tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post4817181793961776..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: IN A NUTSHELLRosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger64125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-49813065793938237772019-02-18T04:52:04.887+00:002019-02-18T04:52:04.887+00:00 I also believe beyond reasonable doubt that the p... I also believe beyond reasonable doubt that the parents know that Madeleine disappeared from apt 5A .Thanks for sharing this blog.<br /><br />https://mintingcash.com/category/finance/<br />Ayushi Jainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07097109207955470834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-87789491412388376462019-02-14T17:35:50.802+00:002019-02-14T17:35:50.802+00:00Anon 13 February 2019 at 17:47, 17:52
Thank you k...Anon 13 February 2019 at 17:47, 17:52<br /><br />Thank you kindly for replying.<br /><br />Would you agree that, in the context of our exchange, we could speak of approaching ‘a certainty’ only if we had access to a reliable record of Kate’s saying that she visited departed patients or, alternatively, to a reliable record of such visits?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-80344607941700125722019-02-13T17:52:00.016+00:002019-02-13T17:52:00.016+00:00but i'll try find the link where clarence put ...but i'll try find the link where clarence put that forward to the media as an excuse. Anonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17187534000871902285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-74209968231029028102019-02-13T17:47:31.242+00:002019-02-13T17:47:31.242+00:00the interview where she uses the attending the dea...the interview where she uses the attending the deaths in a gps capacity appears to have been whooshed. but she certainly used that to explain cadaver scent on her trousers...it was not at hospital but residential deaths.Anonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17187534000871902285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-11662004714848288092019-02-13T15:20:08.090+00:002019-02-13T15:20:08.090+00:00@10:25
Could you please post a link to Kate’s say...@10:25<br /><br />Could you please post a link to Kate’s saying that.<br /><br />Thank you<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-20089163960885918172019-02-13T10:25:30.103+00:002019-02-13T10:25:30.103+00:00which begs the question...why did kate have to lie...which begs the question...why did kate have to lie about attending six cadavers to explain the dogs findings? Anonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17187534000871902285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-60325193477193322232019-02-09T19:05:30.401+00:002019-02-09T19:05:30.401+00:00I see that murky petermac is back posting his own ...I see that murky petermac is back posting his own comments on the cesspit. Has anyone got any confirmation that he was a genuine Police Officer - it so what was his rank?<br /><br />He spends an inordinate amount of time looking at photos of a missing girl and passing comments about her appearance etc.<br /><br />I also noted that he made a recent comment on a thread about alleged sex abuse were he said the allegations were more serous that just groping a woman and inappropriate touching of ass etc. As if those things are the norm!<br /><br />Does anyone have any confirmation about who this guy is, his Police rank and history, why he spent a couple of years away from the cesspit (and had his comments posted by havern), why he apparently wrote an ebook that is obviously the work of bennett and why he has been promoted to the rank of "Investigator"?<br /><br />I think it is very important to look into the people who have spent so much time and effort to discredit the Mccanns. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-40602118213164260072019-02-09T18:46:29.344+00:002019-02-09T18:46:29.344+00:00OG has been at it for years so why question if the...OG has been at it for years so why question if they're up to it or not ? They clearly aren't. What exactly does it take to take on the McCanns ? If they're as sure as you and the internet are then it's easy.Or do they need to acknowledge evidence rather than internet gossip and opinion ? The McCanns have been looked after by a series of Prime Ministers and their staff as well as a former politician who has worked for both major parties.How is that them being tricky ?Isn't it someone else being tricky ? And aren't the tricks designed and executed from the same buildings as those who formed and then instructed OG ? If everyone's so sure of the guilt of the parents they should say why exactly.If they're going to come out with the usual mantras ( the dogs don't lie, cadaver, blood, dna, Smith etc etc) Then at least make it sound fresh and include some hypotheses about why either or both police forces never used any of that evidence.Saying it's because the McCanns didn't allow it but controlled it instead not only sounds colossally stupid, it defies logic and common sense.Explain why 12 years hasn't seen an attempt to use all of those little nuggets to build