tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post576885778973567040..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: A MATTER OF NEGLECTRosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger104125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-72207648532664053022016-01-24T23:55:35.159+00:002016-01-24T23:55:35.159+00:00@ Ros, 22 Jan, 7.30 I can't say why Mrs Fenn ...@ Ros, 22 Jan, 7.30 I can't say why Mrs Fenn lied (if she did), but I find it more than a tad suspicious that the British press, fed no doubt by Clarence Mitchell, printed a wodge of stories several days before she gave her statement, predicting exactly what she was going to say! And then as soon as she made her statement, she was seen on TV stating: "Ignore it - it's a load of rubbish!" I also find it unbelievable that she heard a child crying for 75 minutes yet no-one else did, and she did nothing, not even a 'phone call (except one to her friend Mrs Glyn), neither of them did anything. Also, did the twins sleep through Madeleine crying? Surely they would have woken up as well?? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-52040165121200021092016-01-24T19:26:23.298+00:002016-01-24T19:26:23.298+00:00The Devil is in the detail, so they say (God if yo...The Devil is in the detail, so they say (God if you'd rather):<br /><br />http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-48692874118318218702016-01-23T12:49:26.623+00:002016-01-23T12:49:26.623+00:00But Christobell this is like saying that all that ...But Christobell this is like saying that all that was done up until Gonçalo Amaral had to leave the case is enough. Nothing more could be done, and all GAs conclusions are final. Which is dead wrong to say. Remember that someone continued the work? Paolo Rebelo is his name. It's a shame he has landed in the background of all this. It's as if GA was the only one ever working with this, which is not true. If the investigations hadn't been shelved they would sooner or later have come to the issues mentioned above; The Last Photo, Nuno Lourenco (and the other guy's polish name I can't spell right now), Plus many more things. To reduce this by saying "all armchairs detectives are wrong" is the same as saying we might just as well give up trying to find outwhat really happened. I'm afraid I don't have much hope when it comes to Op Grange. But who knows. Whoever or whatever contributes to this case being solved, I'm sure PeterMac and others (yes, HideHo and Tony Bennett too) will see that they were right about quite a LOT of things. Dr Martin Roberts insightful posts during all years contain a big part of the truth as well. The disappearence of Madeleine McCann is like no other missing case. Never never ever this is something limited to the Tapas gang. It would have been solved a long time ago if it was all about a couple of families on a simple holiday...You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist (I'm not!!) to see that this involves more than 9 adults.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-32749500449406369382016-01-23T08:52:16.576+00:002016-01-23T08:52:16.576+00:00I can see how intriguing all these theories can be...I can see how intriguing all these theories can be 08:28, but the truth is, they are working in the dark. Though I respect Dr. Martin Roberts, I don't always agree with him, and the minutiae, such as the pyjamas, is not my area of interest. I used to respect PeterMac, up until he became fixated on the last photo and took the 'I'm right, dead right' stance. People who insist they are 'dead right' are a complete turn off for me. They might just as well be walking through life with blinkers on. <br /><br />As for Richard Hall and his (or more accurately, Bennett's)bizarre need to find perpetrators OUTSIDE of the tapas group - well that's 4 hours I will never get back! Doh! Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-68425408473653550482016-01-23T08:39:44.712+00:002016-01-23T08:39:44.712+00:00I'm afraid I have developed a bit of a phobia,...I'm afraid I have developed a bit of a phobia, or more accurately, writer's block when it comes to forums and facebook groups. I hate being censored and I get hopping mad when threads are locked. I put a lot of time and thought into my writing and seeing 'removed by administrator' is like a dagger to the heart. <br /><br />The majority of the stuff that I write here would not get past the admin and moderators of most, if not all, of the 'organised' groups. I was banned from the large facebook groups a long, long, time ago. Apparently there is only ONE way to fight for justice for poor little Madeleine (slagging off the parents and other antis) and if you are not part of it, you become the new enemy. <br /><br />I'm afraid I don't 'get' group mentality and writing to appease the delicate sensibilities of small, dedicated groups of outraged citizens, has no appeal for me whatsoever. I'm not in the business of telling soothing, bedtime stories.