tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post7056222208933260594..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: WHEN THE GOOD COP WINSRosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger159125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-90681299702813101322017-02-08T05:53:43.323+00:002017-02-08T05:53:43.323+00:00Translations will be added in the coming days.
h...Translations will be added in the coming days. <br /><br />https://pjga.blogspot.nl/2017/02/apelacao_7.html<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-39638077187200978962017-02-08T00:00:08.523+00:002017-02-08T00:00:08.523+00:00Hi Bjorn, lol.
Kate certainly has a lot of front,...Hi Bjorn, lol.<br /><br />Kate certainly has a lot of front, possibly more than Gerry, she seems to have done more solo engagements. I have no idea how she keeps the lie going, perhaps she has actually convinced herself!<br /><br />But more of this to follow, I'm going to be commenting on another Mail article this week, from Tracy Kandohla.Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-15177125208549933572017-02-07T23:09:05.557+00:002017-02-07T23:09:05.557+00:00Thanks a lot Anonymous 7 February 19:42. Exactly w...Thanks a lot Anonymous 7 February 19:42. Exactly what searched yesterday but couldn't find.Björnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-15852029377189609882017-02-07T22:58:48.776+00:002017-02-07T22:58:48.776+00:00Ziggy Sawdust @18:42
We are in accord.
Peace.Ziggy Sawdust @18:42<br /><br />We are in accord.<br /><br />Peace.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-7294120100272582542017-02-07T22:52:28.463+00:002017-02-07T22:52:28.463+00:00Hi Rosalinda and others.
A little bit off topic, b...Hi Rosalinda and others.<br />A little bit off topic, but I just felt that I had to comment on an article in MailOnline/1 February 2017/<br /><br />I’ve always appreciated the English sense of humour, so I was very amused, as I read the joke about Kate McCann being a possible front singer in a choir formed by families, who have lost their loved ones, and that we can expect to hear and see Kate in Britain Got Talent later on.<br /><br />Had the journalist in question (Sam Tonkin), instead tried to make us believe, that O J Simpson, Charles Manson or Phil Spector were to be chorus masters or front singers in that choir, it hadn’t been quite so clever irony, as one of them is a talented actor and the other two are supposed to sing now and then, while Kate neither can act nor can she sing, as far as I know.<br /><br /> <br /><br /><br />Björnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-13901610395675765092017-02-07T21:48:21.202+00:002017-02-07T21:48:21.202+00:00Bennett's banging on again about the photos an...Bennett's banging on again about the photos and is stating his mate and his beliefs as fact when they are, in actuality, guessing.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-8049642607223066842017-02-07T19:42:40.069+00:002017-02-07T19:42:40.069+00:00The Decision From The Appellate Court of Lisbon
h...The Decision From The Appellate Court of Lisbon<br /><br />http://pjga.blogspot.pt/2016/04/full-translation-decision-from.html<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-10017354492800261642017-02-07T19:37:50.906+00:002017-02-07T19:37:50.906+00:00@17:19
“I believe the McCanns were not ultimately...@17:19<br /><br />“I believe the McCanns were not ultimately responsible for Madeleine's disappearance, but that the scheme was put to them on behalf of the same state-sponsored consortium that has been pulling their strings ever since.”<br /><br />My thoughts exactly. Thanks for translating.<br /><br />NL<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-47275885630042303502017-02-07T18:42:27.817+00:002017-02-07T18:42:27.817+00:00@17:19
