for the most part .A lot of what remains is fiction or 'mistakes'. Witnesses talked to him;witnesses didn't. It's a mess.<br /><br />If somebody holds a different view to your own, that doesn't make there view 'bullshit' or any other trolling adjective .Even if you suffer from a superiority complex, theories and opinions are of equal merit if none have proof of credibility.It can be hard to face for certain types of personality.<br /><br />I can't recall his name other than Angus.It doesn't matter, anyway, it just seemed relevant to where the discussion was heading.He's just Joe Public.Murat's Joe Public too-albeit a bit of an enigmatic one. Neither look like the abductor.Nor do the McCanns. The abductor's a 'secret'.He's a riddle wrapped up in a MI 6 file :)ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-75033587530567357252017-03-08T19:42:16.085+00:002017-03-08T19:42:16.085+00:00Apologies Ziggy, I have started a new blog and dis...Apologies Ziggy, I have started a new blog and discussion on Robert Murat! Don't get carried away!Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-65416599574492290982017-03-08T19:32:48.799+00:002017-03-08T19:32:48.799+00:00I have just rushed out a blog on Robert Murat, wou...I have just rushed out a blog on Robert Murat, would value your opinions there. :) Imo, it really is time to 'blow up' the nonsense of Bennett and Hall. They are both seedy opportunists who will invent anything to sex the case up!Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-81249670563777101272017-03-08T18:43:06.789+00:002017-03-08T18:43:06.789+00:00Could people stop this nonsense, that Murat could ...Could people stop this nonsense, that Murat could have been mistaken for somebody else.<br /><br />It might be an opinion but it is totally worthless, as both Fiona Payne and Rachel Oldfield have signed police statements stating, he was outside 5a that night, he came up to me, shook me by the hand and said, I am Robert Murat, I noticed he had a squint.<br /><br />If you are stitching somebody up, could you be any clearer in your identification?<br /><br />As for repeating Bennett's bullshit what does it achieve?<br /><br />It isn`t helpful reallyJJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-47156097835503884662017-03-08T18:00:51.589+00:002017-03-08T18:00:51.589+00:00@ Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton8 March 2017 at 17:2...@ Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton8 March 2017 at 17:22<br /><br />I think that's more or less what i was saying when suggesting the detectives had 'created' another suspect( red herring). I take your point Re the cliches that abound based on iconic cases as seen on TV ( Dahmer, Brady etc).Ridiculous.As for 'tabloid journalists', don't go there.I have that phrase in my Unofficial Book Of Oxymorons. I'm surprised nobody has offered up any comparisons to Norman Bates ( ''m-m-my..m-m-mother wouldn't like that'').<br /><br />Murat does come across as-different.Maybe unconventional.That doesn't make him a 'weirdo' as many suggest.He might be, he might not be, but people who don't know him personally don't qualify to have an opinion and expect it to be taken seriously. We're told of his closeness to his mother, his distance from his ex wife( and daughter) and difficulty holding on to a woman.Then there's his friendship with a Russian who was designing a web site for him.He's Russian- so must be evil or 'up to something' right ?<br /><br />I can't remember the name, but there's a man in PDL-also a brit- and you could take him as Murat's identical twin.It's eerie.I wonder if he gets any problems from other eagle-eyed brits by mistake.I wonder if he's been in places far from Murat and been mistaken for him.It might explain some 'sightings' of Murat or explain why he was in two places at once.It isn't helpful really.<br /><br />Jane Tanner. That name is annoying in all things McCann.Somebody should have abducted her tongue.<br /><br />Telling comment :''To me it looked as though Robert Murat was being set up to take the heat off the parents.''<br /><br />Now Ms Unbound.Explain to me...<br /><br />Who would set Murat up and why ? Who would want to take the heat off the McCanns-and why.Early in a case like this, detectives don't-and shouldn't anyway- care who they put the heat on.It's either an abduction of a toddler or worse.Everyone there , nearby, or involved with the complex and/or McCanns should have the 'heat on' until a good reason to remove it is arrived at.