tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post2946387734552610227..comments2024-02-04T19:08:45.476+00:00Comments on CRISTOBELL UNDECIDED: REVIEW - NETFLIX MADELEINE DOCUMENTARYRosalinda Huttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01497239700092619580noreply@blogger.comBlogger206125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-37739766217825441462019-03-21T00:29:58.192+00:002019-03-21T00:29:58.192+00:00Who would want to kill a coconut. Animals.Who would want to kill a coconut. Animals.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-77299779066601826012019-03-21T00:26:17.016+00:002019-03-21T00:26:17.016+00:00Who came up with the half hourly check in idea and...Who came up with the half hourly check in idea and did anyone not think it was dangerous.Is it true you and Gerry had had a raging argument resulting in sleeping in separate beds earlier in the week. Would you describe yourself or your relationship as fiery. have you and Gerry ever woke the children up with your arguing here or at home ? have you ever been advised about family or marriage counselling.has anyone ever recommended that you seek respite from any of the children as it was too demanding.How long had Madeleine been crying the night before she went missing. When Madeleine asked why you never came when she called-what did you tell her ? Has Madeleine ever suffered from any kind of sleep disorder ; sleep walking and so on.Is Madeleine inquisitive enough to try venture off alone . ....I think these wold be more relevant to building up a fast picture of the marriage, the family dynamic and Madeleine's behaviour. The '48' were silly...<br /><br />' why did you say she had been abducted' ? ' what were your exact words when you raised the alarm? ' ' who contacted the authorities?' ' did you ask for a priest?' ' what was Madeleine's relationship like with her siblings? ' ' which hospitals have you worked?' ' did you say you had a bad feeling before you left England to come to Portugal?'<br /><br />naaa...amateur<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-42646949192865686582019-03-20T17:05:57.198+00:002019-03-20T17:05:57.198+00:00''I am a bear. All I’m interested in is ho...''I am a bear. All I’m interested in is honey and sex. Who the hell are “the Kray Twins” and why do you speak of fright?<br /><br />Pooh''<br /><br />Winston, you'e an absolute shower.When did honey and sex become different things.Obviously I'm going to have to rethink my menu at my private bordello.It's costing me a fortune these days. Would you like your old room back ? You were my best earner.Nobody could dance for change like you, old fruit..<br /><br />NB<br /><br />Kray twins : Two rather butch looking sisters from London's east end. Sexually confused and rather dim.Mr Bailey made them famous.They were a right pair of odd socks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-88044179826485399582019-03-20T08:45:46.431+00:002019-03-20T08:45:46.431+00:00Oscar Slater 19 March 2019 at 15:38
Oscar ma frie...Oscar Slater 19 March 2019 at 15:38<br /><br />Oscar ma friend, peace be upon you, what are you on about?<br />https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/tete-a-tete<br /><br />I am a bear. All I’m interested in is honey and sex. Who the hell are “the Kray Twins” and why do you speak of fright?<br /><br />Pooh<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-42657473854215164632019-03-19T23:02:26.336+00:002019-03-19T23:02:26.336+00:00No words need to be manipulated. Grime can be trus...No words need to be manipulated. Grime can be trusted. He's an expert.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-35321500756011831532019-03-19T20:51:02.481+00:002019-03-19T20:51:02.481+00:00I bet she'd still nag.I bet she'd still nag.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-73253195277246691442019-03-19T20:48:06.996+00:002019-03-19T20:48:06.996+00:00''Thank you, once again, for allowing me t...''Thank you, once again, for allowing me to repeat that there is a possibility that Maddie's DNA was in the boot of the hire car.<br /><br />You are too generous.''<br /><br />It's my achilles heel. You're welcome, old sport.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-42116446308936927992019-03-19T20:46:10.220+00:002019-03-19T20:46:10.220+00:00Oscar Slater19 March 2019 at 15:37
