tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post9050718392852688248..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: Rosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger53125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-60181765538503939692019-10-31T19:22:34.394+00:002019-10-31T19:22:34.394+00:00T, on Textusa blog:
Anonymous31 Oct 2019, 16:28:0...T, on Textusa blog:<br /><br />Anonymous31 Oct 2019, 16:28:00<br /><br />Please tell me why my following post of 29 October 17:56 has not appeared on the blog:<br />Taxtusa, T has commented @ 29 October 2019 at 11:02 on what you said.<br />http://cristobell.blogspot.com/2019/09/im-delighted-libdems-have-decided-on.html#comment-form<br /><br />Reply<br /><br /> Textusa31 Oct 2019, 18:57:00<br /><br /> Anonymous 31 Oct 2019, 16:28:00,<br /><br /> We believe we published your comment in previous post. We haven’t replied to it and we apologise for it, but as we have mentioned in regards to the Frog/blood/JBLittlemore debate, but life has presented us with priorities that supersede the blog.<br /><br /> We have 3 posts we intend to write and we’re not sure when we will be able to publish.<br /><br /> We think that you mean this:<br /><br /> “Anonymous29 October 2019 at 11:02<br /> Anonymous25 October 2019 at 18:42<br /><br /> Thanks.<br /><br /> Textusa: “Our comment: Disagree. The fact that he [ M Grime T] mentions the possibility…”<br /><br /> What Grime mentions is not a possibility, it is an impossibility. That’s what’s important.<br /><br /> Textusa: “We think T and we agree on what matters: there was no DIFFUSION in that room.”<br /><br /> I don’t know how Textusa arrived at that conclusion, for It is the opposite of what I’d said It’s not a matter of my opinion, it’s physics.<br /><br /> Textusa: “Where Eddie alerted was where the source of the scent was…”<br /><br /> I have no doubt that’s what happened. There must have been a ‘source’ where he alerted. Why the ‘source’ happened to be where it was is another matter.<br /><br /> Textusa: “…we are talking about a strong scent.”<br /><br /> Yes, in the sense that it was strong enough for Eddie to alert. A great dog he was, bless him.<br /><br /> T”<br /><br /> *****<br /><br /> We can but ask if T is saying that this is a physics impossibility?<br /><br /> https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-skX7s46zBgE/XYI1fhBJ_II/AAAAAAAASP0/8rbsJwCnZA44V4OJVy7JzXNvuHxJIKIbACLcBGAsYHQ/s400/blood%2B6%2B081.jpg<br /> https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-iH7zCJOVbe0/XYI2uSikgcI/AAAAAAAASP8/QWNqvkHiR8klBNfE_tKRSz-7n4pIETL2gCLcBGAsYHQ/s400/blood%2B6%2B080.jpg<br /> https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hnJaEnQmKaM/XYI90WY8s5I/AAAAAAAASQE/5rQuIleLOf0BiUmaIoZmC2LOqhpLyXRVQCLcBGAsYHQ/s400/blood%2B6%2B079.jpg<br /> https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-nlSsBTRlL0k/XYI_NbxOdhI/AAAAAAAASQM/rOFDxiTkH4soaSSF0MJVjSAK1r4c5n9pACLcBGAsYHQ/s400/blood%2B6%2B078.jpg<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-57859116517313713812019-10-29T18:45:32.016+00:002019-10-29T18:45:32.016+00:00re @11:02
"...for it is the opposite of what...re @11:02<br /><br />"...for it is the opposite of what I’d said. It’s not a matter of my opinion, it’s physics."<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-58662789735461315042019-10-29T11:10:42.526+00:002019-10-29T11:10:42.526+00:00Comrade
“Poor old Mark grime was only there to se...Comrade<br /><br />“Poor old Mark grime was only there to send in the dogs and let the officers know they were alerting to 'possibles'.Obviously he'd have to submit a written report in later, but there's degrees of expertise in the area.He's a dog handler, not a scientist.”<br /><br />You’ve got your finger right in the centre of my pie. :) Well done!<br /><br />T<br /><br />And thanks for Nabokov<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-30980644975000412032019-10-29T11:02:39.459+00:002019-10-29T11:02:39.459+00:00Anonymous25 October 2019 at 18:42
Thanks.