That's a pretty complex explanation bu...@17:19<br /><br />That's a pretty complex explanation but worth the hard work in my opinion. Wear your tin hat with pride, it's part of the uniform of the anti-baaaaa movement. I know i do.<br /><br />It's hard to comment on the ''everyone's acting' quote as it reads as though it's been pulled from a much broader conversation. A guitar tutor would make a meal of it but I suspect 'acting' is mean't as in 'why isn't anybody acting for us' or 'it's about time somebody acted'. In other words - action. Part of the crisis actor's remit is to never say you're an actor :)<br /><br />Tony Blair and 'dubya' are swimming in blood.They're also swimming in money. War is big business. But scruples are worth nothing when the wine bill arrives at dinner. David Kelly had scruples ( God rest him).He was collateral damage . Official narrative ? Something along the lines of cutting his own wrists with a gun and hanging himself with a knife and choking on exhaust fumes. I admit, I'm paraphrasing, but i doubt you'll find the word by word official narrative or post mortem much more believable.<br /> <br />Since 2007 a lot has come out about politicians in NI and their own particular penchant for small children ( Kincora etc) and blackmail.It was quite a headline when St Anthony Blair turned up there, pen in hand, and all the IRA and UK troubles were erased by ink.<br /><br />I agree about Big Brother's Little Brother and the monkey see monkey do UK. I remember when the towers fell, over 600 Brits were arrested randomly across the country for being Muslims. Obviously, they were all released without charge. But the MSM loved it.The power of nightmares .George W sent a biscuit to Blair for that one. <br /><br />As readers of false flags will know, there always seems to be 'a drill' going on at the same time close by or just prior to the event.7/7 interrupted a 'mock' hypothetical terror attack exactly where the real one occurred.Rudy Giuliani just happened to be in London that day.Nobody had heard of him in the UK until 9/11. I wonder if he was staying at the same hotel as the visiting Israeli PM that day.Deja Vu again...<br /><br />I've entertained a similar idea Re McCanns being drawn in by darker forces.Or that said forces did what they did and it was made known to the McCanns,but something, or someone, has put them in an untenable position. It's the only rational theory that would explain how it became a national incident.Or, in modern political parlance ' a national security' issue. So many little demons behind so many closed doors in our great and proud democracy assures we won't be allowed to know.<br /><br />@17:37<br />The pact of silence is the Tapas 9 get-out clause. A sort of say nothing and you can't hang yourself belief.The internet hasn't done much to loosen their lips though to be fair. The government are under a permanent pact of silence when it comes to matters of truth and transparency.It's their democratic right. Bastards.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-79086975593309639642017-02-07T18:22:37.866+00:002017-02-07T18:22:37.866+00:00sorry...corroborated NOT collaborated.sorry...corroborated NOT collaborated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-91922496320097528682017-02-07T17:44:17.165+00:002017-02-07T17:44:17.165+00:00I read that to Ros, mind boggling wasnt it!! and t...I read that to Ros, mind boggling wasnt it!! and they are letting comments through!!!<br />A fanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-52155738924336355992017-02-07T17:37:31.281+00:002017-02-07T17:37:31.281+00:00well, like 9/11 and 7/7 which were designed to ind...well, like 9/11 and 7/7 which were designed to induce terror in us..the MBM case as Ros has been telling us for a long time was also used to induce a kind of terror in us, ie..lurking paedos everywhere and children snatchers. Over the last 10 years it seems to me that when a child gets left alone by some numpty parent in the Uk or a foreign land, there is an inevitable link back to the Mccanns and we all know and remember that, which then stirs up emotional memories.It sounds wacky to me even as i type it, but i find it hard to shake of the feeling that maybe the whole MBM event has been staged, with a wider agenda in mind. <br /><br />I have 1 question..<br /><br />How come, in 10 years, I cant think of one friend of the tapas 9 who has had anything to say about this whole mystery (even anonymously) online or to the MSM . It seems like nobody knows any of them, not a word from a best friend to say what great people they are and that we can believe everything they say. No extended family,neighbours or workmates or colleagues or old school friends of ANY of them with a single character reference. It seems as if they materialised for this 1 holiday and then poooof gone! Surely as one of the most famous missing person cases in history, we should know a whole lot more about the players after 10 years. I think D paynes "pact of silence" spreads a bit wider than just the tapas 9.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-49083902538212395252017-02-07T17:19:55.458+00:002017-02-07T17:19:55.458+00:00Anonymous @14:00