a case. Do ou think that the PJ, the met and their respective prosecution services wouldn't allow them to proceed because no jury would buy buy it ? If so, they must have a good reason.If not-what's the excuse ? They know they're innocent maybe ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-50352943875218145202019-02-09T16:26:11.637+00:002019-02-09T16:26:11.637+00:00It looks like Portugal has long since given up on ...It looks like Portugal has long since given up on this case, they've probably put it down to a tragic accident followed by concealment, and it's not worth the aggro to pursue the grieving parents. It's all up to Operation Grange now, and the big question is, do they have what it takes to take on the McCanns and co and solve this? After all, they've been very tricky customers thus far and they've no intention of ever being prosecuted as proved by their past behaviour, no-one could have fought harder in the attempt to prove abduction than the McCanns.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-9891550310404719942019-02-08T07:39:46.931+00:002019-02-08T07:39:46.931+00:00Anonymous 7 February 2019 at 20:09
You dazzle me....Anonymous 7 February 2019 at 20:09<br /><br />You dazzle me. You speak Bear. You are a bear.<br /><br />Winnie-the-Pooh of the brotherhood of bears.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-48783306238622739782019-02-07T20:12:49.868+00:002019-02-07T20:12:49.868+00:00it appears that Google don't approve of the bl...it appears that Google don't approve of the blogs current topic. It's captcha security isn't allowing postsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-21838135780804246132019-02-07T20:11:02.986+00:002019-02-07T20:11:02.986+00:00Rivers know this: there is no hurry. We shall get ...Rivers know this: there is no hurry. We shall get there some day.<br /><br />—Winnie the PoohAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-84526605636891261542019-02-07T20:09:22.802+00:002019-02-07T20:09:22.802+00:00JG may well love the cameras.But that doesn't ...JG may well love the cameras.But that doesn't mean he can gatecrash any TV programme he likes for whatever he likes.He has to be invited first.Why aren't you questioning who orchestrated it and implying it was a charade ?<br /><br />''Who knows how deep this murky little spider web goes JJ, and I tend to think the time it is taking is an indicator that there will be a lot of defendants.''<br /><br />What's the saying again...united we stand, divided we fall.If that's the case, your 'lot of defendants' are, at the moment, a lot of suspects.Take one down, he'll bring them all.But the only 'pact of silence' ever discussed is the one that fits the arguments of the antis.<br /><br />Police often have what they tell us are 'internal enquiries'. That's a euphemism for damage limitation before we go public.Above them are politicians.Who investigates them ? The police ? I don't think so.This case illustrates the gulf in rank.<br /><br />What you do or don't believe about the continued OG funding is neither here nor there.All signs say it's doing nothing- each year.Wishful thinking is just wishful thinking.<br /><br />You believe a conclusion is in sight.There's two certainties, Bella; each year a request will be made for funding to investigate 'new' or 'crucial' leads and nothing will come of it; the other is that you will blog that you can feel an end in sight or that revelations are about to transpire.And nothing will come of those either.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-39445819760907778942019-02-07T14:51:50.362+00:002019-02-07T14:51:50.362+00:00You put forward a lot of persuasive arguments ther...You put forward a lot of persuasive arguments there JJ which bring me back to those wtf days when Jim Gamble was sat alongside the arguidos on British breakfast tv. The presence of JG seemed to confirm that the British police were fully behind Gerry and Kate, and gave credibility to their fundraising etc. It was truly bizarre, unprecedented even, but JG, like Clarence, loves the camera, and that was probably the decider. We all thought, or were supposed to think, the McCanns couldn't possibly be guilty if the head of CEOP is supporting them so publicly. Some might say, he was pretty positive the McCanns were not going to be charged, ever. <br /><br />Who knows how deep this murky little spider web goes JJ, and I tend to think the time it is taking is an indicator that there will be a lot of defendants. <br /><br />As for police investigating police, it happens JJ. No-one is above the law. Their greatest fear I suspect is humiliation, and if the McCanns are charged, there is a lot heading their way. Some might say, the British police were either supporting a scam or too stupid to know they were supporting a scam. <br /><br />Regardless of all the above however, I don't believe the Home Office is giving OG £150k every six months just to keep the case buried. If a cover up were their objective, all they had to do was seal it off 7 years ago (at the time of the Review) and state nothing to see here. Dragging it on all this time hasn't assisted anyone.<br /><br />I believe a conclusion is in sight JJ, and I suspect there will be many surprises, enough perhaps to knock Brexit and Trump off the front pages for a few days. Cressida Dick has stated there will be a conclusion, former Police Chiefs have been non committal. I'm taking that as a sign.<br /> Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-67847750342609955282019-02-07T10:18:38.280+00:002019-02-07T10:18:38.280+00:00@19:13
