tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post2903361666339208104..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: STOCKHOLM SYNDROME OR SELF PROTECTION?Rosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger248125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-17488918492664466462018-01-30T09:34:40.150+00:002018-01-30T09:34:40.150+00:00Re my 29 January 2018 at 12:36 post.
Should be “…...Re my 29 January 2018 at 12:36 post.<br /><br />Should be “…a frequently-used figure of speech…”<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-27860290687054453612018-01-30T09:21:18.172+00:002018-01-30T09:21:18.172+00:00Björn
My 25 January 2018 at 11:51 post was in rep...Björn<br /><br />My 25 January 2018 at 11:51 post was in reply to yours of 24 January 2018 at 20:00, not to NL’s of 24 January 2018 at 21:04. I can see that did not confuse you.<br /><br />Sorry and thanks.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-72586153295280056022018-01-29T23:30:47.423+00:002018-01-29T23:30:47.423+00:00I'm not giving you a platform to insult me or ...I'm not giving you a platform to insult me or those I like. Find somewhere else you are not piggy hacking on my blog.Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-29546844154711460302018-01-29T22:46:13.314+00:002018-01-29T22:46:13.314+00:00Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton26 January 2018 at 14:...Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton26 January 2018 at 14:37<br /><br />''And I'm very grateful that you do come on here JB, and that you challenge theories portrayed as facts.''<br /><br />And then presents as many unfounded theories as yourself while you selectively publish replies that criticise your compadre Blacksmith as they deconstruct his nonsense. But then censoring disgusts you doesn't it..( if it exposes your own and his BS)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-63031433104835930222018-01-29T19:49:09.540+00:002018-01-29T19:49:09.540+00:00You have taken the trouble to write in, but your v...You have taken the trouble to write in, but your views are very much in the minority 7:39. John Blacksmith has earned the respect he receives, I feel privileged that he posts here, it is much appreciated by myself and my readers. And no, we are not given to irrational hatred, this case isn't about hating Gerry and Kate, it's about the unexplained disappearance of a child. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-48121703677035836982018-01-29T17:39:49.598+00:002018-01-29T17:39:49.598+00:00john blacksmith26 January 2018 at 00:31
Blacksmit...john blacksmith26 January 2018 at 00:31<br /><br />Blacksmith, It doesn't matter what language you use or who you accuse of being liars or disgusting. Your opinions, and you, only impress those given to irrational hatred.They're easily impressed . They're easily maintained by a simple diet. You all remain on the same page but in the wrong book.Don't let the feedback of fellow narrow thinkers fool you into thinking that you're entitled to the arrogance you parade like a new hat. It doesn't.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-7688831902734884512018-01-29T17:31:01.464+00:002018-01-29T17:31:01.464+00:00''Would you be mocking the dogs findings w...''Would you be mocking the dogs findings waiting for them to mature? I doubt it very much.''<br /><br />It's long been my belief that there are no dog's findings to mock.I believe the police believe the same. Why would that be ? Any suggestions ? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-51575428701269784422018-01-29T17:28:09.048+00:002018-01-29T17:28:09.048+00:00'' Gerry is as enslaved as any hostages he...'' Gerry is as enslaved as any hostages he has taken, they all are.''<br /><br />Questionable grammar aside,how, exactly, is Gerry enslaved. Who has he enslaved and how ? Can we have a little more in the way of facts and a little less of you trying to sound sagacious please .<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-67636410064174812642018-01-29T16:15:48.775+00:002018-01-29T16:15:48.775+00:00Verdi Yesterday at 23:57
"I once knew a bloke...Verdi Yesterday at 23:57<br />"I once knew a bloke, a homosexual, who was having problems with local authorities for harbouring a fourteen year old boy for his entertainment. He had to flee the country before being arrested and imprisoned and/or deported - he went to Thailand!"<br />--------------------------------------<br /><br />Interesting that verdi chooses to use the word homosexual rather than the correct word paedophile. I wonder how many more verdi "knows". Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-90976691661085182702018-01-29T16:12:06.962+00:002018-01-29T16:12:06.962+00:00I wasn't even contemplating the money side of ...I wasn't even contemplating the money side of it.I merely asked if you could prove they were lying.A simple question I thought might be within your intellectual reach.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-7556108681803087662018-01-29T15:10:40.459+00:002018-01-29T15:10:40.459+00:00I shall call you Uriah 13:23, there is something a...I shall call you Uriah 13:23, there is something almost lawyeresque in the way you post questions to me. <br /><br />So my not believing the McCanns, means I'm calling them liars so I owe them money, lol, nice try.<br /><br />Take my words as you wish 13:23, I don't feel inclined to craft a few special ones just for you.Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-45410557611896699372018-01-29T13:49:11.748+00:002018-01-29T13:49:11.748+00:00Anonymous29 January 2018 at 10:56
The problem wit...Anonymous29 January 2018 at 10:56<br /><br />The problem with GA and his theories is that they are trying to cover too many bases. He has Madeleine slipped into the coffin of a lady who was shortly to be cremated. It seems he had read the close relationship ot the priest and the parents later as already existing before Madeleine disappeared.But it didn't exist, he's trying to suggest it to fit his theory.He did that from day one. How does that give his theory of her being buried by the parents and carted around in a car weeks later? Truth of the lie indeed..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-29942003078284370942018-01-29T13:40:02.486+00:002018-01-29T13:40:02.486+00:00Anonymous29 January 2018 at 02:02