GM made this remark as part of a...Anonymous @14:00<br /><br />GM made this remark as part of a lengthier statement to ITV on 25th May, 2007:<br /><br />"everyone is acting, some in big ways"<br /><br />Speaking personally I would not dispute that claim for a moment.<br /><br />If it's the more general theme above you wish me to elaborate, then please be patient while I don my tinfoil hat.<br /><br />The entente between 'W' and 'President Tone' established their corporate ethos, namely the 'war on terror', under which rallying cry they could (and did) instigate all manner of restrictions upon civil liberties.<br /><br />I make no apology for taking the view that 7/7 was the London version of 9/11. The British have a typically quaint way of emulating 'big brother' overseas - not quite so grandiose, but with the same general purpose in view.<br /><br />If you really want to frighten the home fans, stage a demonstration on their pitch. (It's not beyond the realm of possibility IMO that the same team of mercenaries came with a transatlantic recommendation).<br /><br />2007 and the 'war on terror' had still to be won. Having declared such a war however, it will have been obvious that the number of 'fronts' was potentially limitless. Any disaffected minority that could knit a 'balaclava' or two and fire a weapon could suddenly appear as the enemy.<br /><br />Of course the UK security services had one of those long before the spectre of middle-eastern martyrs ever arose. And I suspect that to be the context in which the unexpected disruption occasioned by Madeleine McCann's 'accident' played out.<br /><br />As extreme an idea as it may appear to some, I believe the McCanns were not ultimately responsible for Madeleine's disappearance, but that the scheme was put to them on behalf of the same state-sponsored consortium that has been pulling their strings ever since.<br /><br />Jim Gamble (Head of CEOP and formerly involved in NI security) was interested in identifying an Irish person, most probably male, as having been in the Algarve during late April, early May 2007.<br /><br />Exactly who that was we may never know, but such reconnaissance requires international co-operation, especially when it is part of a joint initiative to up-end terrorist activity (you may want your ball back, but you'll usually need the neighbour's permission to fetch it from his garden).<br /><br />As Kate McCann helpfully explains in her chapter 23, those are precisely the circumstances in which the away team CAN stage a pitch invasion without first appealing to the referee. Hence the new BEF, in the form of diplomats, ACPO, CEOP, Leicestershire Constabulary, Control Risks Group etc., etc.<br /><br />Keeping the spotlight on the McCanns throughout has made it all the more difficult to see what has been going on in the wings, but I find it impossible to imagine a pair of mediocre medics from Middle England suddenly being in a position to appoint Extradition lawyers from afar, disband the FSS, direct the Gold Group, and summon the FCO to meetings when it suited them.<br /><br />The McCann case is unique. Since none of the family are, including Madeleine, there has to be an explanation for it all which does not centre upon them.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-16970213596295850122017-02-07T17:09:50.219+00:002017-02-07T17:09:50.219+00:00Yes I saw that video too Ziggy with the russian, I...Yes I saw that video too Ziggy with the russian, If i recall correctly his theor was a nuclear bomb underneath the towers, and quite a compelling argument he made!! Though whether it would have turned the towers to dust (as is what happened) im not sure (and I also have seen every video on this subject too). The most compelling argument seems to be very powerful planted explosives throughout as shown up by the "squibs" in every video, and in my opinion collaborated by the more orthodox demolition of building 7.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-29039475896793163732017-02-07T16:09:30.152+00:002017-02-07T16:09:30.152+00:00Hi T, I actually read a Mail article this morning ...Hi T, I actually read a Mail article this morning wherein Gerry and Kate and spelling it out [to Goncalo] that they have Carter Ruck on standby. Bizarrely, the article also states that they retain Carter Ruck through use of the Fund! <br /><br />Actually, I think I'm going to turn this one into a blog, the heckles are up!