tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post6093687133471324329..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: MADELEINE'S DISAPPEARANCE AND NEW LABOURRosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger87125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-81575786811010163972018-08-31T18:33:24.740+01:002018-08-31T18:33:24.740+01:00Anonymous 29 August 2018 at 23:57
:)
TAnonymous 29 August 2018 at 23:57<br /><br />:)<br /><br />TAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-23489486934748936832018-08-29T23:57:11.243+01:002018-08-29T23:57:11.243+01:00There's too many of most of you. Begone from w...There's too many of most of you. Begone from whence you came.Close the door on your way.You're absolute beginners.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-12898376957734907602018-08-16T11:56:21.866+01:002018-08-16T11:56:21.866+01:00Only one of me too.Only one of me too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-18594410574135329502018-08-16T10:51:42.502+01:002018-08-16T10:51:42.502+01:00@ 09:07
There is only one of me@ 09:07<br />There is only one of meAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-8117915883057559892018-08-16T09:07:48.277+01:002018-08-16T09:07:48.277+01:00So much for blog hits then.
There are only half a ...So much for blog hits then.<br />There are only half a dozen posters with mutiple id's.(if indeed that many).<br />With delusions of grandeur too by the sound of it.<br />Dr Jeckyll and many Hyde's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-11556285282125679362018-08-16T08:20:53.319+01:002018-08-16T08:20:53.319+01:00@06:30
Concur.
T@06:30<br /><br />Concur.<br /><br />TAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-87592951421400615862018-08-16T06:30:49.001+01:002018-08-16T06:30:49.001+01:00Anonymous14 August 2018 at 17:33
Absolutely, part...Anonymous14 August 2018 at 17:33<br /><br />Absolutely, particularly in a virtual environment! The writers are free to write what they want. The readers are free to make their minds up about what they read. I do it all the time.<br /><br />If one is marvellous, why should it be problematic for anyone to say so? It wasn’t for Oscar Wilde.<br /><br />If you are marvellous, I’ll be delighted to hear about it, provided you tell me about it in a way I find interesting. And you can pretend to be anyone/anything. <br /><br />The public is wonderfully tolerant: it forgives everything except genius. But you are different, aren’t you?<br /><br />Why did you ask, dear?<br /><br />Jesus<br /><br />PS T is absolutely marvellous, marvellous, marvellous!!!!!! He must be a bit busy at the moment.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-56040870090844321832018-08-14T17:33:01.555+01:002018-08-14T17:33:01.555+01:00@ T
So if I write lots of comments in the third pe...@ T<br />So if I write lots of comments in the third person saying how marvellous I am giving the impression that someone else wrote it,then that is fine and should be judged as such?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-50787165341676265532018-08-14T15:16:39.655+01:002018-08-14T15:16:39.655+01:00Anonymous 6 August 2018 at 19:58
Point taken. Gu...Anonymous 6 August 2018 at 19:58<br /><br />Point taken. Guilty as charged. I’ll look into the problem with my replies.<br /><br />Peace.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-40619266991105321212018-08-14T14:45:33.043+01:002018-08-14T14:45:33.043+01:00Re Anonymous 6 August 2018 at 19:58
Writing in th...Re Anonymous 6 August 2018 at 19:58<br /><br />Writing in the grammatical third person is a literary device.<br /><br />The writer’s comments should be judged on their merit<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-952393877656897332018-08-13T17:29:11.587+01:002018-08-13T17:29:11.587+01:00Ziggy writing comments praising himself?
Ha,ha,ha...Ziggy writing comments praising himself?<br />Ha,ha,ha,I've heard it all now.<br />Not such a great Zigmeister after all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-25486375047397853652018-08-13T15:54:02.879+01:002018-08-13T15:54:02.879+01:00@10:51
He has.:) It's me.:) I'm not nea...@10:51<br /><br />He has.:) It's me.:) I'm not nearly as good.:( Sometimes we disagree.:) But we get by with a smile without difficuly.:) We have different parents.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-85593100390536387332018-08-13T15:36:26.419+01:002018-08-13T15:36:26.419+01:00Lol. Busted!