''They ...Anonymous29 January 2018 at 02:02<br /><br />''They couldn't give a damn about Madeleine. They were only interested in covering their own backsides.''<br /><br />I believe all involved readily admitted that they had all left their children unprotected so they could relax over dinner and a drink or two for some grown up time.They never tried to hide that.They claimed their 'routine' of taking turns to check on the children was them NOT being negligent.be that as it may, it has to be said that, in anyone's book, it is negligent and a price was paid. They gambled and paid a terrible price.had the children been under a watchful eye from a nanny or in the night creche then no routine would have been needed and they could have had a less fractured evening out and had nothing to worry about.They know that now.But none of that amounts to killing a child or burying one that had died accidentally.I see no way of calling it covering their own backsides by admitting their recklessness.What I do see, is the possibility of them all being in full view in such a small place by day enjoying their holiday with their children, then seen in the evenings going out alone for an hour or two.It wouldn't take satellites and CIA agents to follow the routine for day 1 and 2 to be able to predict what would happen on day 3. All that would be needed then would be a nearby location that offered cover and a car .Timing ? 2 minutes after one of the routine checks. 5 a was at the end of the routine and apartment block and it's steps led to the pavement and road.<br /><br />Sherlock Holmes, Miss Marple, Columbo, Poirot, you can go home. There's nothing to see here..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-12624777890147737942018-01-29T13:23:31.088+00:002018-01-29T13:23:31.088+00:00''Can you sue someone for not believing? I...''Can you sue someone for not believing? If so, what kind of antiquated law is that? '' (Ros)<br /><br />No, you can't. But you can sue somebody for making allegations that they can't provide evidence for.If your allegation is simply one of lying, then that's easy. You prove the lie.can you do that ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-13460382037716583682018-01-29T13:00:58.657+00:002018-01-29T13:00:58.657+00:00Anonymous29 January 2018 at 07:11
''Now u...Anonymous29 January 2018 at 07:11<br /><br />''Now unless you believe the ridiculous burglar story you have to conclude that that implicates the parents''<br /><br />It's possible to believe the parents without believing the burglar theory.Nothing was stolen ; a child was taken.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-58244626664388305292018-01-29T12:58:58.504+00:002018-01-29T12:58:58.504+00:00Anonymous29 January 2018 at 02:17
'' cada...Anonymous29 January 2018 at 02:17<br /><br />'' cadaver and blood dogs were brought in but the death was complicated and other factors had to be looked at which could take years.''<br /><br />I think you'll find that cadaver always smells the same.It doesn't matter how complicated the death was.Death occurs when breathing ceases. It isn't complicated.Blood is blood and DNA is DNA.It would take weeks, not years, to decide if all of that-or even part of it- constituted incriminating evidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83010063894147731302018-01-29T12:54:50.739+00:002018-01-29T12:54:50.739+00:00''The 'pros' have always challenge...''The 'pros' have always challenged the non believers to explain how the body was moved and disposed of, using the fact that no-one can, as a 'gotcha' or a 'it can't be done'. It is almost a taunt.''<br /><br />They challenge the theory full stop, not just the mechanics and questionable logistics that it implies. To make such a sweeping statement and not expect to be asked for evidence is naive to say the least.The whole area of the conspiring group playing out a cloak and dagger operation to hide a crime and burn or bury the evidence is in need of substantial support.None is ever provided.It's a case of basing the case on completely different and unrelated historical cases that have shocked the nation /s in which they occurred by revealing the shock culprit.The Police have shown no sign of cracking anything in eleven years.The longer it goes on the less likely it seems. They should have closed it after 6 months and saved money, time and credibility.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-30911414331625806382018-01-29T12:48:08.666+00:002018-01-29T12:48:08.666+00:00abduction = fund not fraudulent. It wouldn't t...abduction = fund not fraudulent. It wouldn't take years to trace the money's journeys.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-16398738792587758142018-01-29T12:46:25.759+00:002018-01-29T12:46:25.759+00:00The dogs did what they were trained for.So did the...The dogs did what they were trained for.So did the forensics team.Forensics teams don't lie.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-39249323155541230782018-01-29T12:44:52.233+00:002018-01-29T12:44:52.233+00:00actions do indeed..tell Amaral that :)actions do indeed..tell Amaral that :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-30107342042928291812018-01-29T12:42:28.651+00:002018-01-29T12:42:28.651+00:002shay2shayAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-24711038757385263872018-01-29T12:36:32.296+00:002018-01-29T12:36:32.296+00:00Anonymous 26 January 2018 at 12:55
Thank you for ...Anonymous 26 January 2018 at 12:55<br /><br />Thank you for your comment.<br /><br />Letting a stranger in on one’s problems is not everyone’s cup of tea.<br /><br />Payne, on the McCanns’ behalf, told busybody Martin her assistance was not needed (Rosalinda’s “…told her to sod off.” is a frequently used figure of speech). There’s nothing strange about that.<br /><br />T<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-33945230473905609652018-01-29T12:00:31.300+00:002018-01-29T12:00:31.300+00:0011:39 I was a successful secretary, he was a crap...11:39 I was a successful secretary, he was a crap lawyer. Rosalinda Huttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-19404763639199274582018-01-29T11:57:44.977+00:002018-01-29T11:57:44.977+00:00redwood made the comment with relation to the sex ...redwood made the comment with relation to the sex assaults in the area.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-20050642786281203282018-01-29T11:39:12.080+00:002018-01-29T11:39:12.080+00:00Credentials wise, hoe do those of a an ex legal se...Credentials wise, hoe do those of a an ex legal secretary stand up against those of an ex practicing solicitor ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com