<br /><br />I have a mischievous nature. I discovered at a very early age that sending prim and proper old ladies reaching for the gin and the smelling salts was great fun. I had a pet mouse I kept in my pocket. Shock and outrage are what I am usually going for! As you can see, this makes posting on forums somewhat difficult.<br /><br />Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-64144753718853605782016-01-23T08:28:34.882+00:002016-01-23T08:28:34.882+00:00Ros, We actually know most of what's in the PJ...Ros, We actually know most of what's in the PJ files. And we've read Goncalo's book. But you must agree there's a wealth of research out there which has opened all kinds of new issues which Goncalo never had the opportunity to address. Take three examples: Dr Martin Roberts on Maddie's pyjamas, PeterMac on the Last Photo, and Richard Hall's look at Nuno Lourenco's obviously bogus claim of a kidnapping at Sagres. These and other articles makes us 'think again' about what happened and when. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-40972066816749628012016-01-23T07:28:56.261+00:002016-01-23T07:28:56.261+00:00You say Goncalo Amaral couldn't possibly know ...You say Goncalo Amaral couldn't possibly know about 'the depth of deception and planning that went on.......' as if the armchair detectives, with only a fraction of the information he had, have solved this crime from their living rooms and studies. <br /><br />Do you have any idea how ridiculous that sounds? I can't help but wonder about the motives of some of these armchair detectives. It seems to me that they are out to trash the evidence of the Portuguese police and implicate people outside of the tapas group. The real question is why? Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-81404524345074288432016-01-22T23:08:00.017+00:002016-01-22T23:08:00.017+00:00To be fair to all forums, there isn't much McC...To be fair to all forums, there isn't much McCann news at the moment for them to talk about.<br /><br />Yes, there have been a lot of comments about the Jill Havern forum but the majority of them were to challenge the less than honest things said there about the new forum. I really do hope that all the unpleasantness is in the past now.<br /><br />As a matter of interest, who are those you liked who have now left?Kathynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-68866295732666430962016-01-22T23:07:10.605+00:002016-01-22T23:07:10.605+00:0022 Jan 22.19 Yes. When Kate talks about that week...22 Jan 22.19 Yes. When Kate talks about that week in Praia da Luz, it's 'The FIVE of us did this', 'The FIVE of us did that', 'The THREE children this' and so on. It's far far too obvious. We must stop being blinded by Goncalo Amaral's declaration in his book that Madeleine died after 6pm on 3rd May. He only had 5 months on the job and could not possibly have been aware of the depth of deception and planning that went on from whatever happened on Sunday until 10pm Thursday. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-77336378456724734212016-01-22T22:19:05.898+00:002016-01-22T22:19:05.898+00:0022 Jan 18.24. Agree with you entirely. Whatever ha...22 Jan 18.24. Agree with you entirely. Whatever happened, happened not too long after that Last Photo. The following days are like a fabricated diary made to look as real as possible. Just as the Tennis Balls Photo, Another piece of 'evidence' trying very hard (über-) to persuade us all that Madeleine indeed was THERE and THEN. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-49719943017468875942016-01-22T18:24:41.580+00:002016-01-22T18:24:41.580+00:0022 Jan, 8.16 The funny thing about the Last Phot...22 Jan, 8.16 The funny thing about the Last Photo is that it probably IS the Last Photo. But taken on Sunday! I don't personally rate the Tennis Balls Photo as genuine. Two different people took it - and on two different days?? Pull the other one!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-69383170003025367972016-01-22T18:20:52.870+00:002016-01-22T18:20:52.870+00:00@ Kathy I think it's unfair to refer to '...@ Kathy I think it's unfair to refer to 'a few old hags', though I agree (I was a member of candyfloss's) that there was a huge amount of bile on that forum. My assessment is that most of them there just liked a good old gossip. The main subject of interest was always Jill Havern's forum. From what I could see, they spent a lot more time looking at that and spitting feathers at it than doing any serious research themselves. Today you'll be lucky to see any public posts, 90% of their gossiping is done in private these days. They used to boast that 'all of the good posters' were now with them (!), but the few who were worth reading left there months ago. A few old stagers like Chatelaine, dogs don't lie and dear old Mimi keep the whole thing staggering on. Not seen you Ros on there for yonks Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-982079751534769592016-01-22T10:40:52.139+00:002016-01-22T10:40:52.139+00:00My post at 22.22 yesterday was supposed to appear ...My post at 22.22 yesterday was supposed to appear after Andrew's at 19.52. On reflection, he can't have seen the worst of the abuse as it was deleted for being on a level with Twitter trolls.