Makes you wonder whose giving them the ord...@19:13<br /><br />Makes you wonder whose giving them the orders really.One copper originally set to head up an investigation gets 'warned off' by a senior colleague for wanting to solve it.Then the Portuguese counter part sacked for the same. But oh no...it can't possibly be a political matter. Of course it can't.I'm sure every time a child goes missing the police decide not to solve it from the outset.It's normal procedure I suppose. Oh yes, and if any evidence is found - lose it or say it's no good.All makes sense now.So if you're ever the victim of a crime call MI5 .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-64551377040342035962019-02-06T21:10:43.733+00:002019-02-06T21:10:43.733+00:0013:23
I am liking you. Are you a bear? Could you...13:23<br /><br />I am liking you. Are you a bear? Could you please dazzle me too? <br /><br />Winnie-the-Pooh<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83581474548969956162019-02-06T20:52:19.300+00:002019-02-06T20:52:19.300+00:0019:35 & 19:13
Indeed. (For I am a bear of ver...19:35 & 19:13<br /><br />Indeed. (For I am a bear of very little brain, and long words bother me.)<br /><br />Winnie-the-Poo<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-24129135705333794612019-02-06T19:13:25.689+00:002019-02-06T19:13:25.689+00:00And yet people continue to believe that the police...And yet people continue to believe that the police are investigating this debacle in an appropriate and legal manner. I despair.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-6421904562987372982019-02-05T19:35:57.783+00:002019-02-05T19:35:57.783+00:00Superintendent Hill of Surrey Police/CEOP was in P...Superintendent Hill of Surrey Police/CEOP was in PDL the W/E 5th May<br />confirmed by ACPO/NPIA<br /><br />He was not invited by the Portuguese authorities <br />confirmed by GA and ACPO<br /><br />His activities were therefore illegal and unlawful, what were his motives and who sent him.<br /><br />This activity would be on OG's radar but DCI Redwood/Wall do not have the seniority to investigate.<br /><br />It would require an officer of substantial rank such as Mark Rowley to interview Supt Hill.<br /><br />Who in May 2007 was Hill's superior officer(boss), the very same Mark Rowley. The delay with OG is an obvious conflict of interest and confusion, with senior officers needing to investigate themselves.<br /><br />Kick the can down the road, £150k every few months is peanuts to save police and politicians blushes.<br /><br />The Macs have been supported legally and illegally by UK police officers from day one. Why does anyone expect it to change.<br /><br />Dishonesty is rife within the hierarchy of the UK police just check the records<br />The Leics Asst Chief Constable in 2010 committed suicide while awaiting court appearances for perverting the course of justice fraud and gross misconduct. What a fine standard he must have set his force.<br />JJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-68439598712150527692019-02-05T18:52:54.621+00:002019-02-05T18:52:54.621+00:00'' I was astonished that two people, who w...'' I was astonished that two people, who were so obviously lying, were being given so many interviews, and so many tabloid front covers. And when I first went online, I was heartened to see that I was not alone, thousands, if not millions, could see what I could see. ''<br /><br />How did you know they were 'obviously lying ' ? You couldn't have known.You guessed.You could only draw on the knowledge of other separate unrelated cases and then decide it was similar enough to say the parents did it. That isn't how detection of crime works.That you found thousands online who shared your astonishment is evidence of how the saturation of true crime documentaries have caught on. With it being so 'obvious' were you not also 'astonished' that nobody was arrested ? That the police were missing the 'obvious' ?<br /><br />''The McCanns themselves created this massive worldwide audience, but it backfired on them, because they couldn't control it''<br /><br />The media created the worldwide audience, actually.The McCanns was their attraction.They never controlled it at any point.Remember Clarence ? Media controller ?<br /><br />The media has served the Tory and the Labour cause in the case.The big photographs; the dramatic but inaccurate 'new leads'.The sensational and meaningless quotes.All sell papers and make money and all sustain the illusion of the great 'mystery'.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-71316143541796244262019-02-05T18:39:40.800+00:002019-02-05T18:39:40.800+00:00Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton5 February 2019 at 14:...Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton5 February 2019 at 14:36<br /><br />''If I had no knowledge of libel laws, you would have shut me down years ago Ziggy. Having a book 'legally read' by the lawyers of a major publisher, is a huge learning curve Ziggy,''<br /><br />Oh dear, Bella. What happened there ? I interjected to let you know you had mistaken somebody else for me and you came back with this odd post. Why tell me about libel laws and why suggest that I would have you or anyone else shut down had i the power to ? It relates to nothing I said. It seems to relate more to paranoia.<br /><br />''I have always been able to dance around negative posters such as yourself. I have been fighting pro McCann trolls for nearly 12 years''<br /><br />And here we go yet again.....<br /><br />I have read you say many times that you have an undying faith in the inherent goodness in people.In human nature.A somewhat positive if unrealistic attitude.But if you're sincere, fair enough.I don't share your vision.However, in all things McCann, i have stated that no proof exists that the child is dead.OK, realistically she probably is but we don't know.I hold out hope, nothing more.Where there's life, there's hope.But you call me a 'negative poster'. So how does my hoping against hope that the child is alive make me negative in your 'everyone is good at heart' philosophy ?Does that philosophy take a back seat when the McCanns come into your cross hairs ? And what is your definition of an internet troll ?Is it the same as that of people who understand the meaning or is it just someone who poses questions that challenge something you believe? Why do you always bring Brenda Leyland into your arguments ? Allow the lady some dignity.And please, don't drag my name into an arena filled with complete morons who engage in online sick stupidity. it's cheap, it's tacky and it's uncalled for.All i did was present an opposing opinion of this case and state the official statements of the state of play.<br /><br />The judge in the supreme court made a ruling that stated that Amaral's book would be allowed to hit the shelves but the caveat was that it is because it is a 'literary work' not a book of facts.It isn't my fault the judge said that. All I did was remind you of it. How people 'choose' to read it is their business.But, if they choose to read it as fact they are incorrect. As such their comments based on the book can only be an agreement of one or more opinions as composed by the author.So they would be stating opinions.Nothing more.<br /><br />That it took Leveson to remove your blinkers where the media are concerned and that our two- party political system is a sham is evidence that your eyes still have some opening to do yet.But, it's never too late. The rest of your post needs no comment from me as it doesn't apply to me.You have addressed the post of someone else and decided he or she is me.Again.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-32658362689228373282019-02-05T16:26:07.619+00:002019-02-05T16:26:07.619+00:00Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton5 February 2019 at 15:...Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton5 February 2019 at 15:51<br /><br />''Simply by refusing to acknowledge the alerts of the dogs, the McCanns were trying to erase this evidence from the narrative. Kate in her book, says that when shown the videos of the dogs, she sat and chanted 'f***ing to**er'. This was a woman determined, as you are, to write the dog alerts out of the narrative. Kudos to you for not giving up though.''<br /><br />Please read this slowly....<br /><br />It doesn't matter one way or another what your opinion is of the dogs' findings.The same goes for my opinion. The McCanns opinion doesn't matter either.The only opinion that matters is the one agreed upon by the PJ and the met and them all jointly.It wouldn't matter who was-or is- determined about the findings unless they are a police officer working on the case.Nobody can make the evidence go away.Not me, you or a McCann.But, if it is that crucial why has it taken 12 years and annual financial top ups to continue NOT to use any of it ?<br /><br />'' 'they know the forensics will never be used and no confession will happen'. That's quite a sweeping statement. Are you speaking on behalf of the McCanns or Scotland Yard.''<br /><br />I'm speaking from a position of cool detachment and explaining logic. The forensics won't transform into usable evidence magically after 12 years.And a confession won't come now. Why would it ?<br /><br />''Again, I reiterate, your dream that all the evidence collected in 2007 has been discarded, remains a dream. ''<br /><br />Not discard, i have never said that.It's still in a fridge being ignored.So, who's really dreaming here ?<br /><br />''At this time Ziggy, the parents of Madeleine are being far too quiet and far too accepting of whatever the police are telling them.''<br /><br />What are they being told ? have they been told anything other than the search goes on ? Why would they not be quiet? Not everyone obsessively commits every iota of their day to social networks.