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-10463389157239517502017-03-08T17:22:15.708+00:002017-03-08T17:22:15.708+00:00I think Robert Murat was selected by British force...I think Robert Murat was selected by British forces based on a profile they created. Ie. single man, living with his mother, knows the area etc. This was conveniently supported by an anonymous phone call to the PJ that claimed RM was a weirdo with small animals as a child. In other words textbook stuff, straight from every US crime program and the childhood of Jeffrey Dahmer. <br /><br />In addition, there was the helpful tip off from Lori Campbell, tabloid journalist, who saw similarities with Ian Huntley and the Soham child murders. <br /><br />To me it looked as though Robert Murat was being set up to take the heat off the parents. I believe him when he says he did not become involved until the following morning. So do the police.<br /><br />I curse myself that I am unable to c/p, but there is a good account of Jane Tanner's participation in an police uncover operation to identify Robert Murat in Goncalo Amaral's book 'The Truth of the Lie'. <br /><br />JT positively identifies Robert Murat as he walks across the top of the road. The following day RM was named Arguido, and 3 members of the Tapas group, recognising him on TV, then remember seeing him there on the night of the 3rd. <br /><br />The locals who were outside 5A on the night, and who know RM, did not see him. All the 'evidence' against RM came from the British. Four members of the tapas group, Lori Campbell and the police agency who drew up the 'profile', CEOP, I believe, who were trying to make it some sort of internet crime.<br /><br />Jane Tanner now vehemently denies that she identified RM during the police stake out and there was going to be a civil action, but there have been so many I can't remember offhand who was going to sue who!<br /> Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-30389168300974185752017-03-08T16:43:18.392+00:002017-03-08T16:43:18.392+00:00Thanks a lot JJ and Anon 14:38
You may well be bet...Thanks a lot JJ and Anon 14:38<br />You may well be better informed than me, I've always thought that Fiona and Jane T. changed their witness statements.<br /><br />As for Kate's reasoning in her book. Interesting, but it was years after her writing in her diary, so she really had plenty of time to think what would be the best for her to say. One thing, however, is quite clear, and that is that Kate at some point of time considered the possibility of Murat being involved, but that she now, at least publicly, don't think so anymoreBjörnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-9985805926223317892017-03-08T14:38:52.802+00:002017-03-08T14:38:52.802+00:00Björn @11:20
Perhaps the following might be of in...Björn @11:20<br /><br />Perhaps the following might be of interest? NL<br /><br />(After Kate’s description of her thoughts and feelings towards Murat, which filled her with anger and hatred (it is an ‘intensely personal account’ after all), there is a sort of change of direction in 'madeleine’.) <br /><br />“Nothing we were told by the police indicated that Murat took Madeleine or was in any way involved in her abduction. We had no context for the disconnected pieces of information Neves and Encarnação did pass on to us, which we assumed were all they were allowed to reveal. In isolation these suggested it was possible Murat was linked in some way to the events of 3 May, and for a long time we didn’t know what to think. Once we fell victim ourselves to the vagaries of the Portuguese police system, we soon discovered how easy it was for two and two to be put together to make five.<br /><br />When I read through the PJ files in microscopic detail after their release to the public in 2008, I found nothing to implicate Murat. It is clear that the police never had any credible case against him.”<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-46508181541163607382017-03-08T14:37:45.808+00:002017-03-08T14:37:45.808+00:00Bjorn 11:20
Opinion is fine but could we just for...Bjorn 11:20<br /><br />Opinion is fine but could we just for once stick to the facts given in police statements.<br /><br />If you or anybody else has evidence/proof, that the Tapas friends withdrew their ID of Murat outside 5a, can you produce it. <br />They did not and have not.<br />They repeated their allegations in a confrontation with Murat at the police station, the video is there for everyone to look at of the tapas 3 entering the station<br /><br />It is Bennett's/Hall bullshit repeated, ad nauseam, and it is not true.<br /><br />And all Kate has ever said regarding Murat is "I came across nothing that could be classified as evidence against Murat" (hardly a ringing endorsement). <br /><br />I know people like gossip but the truth is far more interesting.JJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-91576714084787171052017-03-08T13:15:45.450+00:002017-03-08T13:15:45.450+00:00Ziggy,