Textus...Anonymous25 October 2019 at 18:42<br /><br />Thanks.<br /><br />Textusa: “Our comment: Disagree. The fact that he [ M Grime T] mentions the possibility…”<br /><br />What Grime mentions is not a possibility, it is an impossibility. That’s what’s important.<br /><br />Textusa: “We think T and we agree on what matters: there was no DIFFUSION in that room.”<br /><br />I don’t know how Textusa arrived at that conclusion, for It is the opposite of what I’d said It’s not a matter of my opinion, it’s physics.<br /><br />Textusa: “Where Eddie alerted was where the source of the scent was…”<br /><br />I have no doubt that’s what happened. There must have been a ‘source’ where he alerted. Why the ‘source’ happened to be where it was is another matter.<br /><br />Textusa: “…we are talking about a strong scent.”<br /><br />Yes, in the sense that it was strong enough for Eddie to alert. A great dog he was, bless him.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-82249789110527225692019-10-25T18:42:24.315+01:002019-10-25T18:42:24.315+01:00T, from Textusa’s blog
“Textusa25 Oct 2019, ...T, from Textusa’s blog<br /><br /><br /> “Textusa25 Oct 2019, 17:44:00<br /><br /> Anonymous 25 Oct 2019, 17:01:00,<br /><br /> We think you refer to this comment from T on Crostobell’s blog:<br /><br /> “Anonymous15 October 2019 at 16:20<br /><br /><br />“ Textusa25 Oct 2019, 17:46:00<br /><br /> T: [1] Disagreeing with T is not a problem as far as I’m concerned. What concerns me is whether what Martin Grime said in his official capacity stands up to scrutiny.<br /><br /> Our comment: Of course it stands. He has raised a possibility and the fact that the possibility didn’t materialise doesn’t in any way mean that the possibility mentioned wasn’t real and shouldn’t be considered.<br /><br /> *****<br /><br /> T: [2] Agreed. There isn’t, but this is irrelevant to my argument.<br /><br /> Our comment: Disagree. The fact that he mentions the possibility in a first impression and then doesn’t consider it in his report is, in our opinion, a clear indication that he understood that the possibility he raised in a first moment, was not, after consideration, what was really happening in that room.<br /><br /> As we said above, the possibility was real, it just didn’t happen.<br /><br /> *****<br /> T: [3] With respect, putting our thoughts aside for now, I don’t know of any evidence that Martin Grime had been made aware by anyone of such expectations, or that he had, of his own accord, had such expectations prior to Eddie’s alerts in 5A, or thereafter. In any case, what he said about the concentration of smell is wrong, in my opinion. Besides, Martin Grime’s own or received expectations have no significant bearing on whether Not Textusa’s explanation is correct or not.<br /><br /> Our comment: Agree that it was wrong. He said it in a first moment as a possibility. A possibility that did not materialise. However, we think he was correct in mentioning it.<br /><br /> We think T and we agree on what matters: there was no DIFFUSION in that room. Where Eddie alerted was where the source of the scent was, taking into account that we are talking about a strong scent..”<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-45544925581143992932019-10-25T14:52:34.841+01:002019-10-25T14:52:34.841+01:00I came here as directed by you, Comrade T...