<br /><br />I cannot believe that anyone who saw those posts would have respect for the people responsible.Kathynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-90448045815436261002016-01-22T08:16:36.829+00:002016-01-22T08:16:36.829+00:00Yes 12.48, it certainly is the most ridiculous the...Yes 12.48, it certainly is the most ridiculous theory imaginable!! I reached the same decision after I had read that post. Not that I enjoyed the riddle-like texts she produced before...and it's an even bigger riddle how people possibly admire her. I admit this case is anything but simple and therefore it gets more and more pointless to try to 'keep it simple'. That's why it's not been solved, everyone in this mess (and there are far more than just the Tapas9) have complex relations but somehow they are connected to the disappearence of Madeleine. Textusa tries to find this common denominator by making things even more un-simple. She puts more ingredients to it just to complicate things further. Photo shopping glasses.....swinging etc etc<br />I also stick to PeterMac's analysis regarding the Last Photo. No need to complicate things further in an already complex case. The McCann's purpose was (and is) to make people believe their daughter was alive and well on Thursday afternoon. That's why that photo at the pool is getting über-emphasis.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-14669233938029055262016-01-22T07:30:41.846+00:002016-01-22T07:30:41.846+00:00What possible reason could Mrs Fenn have for lying...What possible reason could Mrs Fenn have for lying 09:36? Bearing in mind a child's life was at stake and she could face charges of perverting the course of justice?Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-50687133484881858262016-01-21T22:22:17.184+00:002016-01-21T22:22:17.184+00:00The only reason the forum was imploding at that ti...The only reason the forum was imploding at that time was because of the bile coming from a few old hags. As you supported them, you cannot possibly not have a problem with Cristobell. That is why your decision to post here is most peculiar. Kathynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-898146323062679712016-01-21T22:15:52.999+00:002016-01-21T22:15:52.999+00:0017 Jan 12.48 I think there are still some posters...17 Jan 12.48 I think there are still some posters out there who think the Last Photo was photoshopped. PeterMac (who used to post on Havern's and candyfloss's) got two expert opinions. I can only find one of them, it was from Prof Hany Farid, from Columbia University I think. He wrote: <br /><br />"I have taken an initial look at the image. The artifacts eluded to in the pdf document that you sent are simply JPEG compression artifacts (as described here: http://www.fourandsix.com/blog/2011/6/29/that-looks-fake.html). If you magnify other parts of the image you will see similar artifacts. I also performed a forensic analysis to determine if the lighting and the shadows on the people and background are consistent -- they are. I see no other anomalies in the photo. So, at first glance, I see no evidence of photo tampering. <br /><br />I will add that it is fairly easy to change dates in an image's metadata or for these dates to be wrong. As such these dates should not be solely relied upon".<br /><br />Textusa is a dyed-in-the-wool ardent advocate of the photoshopping theory and has posted the most ridiculous theory imaginable of how it was photoshopped. She thinks that 2 weeks after Maddie disappeared, Gerry and Amelie pitched up at the Ocean Club for a photo-shoot to create the Last Photo. I always thought that many of Textusa's theories were quite crazy. But after reading that load of twaddle, I have given up reading her outpourings altogether <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-77054492664192292022016-01-21T21:30:21.584+00:002016-01-21T21:30:21.584+00:00Hello Andrew,
Maybe I got it all wrong, but didn&...Hello Andrew,<br /><br />Maybe I got it all wrong, but didn't you admit that you actually had called Tony early in the morning? Obviously he felt that as some kind of threat. May I ask if there is something more personal between you and him? I remember you had some disagreements back when you were a member on jillhavern. But surely those different opinions can't be the reason alone why you keep writing extremely negative things about him...<br />Yes I know he can be very "stubborn" when he makes his arguments and longwinded explanations, but it's not fair to say that he is making up things. Has he made up things about you? Again, I may not recall things as they were...but he probably just told others about those calls you made which made him feel uncomfortable.<br /><br />I know you want truth and justice for Madeleine, and I feel somehow even though I don't know you, that you are a nice person:-) So is Christobell for giving us this space. I enjoy reading her blog. Wish I could write like that!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-63586818410590317922016-01-21T20:03:46.969+00:002016-01-21T20:03:46.969+00:00Yes, 07: 50.