In my 8 March 2017 at 12:05 post “…you wo...Ziggy, <br /><br />In my 8 March 2017 at 12:05 post “…you would not be interested such an admission…”<br /><br />Should've been “…you would not be interested in such an admission…”<br /><br />Sorry.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-352665957151000712017-03-08T12:18:05.075+00:002017-03-08T12:18:05.075+00:00Anonymous 7 March 2017 at 21:31
“Anonymous @14:25...Anonymous 7 March 2017 at 21:31<br /><br />“Anonymous @14:25<br /><br />Now that Ziggy's answered your four questions, might I do likewise (in style currently adopted by Ronnie O'Sullivan):<br /><br />1. Is there such a thing (as an unbiased account/source)?<br />2. No<br />3. Yes<br />4. Yes<br /><br />Next.”<br /><br />How interesting… I again find myself in agreement with you.<br /><br />Next (my answers):<br /> <br />1. My pragmatic (as opposed to full-blown ‘ontological’) answer to your question is: No, there isn’t “such a thing” in a rational discussion of MM case – the case I’m most concerned with here. Ziggy appears to hold an unsound contrary view.<br /><br />Furthermore. While being quiet about his source/s, Ziggy has been telling us about how he deals with the information available to him. In the absence of Ziggy’s answer as to his source/s, we remain “unbound” (:D) to draw our own inference/s in that regard.<br /><br />2. No<br />3. Yes<br />4. Yes<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-65706629298094287222017-03-08T12:05:19.923+00:002017-03-08T12:05:19.923+00:00ZiggySawdust 7 March 2017 at 18:22
Many thanks. ...ZiggySawdust 7 March 2017 at 18:22<br /><br />Many thanks. I take note of everything you’ve said.<br /><br />“I think of 'unbiased' as refusing to be swayed by public opinion, newspapers opinions, and a lot of direct quotes from the McCanns, Amaral or politicians.I prefer to read about the step-by-step events of May 3.I compare direct quotes to former quotes.”<br /><br />“If i read sources online i tend to find an occasional needle in a haystack of well reasoned and impartial observations. They're rare, though.”<br /><br />Could you please post a link or two to what you’ve read?<br /><br />“The blood/DNA/Dog evidence was dismissed.”<br /><br />A link to “dismissed” if you could please.<br /><br />“Of all the main players, if it wasn't a stranger- abduction or procurement( which amounts to the same)I suspect Murat more than the McCanns or Tapas posse.”<br /><br />The way you’ve put it lets me infer that you accept that the non-abduction conjecture has merit, although you “suspect Murat more than the McCanns or Tapas posse”.<br /><br /><br />ZiggySawdust 7 March 2017 at 18:27<br /><br />“''Do you know of any indication/s that the McCanns have been aware that they are part of a conspiracy?''<br /><br />Any indication would purely be my own personal interpretation.”<br /><br />I would have quoted Kate’s admitting (in her account of the truth) to conspiring with her husband to deceive, but I realise you would not be interested such an admission on what appears to be the she-would-say-so-wouldn’t-she grounds.<br /><br />“They're between the proverbial rock and a hard place.”<br /><br />I believe they are indeed, for reasons different from those you cite, and they don’t find it funky.<br /><br />“There are a small number of Forensic Psychologists in the UK that are, arguably, the best in the business, and have solved many a riddle that was baffling Police Forces( David cantor is probably the best).But, if any where brought in, they would have nobody's agenda in mind,and they would investigate statements, crime scenes and the geography of PDL. They'd probably contribute more in the way of naming likely suspects or, at least, agree upon a good psychological profile of one.The investigation could only benefit from their addition to it.It could well lead to conviction(s). It makes you wonder why they've never been brought in really(not).”<br /><br />Once bitten, twice shy.<br /><br />Once upon a time Mark Harrison advised: http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARK_HARRISON.htm<br /><br />To seek David Canter’s opinion/advice would be somewhat masochistic, wouldn’t you think?<br /><br />Namaste.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-95051529413575372017-03-08T11:20:48.776+00:002017-03-08T11:20:48.776+00:00Hi NL