T..i...I came here as directed by you, Comrade T...<br /><br />T..if i was partial to the Devil juice, you'd owe me a bottle at least by now...<br /><br />I feel as though i sat down and began to read a book i had been looking forward to reading, then some haze come over me.Not a pleasant 60s one of Purple hue I might add;More one conjured up in the laboratory of one Michael Finn..<br /><br />I was away when this thread ( and most from July onward ) was begun.I was incapable of seeing much, moving much or even breathing much.But, you can't keep a nutcase down.I'm back to my fighting weight and i can see everything.I just feel, on this particular thread, I'm seeing the typed equivalent of a Salvador Dali scattergram.The 'sciencey bits' have done little to rid me of that feeling.<br /><br />Grime said the dogs were there to indicate only didn't he ? I don't think they sniffed a few corners and then put a paper together.As I understand it, they bark / indicate areas of possible further interest to the investigation and then it's down to trained, qualified forensic analysts who have the relevant Phd /Bsc etc to get stuck in and talk about the gasses , the time, the temperatures, the lack of cooling air in a small apartment and so forth.Poor old Mark grime was only there to send in the dogs and let the officers know they were alerting to 'possibles'.Obviously he'd have to submit a written report in later, but there's degrees of expertise in the area.He's a dog handler, not a scientist.<br /><br />As for other parts of the thread.I don't recognise the initials and have heard of Textusa through coming on here.That's about it.<br /><br />"When I try to analyze my own cravings, motives, actions and so forth, I surrender to a sort of retrospective imagination which feeds the analytic faculty with boundless alternatives ''<br /><br />That kinda shiz..<br /><br />ZiggyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83408340022861147412019-10-21T10:09:28.255+01:002019-10-21T10:09:28.255+01:00Of course. The best opponent that ever was.Of course. The best opponent that ever was.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-66956595578208551302019-10-20T11:51:00.699+01:002019-10-20T11:51:00.699+01:00So you miss Ziggy?So you miss Ziggy?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-63878400364609982872019-10-18T11:58:43.144+01:002019-10-18T11:58:43.144+01:00@11:53
Do you always plant your flowers upside do...@11:53<br /><br />Do you always plant your flowers upside down, love? In case you are looking for a date, just let me check my diary if I can squeeze you in. Hmmm… I can spare 2min on 24 Dec at 00:17. Are you game? Formal attire, no recording and/or transmitting devices please. I love your perfume btw. Красная Москва? X<br /><br />Count Bachelorius Baskerville<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-5533237880261420682019-10-17T11:53:09.772+01:002019-10-17T11:53:09.772+01:00T was dissing the dogs and now he is dissing Grime...T was dissing the dogs and now he is dissing Grime.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-30907249336710747242019-10-16T15:15:58.114+01:002019-10-16T15:15:58.114+01:00Te bendigo locamente,
Tristemente mientras me ato ...Te bendigo locamente,<br />Tristemente mientras me ato los zapatos<br />Te amo malamente,<br />Justo a tiempo, a veces, supongo,<br />Por ti necesito descansar, oh si<br />Porque eres tú <br />Quien me pone a prueba<br /><br />Comité de Cygnet<br /><br /><br />Soy una mujer, cariño. ¿No puedes ver lo que soy? Yo vivo y respiro por ti. Pero, ¿de qué me sirve si no te tengo, cariño, si no te tengo?<br />No sabes cómo es, no, no, no sabes cómo es, cariño, amar a alguien como yo te amo.<br />Mi alma y mi dinero que ya lo tienes. Toma tus patines, tus bocadillos favoritos, ven a Cuba y toma lo que queda de mí. ¡Ahora! ¡Si no…!<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkGUt4QYc08&list=RDfkGUt4QYc08&start_radio=1&t=122 at 2:11<br /><br />Te advierto; ni siquiera pienses en decir una palabra de esto a esa voluptuosa Pizzuti. Tsk. Si estoy solo. Querer morir. Ziggmund, Si no estoy muerto, Ya sabes la razón.<br /><br />Comité de Santa María de Cygnet<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-21850453238481701952019-10-16T14:56:00.145+01:002019-10-16T14:56:00.145+01:00Anonymous 15 October 2019 at 18:19