<br /><br /><br />For ears they have stressed that the Fund is for the Search for Madeleine and when questions were asked about the use of the Fund, their spokesperson at the time, Esther McVie, stated categorically that the Fund would not be used for legal fees. <br /><br />The message in today's Mail is unequivocal. They are using Madeleine's Fund to sue anyone who challenges the abduction story. This will not bode well for any future cash appeals. Even billionaires shy away from vexatious litigants. <br /><br />Will the McCanns sue the Mail for saying they are using the Fund to pay Carter Ruck? I haven't read the objections of the registered Company recently (they change frequently), but hard to believe keeping the UK's most expensive lawyers on a retainer is among them. <br /><br />The Daily Mail have seriously damaged any future fund raising the McCanns may have in mind. Will they object or do they just not care anymore? <br /><br />I think it very unlikely that the McCanns already have 30 bids on the table. Clarence Mitchell was pitching the 10 year exclusive last year. In a literal sense an 'exclusive' should be just that, all the ins and outs that the other newspapers and magazines don't have. Of course it is easy to play fast and loose with the word exclusive, eg. Kim Kardashian, 'I was robbed', 'How I felt about being robbed', 'How I miss my diamonds', same story, 3 different 'exclusives'. That however is Miss Kardashian, the same does not apply to a 10 year old human interest story, that is merely an update of years 1 through 9. <br /><br />Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83492022891090265832017-02-07T14:55:18.102+00:002017-02-07T14:55:18.102+00:00Ziggy Sawdust @13:32
Thank you. That's cleare...Ziggy Sawdust @13:32<br /><br />Thank you. That's cleared a few things up!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-34627006919487778612017-02-07T14:46:17.221+00:002017-02-07T14:46:17.221+00:00Anonymous @12:08
"You cannot claim you weren...Anonymous @12:08<br /><br />"You cannot claim you weren’t in a position to know, only that you really didn’t".<br /><br />Ah but I did. I was being ironic.<br /><br />You may think my spontaneous definition of fraud inadequate, but the dictionary interpretation doesn't appear to add much, if anything, of consequence. Fraud is of course criminal. It goes without saying (so I didn't).<br /><br />"What appears to be the case therefore is that very many, if not all, can properly claim that they have been wrongfully deceived and likely defrauded."<br /><br />That is most certainly true. Furthermore, quite apart from inappropriate, if not entirely illegal distribution of Fund income, should a solid case be made for the McCanns' having knowledge of their daughter's fate from the outset, they would surely be open to civil charges of fraud, on account of their soliciting donations for an altogether pointless search (e.g., the 'appeal' bucket pictured at the Ocean Club).<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-73285712650601015982017-02-07T14:09:08.138+00:002017-02-07T14:09:08.138+00:00ZiggySawdust 6 February 2017 at 23:08
“The way ba...ZiggySawdust 6 February 2017 at 23:08<br /><br />“The way back machine isn't reliable…”<br /><br />The Wayback Machine isn’t reliable because…??<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-33312807473603559252017-02-07T14:00:32.853+00:002017-02-07T14:00:32.853+00:00Anonymous 6 February 2017 at 17:58
“Anonymous @17...Anonymous 6 February 2017 at 17:58<br /><br />“Anonymous @17:24<br /><br />It's wrong to 'cherry pick' I know, but...<br /><br />"9/11,7/7 London bombings, police investigations that go nowhere, a wider agenda (war on terror) high level cover ups - all of these stories have...had the label Conspiracy Theory attached to them."<br /><br />You just might be on to something.”<br /><br />Anonymous 6 February 2017 at 22:20<br /><br />“@18:35<br /><br />Well Gerry did say, "Everyone's acting"”<br /><br />You are on to something. Please continue.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-86737958877942844652017-02-07T13:39:05.455+00:002017-02-07T13:39:05.455+00:00Anonymous 6 February 2017 at 23:41
Concur.