Ziggy's cross dressing twin bro...Lol. Busted!<br /><br />Ziggy's cross dressing twin brother Lady Sawdust!<br /><br />And he was awful nice.Really quite out of sight.....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-22659590252195835052018-08-13T10:51:24.376+01:002018-08-13T10:51:24.376+01:006th August 19:58
Sounds very like ziggy to me.
Alm...6th August 19:58<br />Sounds very like ziggy to me.<br />Almost as if he wrote it.<br />Maybe he has a twin brother? ;)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-69320254434783791832018-08-06T19:58:21.177+01:002018-08-06T19:58:21.177+01:00Poor old Ros....
Brexit ? New Labour? Karma unfol...Poor old Ros....<br /><br />Brexit ? New Labour? Karma unfolding? Obsess much, old girl ?<br /><br /> You're persuading a few narrow minded haters with the obligatory snipes at Ziggy.That's no great achievement.That you still do it tends to suggest that he hit you and your faithful often enough and hard enough without a decent rebuttal so all you have is the trademark ad hominem digs and total lack of subtlety.Then subtlety wouldn't work down the shallow end of the pool where your faithful paddle.Those with a more open and balanced mind were persuaded not only by so me of his points but by a lot of other points he exposed as having no basis in truth. He made a lot of sense and did it often.He took all criticisms, including the idiotic ones,and answered in full.Unfortunately he asked some pertinent questions to those who had the McCanns bang to rights but they wouldn't reply.So, he gets accused of being about 10 different people, an 'insider' or member of 'the inner circle'.That's pitiful as an argument, not to mention laughably paranoid.I'd say he used a limited number of persuasive arguments because that's all he needed.If nobody had a solid counter to them why expand ?<br /><br />This blog is tying all kinds to the McCanns because each theory is weak and getting weaker.200 weak theories don't make a strong case.A small amount of feasible theories that withstand attack or critical counter argument do.But, good theories that don't have the McCanns as guilty are red rags to bulls here.You have called a few extremely antagonistic posters ( one being of Scandinavian descent) who rarely make sense and wear blindfolds over their blinkers 'towering intellects'( Ros speak for 'people who see things as i see them') .They think the McCanns are guilty and what they spout is only of secondary importance to you.Zig always delighted in challenging them( and you) and is frequently referred to as 'uneducated' or 'semi educated'.You self-reference constantly with regard to your (perceived) high intellect, yet he ran rings around you just for fun. And still you your faithul puppies use the good old ad hominem insults when you have no argument.Your smarter readers know the score.You should read more and learn.Until you do, at least change the record. You shouldn't still be rattled by what he said, but your inability to resist the childish snipes illustrate that you clearly are.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-4790237575356932422018-08-06T11:32:45.389+01:002018-08-06T11:32:45.389+01:00No, most active paedophiles do not do ordinary job...No, most active paedophiles do not do ordinary jobs, they choose jobs where they have access to children. Childrens Homes were full of them, so too all forms of child protection. Try asking a few careleavers.<br /><br />I demolished your butcher, baker, candlestick maker theory several posts back, and your response? To call me stupid. I'm far from stupid 09:46, and that's what irks you.Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-7839604720025972612018-08-06T09:46:39.131+01:002018-08-06T09:46:39.131+01:00Two women a week in the UK are killed by partners ...Two women a week in the UK are killed by partners or former partners. In more than 75% of cases of child murder the culprit is a parent or quasi-parent. Most paedophiles do ordinary jobs and abuse the children who are near and available to them. <br />This is all confirmed by evidence, freely available.<br /><br />But Ros knows better.<br /><br />In fact, Ros, characterising paedophiles as you do puts children at greater risk. I’ve no objection to your being stupid, but I do wish you would keep your stupid to yourself. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-12135519697895748502018-08-05T22:21:09.874+01:002018-08-05T22:21:09.874+01:00It is indeed a step towards martial law. Good to s...It is indeed a step towards martial law. Good to see at least some of Zigster's wisdom sank into you .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-25487877313709726852018-08-05T12:27:50.629+01:002018-08-05T12:27:50.629+01:00In regard to Mark Williams-Thomas I used to respec...In regard to Mark Williams-Thomas I used to respect the guy until it dawned on me that he only really cares about scraping a living through his TV career. He's an opportunist and familes looking for hope will hang on his every word. I just hope for their sake he does not bring them false hope and endure their pain. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-19491603147768642392018-08-04T20:13:09.020+01:002018-08-04T20:13:09.020+01:00Hi jc August 2018 at 03:17