“T, why quotat...Anonymous 15 October 2019 at 18:19<br /><br />“T, why quotation marks “Let the best evidence win!“?”<br /><br />I quoted ‘Phoebe’ as Not Textusa had done having expressed her strong approval of ‘Phoebe’s’ stance.<br /><br />“And how sure are you that you are right?”<br /><br />If J C Maxwell, L Boltzmann, W Pauli and many others are right with regard to the Kinetic Theory of Gases in general and Diffusion of Gases in particular, then Not Textusa is wrong,<br /><br />Speaking of myself, I’m known to have made mistakes, I admit. I try to learn from them as much as I can.<br /><br />Luckily for me, the onus of proof in this case is not on me, but on Not Textusa. I have alleged that she is wrong and given my reasons, and it’s up to her to say she isn’t and provide evidence that her ‘explanation’ is not what I allege it is.<br /><br />I welcome criticism.<br /><br />What are your thoughts, my frienf, if I may ask?<br /><br />“Let the best evidence win”<br />‘Phoebe’ [Helluva cool chick. Must be a goddess. Sure argues like one. :) T]<br /><br />Regards.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-69532394455170863842019-10-15T20:21:12.190+01:002019-10-15T20:21:12.190+01:00@16:20
Penultimate paragraph
Read ‘questions’, n...@16:20<br /><br />Penultimate paragraph<br /><br />Read ‘questions’, not ‘question’<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-42808045419826624442019-10-15T18:19:00.792+01:002019-10-15T18:19:00.792+01:00T, why quotation marks “Let the best evidence win!...T, why quotation marks “Let the best evidence win!“? And how sure are you that you are right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-52357999044659273262019-10-15T16:20:21.221+01:002019-10-15T16:20:21.221+01:00Re Anonymous 13 October 2019 at 01:25
“T,
From T...Re Anonymous 13 October 2019 at 01:25<br /><br />“T,<br /><br />From Textusa’s blog:<br /><br />…<br /><br />[1] “We disagree with T. As we have said in the post, those words were said right after the search and were not a written report.”<br /><br />[2] “…there’s no mention of diffusion by Martin Grime in his written report.”<br /><br />[3] “That’s why we think it was simply a suggestion made at the moment to explain the apparent oddity of the alert being where it was, when it would be expected that if there was to be an alert, it would have been in the bedroom where Maddie was supposed to have slept in and not in the parents’ bedroom.”<br /><br />Could you answer please?”<br /><br /><br />[1] Disagreeing with T is not a problem as far as I’m concerned. What concerns me is whether what Martin Grime said in his official capacity stands up to scrutiny.<br /><br />[2] Agreed. There isn’t, but this is irrelevant to my argument.<br /><br />[3] With respect, putting our thoughts aside for now, I don’t know of any evidence that Martin Grime had been made aware by anyone of such expectations, or that he had, of his own accord, had such expectations prior to Eddie’s alerts in 5A, or thereafter. In any case, what he said about the concentration of smell is wrong, in my opinion. Besides, Martin Grime’s own or received expectations have no significant bearing on whether Not Textusa’s explanation is correct or not.<br /><br />T<br /><br />PS I would provisionally say that a scientist had been relying on a particular Martin Grime’s statement and, ultimately, referred to that statement in her attempt to give credence to her own contention that Brownian motion had effected, in unpredictable parts of the total volume of air in 5A, an increase of concentration of those airborne molecules whose reaching Eddie’s olfactory receptors resulted in Eddie’s alerting.<br /><br />It should suffice to point out three errors. Firstly, Brownian motion is the random movement of macro particles (say, dust) within a domain of randomly moving micro particles (molecules, say, air). Secondly, Martin Grime was wrong to say as he did. And thirdly, it is logically fallacious to insist that a deductive assertion from two false premises is true. <br /><br />It is useful to recall that in a mixture of gases each gas behaves as if it were the only one there. Also, there are good reasons to suppose that what Eddie alerted to is most likely to have been a mixture of several VOCs in a gaseous state (gases).