T
Anonymous 6 February 2017 at 23:41<br /><br />Concur.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-77120975384583997362017-02-07T13:32:20.751+00:002017-02-07T13:32:20.751+00:00@ 11:03
''The 'machine' is a actu...@ 11:03<br /> ''The 'machine' is a actually a building full of computers. It cannot be 'edited' as you put it, although the data it handles can be.''<br /><br />I concede that my knowledge of a lot of things 'IT' is pretty limited. I've read and tried to understand things and my success in understanding it is not much better. What i was driving at, was that some alleged 'archived records' -or web entries' are open to tampering should it be in the interest of certain people. I believe the global paranoia ( terror) that's been forced onto our consciousness has been the official line in justifying the powers that be to unleash their web -crawling spiders 24/7 ( national security , apparently).Plus, of course, the thousands of hackers employed in a poacher -turned-gamekeeper capacity for said powers. I mention this as it fits within the context of the suggested false flag scenario mentioned in recent posts. It isn't all Governmental, that's merely where the buck stops. The UK have MI 5 and MI 6. The US have the FBI and CIA. They carry out the orders .The Sandy Hook and 'Batman' shootings were clumsy.The best argument offered in defence of the official narratives is for a variety of shills or those in denial to call doubters( and critical thinkers) the old 'your tin hats showing lmao lololol ' and such . Sandy Hook was the one with pages on Facebook set up ahead of the event. That was the tip of a huge iceberg of bullshit. The page was 'disappeared' after first being edited. That wasn't ( to the best of my knowledge anyway) down to the way back machine, but it's my contention that 'damaging' information can be edited. I couldn't swear that any hacking took place Re CEOP files. All I'm suggesting is that with so many people in dangerously high positions of power involved in the McCann case, there is far more to it than just a murder or kidnapping.As such, I doubt very much that our intelligence service would have let anything through the net while Madeleine was still around and enjoying her holiday. It's way too amateur.<br /><br />As for 9/11. I think i must have seen a million videos and read a million documents. It certainly feels like it.It was only recently that i finally found the video interview that, for my money, is the absolute definitive explanation of how the towers really came down.It's a long interview and involves a whiteboard and a lot of talk about Physics( another area that i won't make any claims of expertise in). There's mention of the planes and Building 7 are looked into in depth. The man with the information is Russian. he's vanished now, as did his Wikipedia page about it.<br /><br />What I'm implying about the UK and US intelligence service isn't subtle. The FBI are highly intelligent, slick, highly trained, handsome( and beautiful too since women got to play a role) and never lose. But when you finish watching that movie or TV series, the real ones are shockingly clumsy and ham-fisted. They've been caught arming people then later arresting them as terrorists wanting to blow up 'the fed', they messed up Watergate, JFK, 9/11. They're dangerous. The UK have been far more accomplished in covert ops. Maybe it's because of our longer history and involvement in wars ( by wars i mean when two countries attack each other, not one attacks and one fights back in their own land).The UK are proud of their underhanded spies. We practically invented it. The US often confuse reality and the silver screen.ZiggySawdustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-3218326750263364812017-02-07T13:15:29.854+00:002017-02-07T13:15:29.854+00:00Anonymous 6 February 2017 at 18:32
Thank you for ...Anonymous 6 February 2017 at 18:32<br /><br />Thank you for the info and the question. I‘ve been ignorant of the claim.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-73596754225173592472017-02-07T13:06:05.446+00:002017-02-07T13:06:05.446+00:00ZiggySawdust 6 February 2017 at 18:22
“Rock Hudso...ZiggySawdust 6 February 2017 at 18:22<br /><br />“Rock Hudson-gay ? The world's gone mad.”<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_Hudson#Personal_life<br /><br />Has the world gone mad?<br /><br />:)<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-89720007477150319652017-02-07T12:50:08.696+00:002017-02-07T12:50:08.696+00:00Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton 6 February 2017 at 01...Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton 6 February 2017 at 01:06<br /><br />LOL<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-19707252803041608952017-02-07T12:44:10.834+00:002017-02-07T12:44:10.834+00:00Anonymous 7 February 2017 at 11:03
Thank you for ... Anonymous 7 February 2017 at 11:03<br /><br />Thank you for your post. I was about to post my somewhat similar thoughts.<br /><br />“I'm sorry but your meaning is not entirely clear.”<br /><br />Ziggy’s meaning is entirely unclear and I’m not sorry: they might be residing in bliss.<br /><br />:)<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com