Yes you're right, some of their tapas fr...Hi NL<br />Yes you're right, some of their tapas friends said that they had seen Murat near the apartment, but none of them confirmed that, when they were later asked by the Portuguese police. Anyway, I've always thought that it's so strange that any of their tapas friends, possibly also Kate believed that Murat could be, or at least could have a connection to "Tannerman", and that they believed that Murat, in spite of this, decided to appear on the scene of the crime just one or two hours later too see and hear what the police were doing, and even (which is a fact) offer his assistance to translate the next morning.<br /><br />It would be interesting to hear Kate herself say exactly when she dismissed Murat and why. Is there something about that in her book? I've just read some parts of it.Björnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-25200916742602363182017-03-08T09:41:44.099+00:002017-03-08T09:41:44.099+00:00Björn 7.3 @20:02
I think Kate had to change her m...Björn 7.3 @20:02<br /><br />I think Kate had to change her mind (insinuation I’d say) about Murat when it was no longer credible/sustainable to suggest Murat was Tannerman. Notwithstanding the foregoing, I believe Jane Tanner saw a man (not Murat) carrying a child. I also believe Fiona Payne, Rachael Oldfield and Russell O’Brien saw Murat outside the McCanns' apartment on the night of Madeleine’s disappearance. <br /><br />NL<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-75776299863432987622017-03-07T22:45:00.355+00:002017-03-07T22:45:00.355+00:00Björn7 March 2017 at 20:02
'' I've ne...Björn7 March 2017 at 20:02<br /><br />'' I've never understood what it was that made Kate change her mind about Murat. Have I missed something?''<br /><br />Who knows Bjorn.In my reply to 'T' above ^^^ i suggested that the McCanns may have eventually began to smell something wasn't right.Her initial suspicion about Murat and her feelings about him, suggest she was angry at the thought of him being involved, and a rage was simmering in her. Again, it could have been down to the detectives creating another suspect to make them look thorough. Or, maybe they genuinely suspected him.It all came to nothing and he walked away a lot richer.It's either a case of KM being satisfied that he wasn't a suspect after all, or, more likely, that she knew that she, GM, and the rest of us, had been sold a dummy again.That might have been a pivotal moment for them.Maybe they realised that the red herrings and games were underway and maybe then they suspected that a conspiracy somewhere seedy and important was in motion.The change of heart is too extreme and too sudden to be just down to Murat being 'cleared'.Does 'cleared' mean innocent ? Who knows. Maybe the McCanns and Murat are being kept on a shelf next to the evidence.They may come in handy if the case needs finally closing one day.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-79494654330524771872017-03-07T21:31:06.859+00:002017-03-07T21:31:06.859+00:00Anonymous @14:25
Now that Ziggy's answered yo...Anonymous @14:25<br /><br />Now that Ziggy's answered your four questions, might I do likewise (in style currently adopted by Ronnie O'Sullivan):<br /><br />1. Is there such a thing (as an unbiased account/source)?<br />2. No<br />3. Yes<br />4. Yes<br /><br />Next.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-14534078571301143932017-03-07T20:02:03.738+00:002017-03-07T20:02:03.738+00:00Hi Ziggy and Rosalinda
As for Murat. Both Fiona Pa...Hi Ziggy and Rosalinda<br />As for Murat. Both Fiona Payne and Jane Tanner were suspicious about Robert Murat, and Kate herself, in her diary says something like "I know it's him.... I feel like wanting to kill him". However, at a certain point of time, for unknown reason, Kate does just not dismiss him as a potential perpetrator, but I've also the impression, that she begins to protect him. If she would still suspect him, which she apparently does not, she could have suggested a new dig in his garden, referring to Birch's claims about there being a void in the garden of Casa Liliana. I've never believed in Birch's hypothesis, but there is no need for me to discuss that, but what has made me so confused is, that I've never understood what it was that made Kate change her mind about Murat. Have I missed something?Björnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-23808646397009863732017-03-07T18:27:20.391+00:002017-03-07T18:27:20.391+00:00@ 'T' (2)