<br /><br />So far only inexcusable abuse has emanated from Not Textusa’s quarters. Knowing her proclivity to deal with uncomfortable question on the spot, one would be ill-advised to hold breath in anticipation of her breaking her silence on this matter any time soon.<br /><br />I would be most grateful for any criticism of my arguments. “Let the best evidence win!”<br /><br />Thank you very much.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-73197147768758609542019-10-14T23:34:40.770+01:002019-10-14T23:34:40.770+01:00Anonymous 13 October 2019 at 01:25
What is your q...Anonymous 13 October 2019 at 01:25<br /><br />What is your question?<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-79053293915745111442019-10-14T16:27:32.020+01:002019-10-14T16:27:32.020+01:00Anonymous 13 October 2019 at 10:20
“T, are you a ...Anonymous 13 October 2019 at 10:20<br /><br />“T, are you a scientist?”<br /><br />Yes. Unfortunately, my PhD theses ‘Admitting mistakes. How to treat those impervious to criticism.’, doctoral advisor comrade Roronoa Zoro, is not in the public domain. :)<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-77584532462121431812019-10-13T18:31:58.588+01:002019-10-13T18:31:58.588+01:00“Timewasting arseholes. Tsk.” said she who’s been ...“Timewasting arseholes. Tsk.” said she who’s been for years moronically infatuated with flogging a dead horse. DO NOT MAKE ME LAUGH, lying timewaster. Tsk.<br /><br />Nurse, take her away.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-14055223355506185922019-10-13T17:39:40.140+01:002019-10-13T17:39:40.140+01:00Anonymous13 October 2019 at 09:51
I wish it was, ...Anonymous13 October 2019 at 09:51<br /><br />I wish it was, but it wasn’t.:( Al<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-31688591648414272112019-10-13T10:20:56.931+01:002019-10-13T10:20:56.931+01:00T, are you a scientist?T, are you a scientist?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-7269771496531438842019-10-13T10:17:40.586+01:002019-10-13T10:17:40.586+01:00Textusa blog
Anonymous10 Oct 2019, 23:03:00
I’m ...Textusa blog<br /><br />Anonymous10 Oct 2019, 23:03:00<br /><br />I’m fascinated by this person T and also Al, who seem to have taken on NT and made him retreat.<br />They haven’t made comments on your blog but have used Christobel as NT won’t publish on his!<br />Textusa11 Oct 2019, 11:09:00<br /><br />Anonymous 10 Oct 2019, 23:03:00,<br /><br />We must confess we are too!<br /><br />Please don't forget Ag who brought his/her questions right into Bridget’s (��������) Normalised Toilet blog and thus earned the right of getting and his (yes, his) trademark reply of “you can s*d off” to pertinent questions! ��������<br /><br />Anonymous12 Oct 2019, 14:53:00<br /><br />T has been on Hutton’s blog for years under different aliases (Winnie-the-Pooh, Winns, Pooh, Poo, Mao. Tze, Chairman Mao, Major Tom, some foreign names, etc). Liked by Hutton, is a friend of ZiggySawdust. Polite, behaves, doesn’t let go.<br /><br />I won’t forget Ag. I hope to hear more from her/him.<br /><br />Anonymous12 Oct 2019, 18:39:00<br /><br />Please tell me what’s wrong with my comment sent today at 11:58 that you’ve withheld it.<br />Textusa12 Oct 2019, 19:49:00<br /><br />This was your comment:<br /><br />Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Blood and the EVR dog - Part 6":<br /><br />I think it would be good to put questions on Hutton’s blog. It seems she wouldn’t mind, she said so.<br /><br />Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 12 Oct 2019, 11:58:00<br /><br />*****<br /><br />The reason we did not publish was simply to not give an excuse to the gang to use the argument that we have now “allied” ourselves to Cristobell.<br /><br />We believe that T, Ag and Al will continue to publish there interesting comments and if we see any that we find useful to the case, we will bring them over to the blog as we have done.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-19976162544031449122019-10-13T09:51:09.582+01:002019-10-13T09:51:09.582+01:00Re Not Textusa11 October 2019 at 19:51