Tony Bennett made up some ridiculous...Yes, 07: 50.<br /><br />Tony Bennett made up some ridiculous nonsense that i threatened him, or whatever rubbish he spouted, so of course got a ban.<br /><br />Ive lost my voice in trying to find truth and justice for Madeleine because some silly old sod posted lies about me. And not for the first time.<br /><br />What a pratt. He said 3 months ago the police would take 6 weeks to track me down (even though i spoke to them the next day after his rubbish and gave them all my details). 3 months later and cant post on MMM because of his fairytales. The guy is an absolute weirdo. Poor chap. I actually genuinely feel sorry for him. Must be horrible to end up like that with severe mental problems. <br /><br />Regards, Andrew.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-66672150727303046742016-01-21T19:52:19.851+00:002016-01-21T19:52:19.851+00:00.... will try again to post.
Kathy -Apologies. Go....... will try again to post.<br /><br />Kathy -Apologies. Got caught up with the heat of the moment at that time. Don't have a problem with CB or anyone, well apart from the old goat, Tony, who gets his kicks in his latter years to make up stuff about me.<br /><br />Yes, i did respect those 'who flounced'. DFM, Resistor and Susible were 3 of the best posters on that forum. I cared a lot about that forum and it was imploding. Hence why i stepped in but shouldnt of done. <br /><br />Not been the same place since and if you are a member Kathy, then you would know that.<br /><br />Best wishes and sorry if upset you for placing the odd comment on here.<br /><br />No issue with Cristobell and likewise im sure she hasnt one with me either.<br /><br />As said before, i just want truth and justice for poor Madeleine.<br /><br />Regards, Andrew.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-22882873134038627322016-01-21T09:30:53.180+00:002016-01-21T09:30:53.180+00:00I do not know why Andrew posts here as he was host...I do not know why Andrew posts here as he was hostile towards Cristobell while he was on that forum. He supported some really unpleasant posters who were abusive to her, describing them as a loss to the forum when thankfully they flounced off for good. Kathynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-79104685608885434932016-01-21T09:30:51.160+00:002016-01-21T09:30:51.160+00:00At 21:25 This is where I copied it from
www.gerr...At 21:25 This is where I copied it from<br /><br />www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk › DEATHSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-88378242229037774682016-01-21T07:50:34.553+00:002016-01-21T07:50:34.553+00:00Hi Andrew. Not seen you posting on candyfloss'...Hi Andrew. Not seen you posting on candyfloss's forum for a long time. Are you still banned from there?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-16894400217147480262016-01-20T21:25:45.787+00:002016-01-20T21:25:45.787+00:0019:44. Whats the source... Please dont say the Su...19:44. Whats the source... Please dont say the Sun or Tony sodding Bennett...<br /><br />Regards, Andrew.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-27658632664373321572016-01-20T19:44:43.569+00:002016-01-20T19:44:43.569+00:00There you go Andrew!
PAMELA FENN (Neighbour) Year...There you go Andrew!<br /><br />PAMELA FENN (Neighbour) Year 2007<br />Ex-pat Pamela Fenn, a widow in her 70s. She claims she "scared off" an intruder who had broken into her apartment in the days before the McCanns arrived to stay in the holiday flat directly below her. Mrs Fenn has told friends she heard a noise as she watched television and found a man escaping through her bedroom window. Her niece, who was staying with her, also saw the man. The widow reported the incident to police but claims no one contacted her after Madeleine vanished - until two weeks ago, when British detectives called on her. Mrs Fenn's niece is travelling to Portugal from the UK next week to be interviewed by the Policia Judiciaria. Mrs Fenn is also said to have heard the McCann children crying two nights before Madeleine's disappearance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com