''Do you know of any in...@ 'T' (2)<br /><br />''Do you know of any indication/s that the McCanns have been<br />aware that they are part of a conspiracy?''<br /><br />Any indication would purely be my own personal interpretation. I think the McCanns believed an abduction had taken place.I believe any of us in those circumstances would fear the worst and suspect paedophile involvement because almost all-if not all- children who are abducted by a stranger end up dead after being 'used', shall we say.I think any parent would, deep down, have to entertain the reality of it.That either or both of the parents voiced this fear, in my opinion, was normal. That the vast majority of online haters( sorry, i mean detectives) read that as a 'slip' that indicates they 'know' what happened or that they 'know because they did it' is pretty disgusting.They're subjective conclusions heavily informed by an irrational bias that nobody can offer genuine official evidence for.<br /><br />I think Gerry displays a lot of suppressed anger and it increases with time.Some is over his daughter, obviously.But the parents aren't stupid people.The money spent, the time taken, the amount of PR 'given' to them by the government's man and the red herrings all over the globe to make it look like that money and time isn't being wasted, isn't sitting well with GM. He's asked for fresh 'independent' enquiries.That's telling in itself.He's complained on camera about 'media moguls' after losing his cool.I think he's been put in a position that would make it seem the height of ingratitude to complain about the help.The police and their 'sightings' is a double edger ;it makes them look busy, but when it inevitably comes up blank, it keeps the McCanns in the firing line.The police may be ostensibly serving the McCanns but they answer to their big chiefs.I can't, and won't, put words into Gm or Km's mouths, but my guess is that they can smell something.They're between the proverbial rock and a hard place.They're being protected from the hoards because those who protect them put them in the firing line of the hoards.<br /><br />NamsateZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-47503811454377375792017-03-07T18:22:38.481+00:002017-03-07T18:22:38.481+00:00@ 'T' (1)
''It is (topping a very...@ 'T' (1)<br /><br />''It is (topping a very important list) - the list marked ‘Never To Be Disclosed’.<br /><br />Agreed, T. By 'not important' i was implying that the most important list should be topped by a determination to investigate the case thoroughly, honestly, and as transparently as possible with a view to solving it then closing it.The Police are public servants and have a duty to us.<br /><br />''On what ‘unbiased’ (as opposed to Amaral’s and Kate’s books) source/s of information about the MM case have you been relying to say as you do?''<br /><br />I think of 'unbiased' as refusing to be swayed by public opinion, newspapers opinions, and a lot of direct quotes from the McCanns, Amaral or politicians.I prefer to read about the step-by-step events of May 3.I compare direct quotes to former quotes. I allow a margin for error from all parties as everyone is human.I don't 'add' anything to facial expressions or a blink or body language as so many are observed in 'unnatural'( TV, cameras, scripts) circumstances.I question the involvement of politicians because it's a departure from the norm and i doubt we'll see it again.If i read sources online i tend to find an occasional needle in a haystack of well reasoned and impartial observations. They're rare, though.<br /><br />''Is it your view that the McCanns’s having been walking free for ten years indicates their innocence?''<br /><br />Yes- until they're arrested, charged, and found guilty.<br /><br />''Do you know of any indication/s supportive of the view that there was no abduction?''<br /><br />The blood/DNA/Dog evidence was dismissed.Eye witness testimony was too wide ranging and unreliable.Too much of the potential evidence was contaminated.If , as many contend, bleaching had been undertaken, I'm sure damp would have been present and i think in an apartment so small, it wouldn't have taken a dogs nose to smell it.Of all the main players, if it wasn't a stranger- abduction or procurement( which amounts to the same)I suspect Murat more than the McCanns or Tapas posse.<br />ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-33110041409230157012017-03-07T15:45:55.353+00:002017-03-07T15:45:55.353+00:00JJ