<br /><br />''the ultimate goal of the McCanns is to discover what happened to Madeleine.''<br /><br />Probably.<br /><br />''Except it isn't. ''<br /><br />Oh, ok.<br /><br />''they are now totally indifferent to it (the investigation) being shut down.''<br /><br />When i answered you about what the McCanns must be thinking, i told you it was only what I imagine.That's because nobody but the McCanns know. Where's your proof that they are indifferent if none of us could know ?<br /><br />''Finally, this case has little to do with a rats nest of rich privileged arse holes. In this instance, the elite upper classes are not involved.''<br /><br />How do you know ?<br /><br />''You claim to have no stake in the McCann, you want us to believe you are no more than a curious member of society who leans towards the McCanns' innocence. Firstly, I would say, why lie? Why not introduce yourself as the honest broker your purport to be? ''<br /><br />I claim it because it's true.Your paranoia won't change that.I'm on the side of justice.If they turn out to be guilty you can pass me a pitchfork if you have a spare.Innocent until proven guilty is preferable to vigilante spite. Because I ask you simple questions and make simple requests that you struggle to meet you resort to name calling or desperate accusations regarding things you couldn't possibly have any knowledge of.It looks desperate.The fate of the McCanns-and this case- has become far too big in your life.<br /><br />''From a personal perspective, I think it is cowardly to hide, it's like you do not have the courage of your convictions.''<br /><br />I told you over a year ago, i don't hide.Not in the real world.But on line i trust very little and very few.But, as i said back then, anyone who thinks i cower or hide is welcome to arrive in my fair city and let me know where they are.They can even bring their insults and name calling.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-89040807964387639122019-02-05T15:51:06.361+00:002019-02-05T15:51:06.361+00:00Simply by refusing to acknowledge the alerts of th...Simply by refusing to acknowledge the alerts of the dogs, the McCanns were trying to erase this evidence from the narrative. Kate in her book, says that when shown the videos of the dogs, she sat and chanted 'f***ing to**er'. This was a woman determined, as you are, to write the dog alerts out of the narrative. Kudos to you for not giving up though.<br /><br />Let me back up for a moment however, 'they know the forensics will never be used and no confession will happen'. That's quite a sweeping statement. Are you speaking on behalf of the McCanns or Scotland Yard.<br /><br />Again, I reiterate, your dream that all the evidence collected in 2007 has been discarded, remains a dream. <br /><br />Do the McCanns want closure? They are hardly banging on police doors demanding answers. Again, I cite the multitude of crime documents I have seen, the parents, and it's usually the parents, of the missing, never give the police a moment's peace. Are Gerry and Kate harassing the police? Have they ever harassed the police for answers? If not, why not? <br /><br />At this time Ziggy, the parents of Madeleine are being far too quiet and far too accepting of whatever the police are telling them. Again, this ring alarm bells on a behaviour scale. That is their behaviour flies off what is accepted as normality. <br /><br />Strip away everything, the cascade of tabloid front pages, the daily controversy, the trolls who attack them on twitter, etc, etc, etc, the ultimate goal of the McCanns is to discover what happened to Madeleine.<br /><br />Except it isn't. Having fought so hard for a review, which, lucky them, turned into a full blown investigation, they are now totally indifferent to it (the investigation) being shut down.<br /><br />That makes no sense. They know that in a private capacity 'searching', they will have nowhere near the resources of Scotland Yard. I suspect the only reason the McCanns want to see the investigation closed or put on a shelf to go cold, is because they are the subjects.<br /><br />Finally, this case has little to do with a rats nest of rich privileged arse holes. In this instance, the elite upper classes are not involved. This is crime constructed and run by working class professionals 'dun good'. A small group of wide boys living out their dreams around a bottle of free wine by the poolside.<br /><br />You claim to have no stake in the McCann, you want us to believe you are no more than a curious member of society who leans towards the McCanns' innocence. Firstly, I would say, why lie? Why not introduce yourself as the honest broker your purport to be? <br /><br />Even if you are a member of the McCann or Healy clans, so what? If you are it would add at least some credibility to your posts. I really do not understand why vocal supports of the McCanns are so reluctant to reveal their identities. What is it that you/they fear? <br /><br />From a personal perspective, I think it is cowardly to hide, it's like you do not have the courage of your convictions. And, it must be said, if you can't put your name to it, it is worthless. It's like saying, I will support you but I don't want anyone to know. Being a straight talker, my response would be 'well f*ck you, if you can't stand beside me, go away'. The McCanns continue to be happy with the nameless running their website and FB page however, where the rest of us would feel insulted.