As far as the Portugue...Hi jc August 2018 at 03:17<br /><br />As far as the Portuguese detective work is concerned, the case was actually resolved by Portuguese PJ more than a decade ago,as you say, but unfortunately, the legal part of the case has not yet been fully completed. <br /><br />The reason as to why the PJ have been so reluctant to address the real case ( that is the suspicion about the McCanns’ involvement), and chosen to subordinate themselves to British authorities, remains a mystery, but it explains why so little progress have been made.<br /><br />It’s quite reasonable to assume that the on-going investigation, though it is said to be a police cooperation between two police forces on equal terms, has been in the hands of the S Y since the Operation Grange was set up, while the Portuguese PJ have all the time acted as their little helper. That’s how it must have been, as far as I can see.<br /><br />If the Operation Grange after more than 5 years of hard work, whether they’ve been investigating the McCanns or just randomly or systematically have been looking for potential suspects otherwise and elsewhere, haven’t found anything that supports the McCanns’ claims about a stranger abduction, such a “failure” in itself, if this would be the case, does in fact constitute additional circumstantial evidence , which even clearer than 11 years ago suggest that anything but an abduction must have happened. I’m therefore so excited to hear about what the OG havn’t found, as that might eventually help the PJ to solve the case<br /><br /> <br /><br />Björnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-46081774005309894022018-08-04T18:23:03.708+01:002018-08-04T18:23:03.708+01:00"Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton31 July 2018 at ..."Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton31 July 2018 at 08:32<br /><br />Good point Bjorn! If we are surrounded by paedophiles, what's to say we are not also surrounded by thieves and murderers."<br />------------------------------------------<br /><br />Where do you think they live Ros - on some island somewhere and they get a ferry to do their deeds? They live in the community.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-90409304419700957472018-08-03T23:34:09.918+01:002018-08-03T23:34:09.918+01:00Many thanks JC, we need reminding of the Interim r...Many thanks JC, we need reminding of the Interim report every now and then, so see the investigation of this case went so drastically wrong. Who persuaded the Portuguese to remove Goncalo Amaral from the case? Just as he was arranging for members of the Smith family to return to Portugal to make statements.Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-88835631383968920232018-08-03T23:22:14.077+01:002018-08-03T23:22:14.077+01:00He is a dark horse that Mark Williams-Thomas, he h...He is a dark horse that Mark Williams-Thomas, he has the desperate look of a Dickensian villain who has found a way to profit from the suffering of others.<br /><br />I tend to think his reputation as a criminologist springs from his own ability to market himself. His take on the Madeleine case is among the more bizarre. Madeleine he believes wandered out of the apartment and was taken by a opportunist predator. His explanation didn't go down well with the McCanns who were still pushing the open window and the fact that Madeleine was too small to have opened it or made her way out of the patio doors and the gates on the stairs. Why MWT threw his weird theory into the mix, is anyone's guess.Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-16697294563719318042018-08-03T23:13:34.041+01:002018-08-03T23:13:34.041+01:00It is a matter of principle. That I share personal...It is a matter of principle. That I share personal details in a book or online, is my prerogative. I don't share my medical records or my bank statements, yet all these details will be shared with hundreds, if not thousands of civil servants and jobsworths.<br /><br />Again, I suggest you look at the way ID cards have been used in the past. It is the first step towards martial law.Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-59417727239908574592018-08-03T21:03:50.300+01:002018-08-03T21:03:50.300+01:00I find it very strange that someone who objects to...I find it very strange that someone who objects to ID cards is willing to publish every detail of their personal life in a book and online.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com