Please ignore the above request for a link. I&...JJ<br /><br />Please ignore the above request for a link. I've found the page at last.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-54441029840728702632017-03-07T15:31:15.688+00:002017-03-07T15:31:15.688+00:00http://catalanmonitor.com/2017/01/12/two-ex-detect...http://catalanmonitor.com/2017/01/12/two-ex-detectives-of-metodo-3-private-detective-company-reported-to-have-worked-for-operation-catalonia/<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-75414117677045159722017-03-07T14:31:14.057+00:002017-03-07T14:31:14.057+00:00Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton7 March 2017 at 09:53
...Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton7 March 2017 at 09:53<br /><br />''I think most aggression stems from the frustration of not being able to communicate''<br /><br />Not being able to communicate can be down to a few things. Frustration is one. Lazy mindedness is one.Not being able to find the right word or phrase is one.Being drunk or stoned are another two.None of these reasons amount to even a half decent reason to subject anyone else to aggression.<br /><br />''George Bernard Shaw on this one 'why can't the English teach their children how to speak!'.''<br /><br />He'd be turning in his grave if he could hear most of them today. Especially if he could hear 'the chicken children' ( see Micky Flanagan').The slang is nowhere as imaginative as years ago and i have no idea whatsoever why the younger dickheads insist on trying to sound like they have roots in Jamaica.The white kids sound ridiculous.It's almost as though 'stupid' is a badge of honour.<br /><br />'' buzzing with drunken rabble of every nationality, ethnicity and socio economic group, on a Friday night''<br /><br />That describes every overstretched A and E in all major cities now, unfortunately.All those free spirits.I sound cynical.I am . I'm not wrong though.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-35829357667639851362017-03-07T14:25:45.607+00:002017-03-07T14:25:45.607+00:00ZiggySawdust
“Anonymous6 March 2017 at 23:30
&#...ZiggySawdust<br /><br />“Anonymous6 March 2017 at 23:30 <br /><br />''The truth in this case will not be found in academic studies''”<br /><br />The truth in this case will not be found.<br /><br />“So we know the truth, once again, isn't topping any important lists.”<br /><br />It is (topping a very important list) - the list marked ‘Never To Be Disclosed’.<br /><br /><br /><br />“…speak again.”<br />(King Lear act 1)<br /><br />On what ‘unbiased’ (as opposed to Amaral’s and Kate’s books) source/s of information about the MM case have you been relying to say as you do?<br /><br />Is it your view that the McCanns’s having been walking free for ten years indicates their innocence?<br /><br />Do you know of any indication/s supportive of the view that there was no abduction?<br /><br />Do you know of any indication/s that the McCanns have been<br />aware that they are part of a conspiracy?<br /><br />Namaste.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-46941221789067415842017-03-07T14:12:08.525+00:002017-03-07T14:12:08.525+00:00Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton7 March 2017 at 08:49
...Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton7 March 2017 at 08:49<br /><br />''Who are the 'idiots' you fear? The ones who should be refused admission? How do you quantify 'idiot'?''<br /><br />I don't fear idiots.I just have little or no time for them-why would i have any ? Quantifying an 'idiot' isn't rocket science. They do the work for you. If it's not their noises, it's their actions.It's rarely subjective. Most times it's just about recognising a spade as a spade.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-74487495090026025752017-03-07T09:53:49.734+00:002017-03-07T09:53:49.734+00:00Amen to that Bjorn. It's always been my experi...Amen to that Bjorn. It's always been my experience that if you listen to a person's grievance the matter can be peacefully resolved. Not always of course, but like yourself I behave as I would in the real world, and simply walk away. <br /><br />I think most aggression stems from the frustration of not being able to communicate. I'm very much with George Bernard Shaw on this one 'why can't the English teach their children how to speak!'. I'm going to do a blog about it one of these days, it makes me so mad!<br /><br />But back to topic. I have to say most of the drunken rabble I have bumped into on nights out have been great fun! Covent Garden and Soho especially, which used to be buzzing with drunken rabble of every nationality, ethnicity and socio economic group, on a Friday night. I'm grinning from ear to ear at the happy memories!Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.com