Was it you...Re Not Textusa11 October 2019 at 19:51<br /><br />Was it you again, Al?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-27576333268385012732019-10-13T01:25:20.834+01:002019-10-13T01:25:20.834+01:00T,
From Textusa’s blog:
“Anonymous8 October 2019...T,<br /><br />From Textusa’s blog:<br /><br />“Anonymous8 October 2019 at 09:19<br />@16:59<br /><br />How would you explain the following?<br /><br />Martin Grime:<br /><br />“What we have to be able to understand in a situation such as this is in a hot climate with the apartment being closed down, the scent will build up in a particular area. If there isn't a scent source in here, i.e. a physical article where the scent is emitting from, any scent residue will collect in a particular place due to the air movement of the flat, the apartment and what I would say in this case is that there is enough scent in that area there for him to give me a bark indication but the source may not be in that cupboard, the source may well be in this room somewhere else but the air is actually pushing into that corner.”<br /><br />https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm<br /><br />******<br />Anonymous8 October 2019 at 14:01<br />Anonymous8 October 2019 at 09:19<br /><br />Thank you for your question.<br /><br />My explanation would be that Martin Grime was mistaken.<br /><br />Perhaps what we have to be able to understand when reading the quote you kindly provided is that Martin Grime might not have benefited from any formal education or accreditation in physics in general or in the Kinetic Theory of Gases in particular, and, consequently, he would not, at the time of righting his report, be in a position to make a sound judgement as to the physics of distribution of scent(s) in 5A.<br /><br />Whatever might have been the case, I would hope you wouldn’t mind my saying that the onus of explanation/substantiation of the quoted proposition is on Martin Grime, or on those (scientists included) who rely on it. I’m not one of those.<br /><br />Respectfully<br /><br />T<br /><br />******<br />Anonymous8 October 2019 at 17:45<br />Anonymous8 October 2019 at 09:19<br /><br />What’s there to explain? Grime said what he said.<br /><br />****<br />Anonymous9 October 2019 at 09:28<br />Anonymous 8 October 2019 at 17:45<br /><br />“Grime said what he said.”<br /><br />Indeed.<br /><br />T<br /><br />*****<br /><br />We disagree with T. As we have said in the post, those words were said right after the search and were not a written report.<br /><br />As we have also said in the post, there’s no mention of diffusion by Martin Grime in his written report. That’s why we think it was simply a suggestion made at the moment to explain the apparent oddity of the alert being where it was, when it would be expected that if there was to be an alert, it would have been in the bedroom where Maddie was supposed to have slept in and not in the parents’ bedroom.”<br /><br />Could you answer please?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-64776088221746328022019-10-11T23:27:22.690+01:002019-10-11T23:27:22.690+01:00Anonymous10 October 2019 at 15:14
Behold, the Bri...Anonymous10 October 2019 at 15:14<br /><br />Behold, the Bride comes at night!<br /><br />“Not Textusa10 October 2019 at 23:28<br /><br />Whoever the dickhead was who left a comment relating to another comment left on 29th September, you don't appear to have the faintest idea what you are trying to say - it bears no relationship to that comment whatsoever. Have another try, eh?<br /><br />Not Textusa11 October 2019 at 19:51<br /><br />Dear dickhead,<br /><br />do carry on, it's amusing to watch you digging a deeper hole, seemingly oblivious to the fact that you are standing in one.<br /><br />Timewasting arseholes. Tsk.”<br /><br />Charming. Tsk. Now there are three (four?).<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-35701801471117451802019-10-11T22:32:10.871+01:002019-10-11T22:32:10.871+01:00@10 October 2019 at 18:35
Man findet bald einen S...@10 October 2019 at 18:35<br /><br /><i>Man findet bald einen Stecken, wenn man einen Hund schlagen will</i>.<br /><br />The Hound of the Baskervilles<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com