<br /><br />They are funny old clans to be sure. All rushing out to the rescue in PDL, but quiet ever since. <br /><br /> Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-69638787664163116582019-02-05T14:53:56.629+00:002019-02-05T14:53:56.629+00:00I have hit several watersheds throughout the cours...I have hit several watersheds throughout the course of my life, and this case is among the most significant. I felt I had been catapulted from the friendly, love and trust each other swinging sixties of Harold Wilson, into a nightmare new world, where everything I ever believed in was falling apart. <br /><br />I was astonished that two people, who were so obviously lying, were being given so many interviews, and so many tabloid front covers. And when I first went online, I was heartened to see that I was not alone, thousands, if not millions, could see what I could see. <br /><br />The McCanns themselves created this massive worldwide audience, but it backfired on them, because they couldn't control it. They have discovered much to their chagrin, that Rebekah et al, will go for whatever creates the biggest news sensation. She is neither pro nor anti McCann, she is pro selling newspapers.Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-70919653176880157252019-02-05T14:36:09.582+00:002019-02-05T14:36:09.582+00:00Actually, it is incredible how much I get right, a...Actually, it is incredible how much I get right, and how much my readers return again and again to read the truth about the missing Madeleine case. My readers know that I will not lie to them and that they are in fact accompanying me on the same journey to enlightenment. <br /><br />If I had no knowledge of libel laws, you would have shut me down years ago Ziggy. Having a book 'legally read' by the lawyers of a major publisher, is a huge learning curve Ziggy, That and my decades working for lawyers taught me every trick and loophole to avoid legally. Ergo I have always been able to dance around negative posters such as yourself. I have been fighting pro McCann trolls for nearly 12 years, I have seen how desperate they are to get a shock horror tabloid headline out of those who criticise them online. Remember 'bang bang' and Brenda Leyland. If you and your ilk could drag me over hot legal coals, you would in a nanosecond. <br /><br />No.5. 'No authority in the world has proceeded with GA's theory'. Lol. How can that be anything other than a wild guess? You have deluded yourself that all the evidence collected in the summer of 2007 has been discarded. In this instance you are revealing the madness of one. You are in cuckoo land if you think the original interrupted investigation has been set aside from the current investigations by OG and the PJ. <br /><br />Returning to point 2. I'm not among those who claim to have solved this case from their armchairs. One of the 'hooks' for this case is the unexpected surprises along the way, and I have no doubt the finale will surprise us all.<br /><br />I'm not daft enough to paint myself into a corner like Bennett, HideHo and Textusa. They reached conclusions 12 years ago, and are still having to defend them, the truth however, will render all their labours worthless.<br /><br />I put forward my views, my opinions and my conclusions where appropriate. I do not use the term 'beyond reasonable doubt' lightly, for all that I am a rebel and wannabe revolutionary, my moral compass is aligned with the law. <br /><br />Tis true Ziggy, you are not among those who zone in on statements I make that may be considered libellous. Your interests lie elsewhere, such as, persuading readers that Goncalo Amaral's 'Truth of the Lie' must, by law, be read as a work of fiction not fact. From a rebuttal perspective, you're winning no-one there. People tend to read books exactly as they choose, and a book written by the former detective who actually headed the original investigation into this case WILL be taken as factual, despite what any Judge or a McCann parrot might say. <br /><br />Given the knowledge I have acquired along the way Ziggy, I do not consider the last 12 years of my life a waste of time. This wasn't just one rabbit hole, it was a multitude. I remember watching head of CEOP Jim Gamble sitting alongside Gerry and Kate on the breakfast sofas and thinking, well they must be innocent if they have chief of police sitting alongside them. Now, I wonder how I was ever that naïve. <br /><br />To add salt to this wound, it was post my degree, I was supposedly an educated woman. Heck, I had even taught media at GCSE and A-level. Of course I knew at the time that media was owned and controlled by billionaire newspaper owners, but it wasn't until Leveson that I knew how closely entwined these media moguls were with our leaders, labour or tory. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.com