''Eh, ...Oscar Slater19 March 2019 at 15:37<br /><br />''Eh, 09:32. The dog alerts to the scent it is trained to detect - both dogs alerted, one by barking, the other by pointing''<br /><br />No chance. He was wearing mittens.<br /><br />Why isn't a dog alerting in a prisoner's cell enough to take action ? Because other prisoners had used the cell before ? Wouldn't they question him about the presence of drugs residue ? Maybe it could have been a previous 'tenant' who knows ? Makes you wonder why they'd bother with the dog in the first place...<br /><br />The corroboration isn't a minor point though is it. It's a major point. And the corroboration hasn't happened has it.It would have been easy if what we're told by the antis was true. It would have been equally as easy when collecting DNA samples. The antis talk about the clean up they imagine happened. Was bleach used ? Or something else ? What did Amaral and Co say they used.Whatever it was nobody smelled it and it left traces for the dogs.<br /><br />''Everytime you use these silly semantics all you do is make people focus more and more on what is known.''<br /><br />They're not semantics, they're the facts that have left this case devoid of evidence. Grime wasn't using semantics, he was using science.Let's put it this way..If it was merely a matter of semantics, the prosecution would list the same as you just listed and lay it all out to a jury.He would ask them to consider the bigger picture, including the parents leaving the child vulnerable.Then, where she had been there were traces of blood and death. It would be easy to persuade a jury not to 'bogged down in mere semantics'. What's stopped them ? Or who ?<br /><br />Oscar Slater19 March 2019 at 15:38<br /><br />''A tete a tete, who do you think you are, the Kray Twins?<br /><br />Jeezo, what a fantasist, do you think that frightens me?''<br /><br />Why the swaggering at my friend up there. This is the internet.You seem a little concerned that people are being hard men, hoods and gangsters . It's all fonts. No more. No less . All testosterone exchanges are much more fum in the real world.Online it's so 2004.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-71853044214481467882019-03-19T15:40:17.218+00:002019-03-19T15:40:17.218+00:00Pooh old thing....
Hearsay is admissible in court...Pooh old thing....<br /><br />Hearsay is admissible in court I know. And more often than not it is ripped to shreds by the hounds, this rendering the side it represented as pretty vulnerable to say the least.But i wasn't talking about the hearsay in that context.I was talking about from the point of view that I'm reading somebody online saying that he read someone else saying she had been told something by someone.Hardly a case - closer is it.<br /><br />Jurgen is mad. I talked him out of his crazy quest to jump off another cliff but, alas, i fear he is going to do the wrong thing again.When he is alone he is in bad company. Beware the ides of march jurg..<br /><br />Stanley Matthews ( Sir)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-72566213128912092302019-03-19T15:38:35.006+00:002019-03-19T15:38:35.006+00:00A tete a tete, who do you think you are, the Kray ...A tete a tete, who do you think you are, the Kray Twins?<br /><br />Jeezo, what a fantasist, do you think that frightens me?Oscar Slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15985489413738410279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-26461725421498208082019-03-19T15:37:31.541+00:002019-03-19T15:37:31.541+00:00Eh, 09:32. The dog alerts to the scent it is train...Eh, 09:32. The dog alerts to the scent it is trained to detect - both dogs alerted, one by barking, the other by pointing. There is no doubt that happened. That is conclusive evidence that the dogs did what they were brought to do.<br /><br />Just as a dog alerting to the smell of drugs in a prisoner's cell is not enough evidence to take action, then the dog alerting to the scent of cadaverine or blood is not enough, in itself to convict the McCanns.<br /><br />Corroboration is required: in the case of the prisoner drugs would have to be found in the cell; in the case of the McCanns, some bodily matter, such as DNA or blood, which would prove that Maddie's dead body was in the hire car, is needed.<br /><br />DNA was indeed found, however there are not enough markers to conclusively say it was or wasn't from Madeleine.<br /><br />Everytime you use these silly semantics all you do is make people focus more and more on what is known. Oscar Slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15985489413738410279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-37572380875031492002019-03-19T15:32:06.718+00:002019-03-19T15:32:06.718+00:0020:14 - they haven't been able to exclude the ...20:14 - they haven't been able to exclude the fact it is not Maddie's DNA. It could be Maddie's DNA - advances in DNA testing may give a conclusive answer to whose DNA it is.<br /><br />Thank you, once again, for allowing me to repeat that there is a possibility that Maddie's DNA was in the boot of the hire car.<br /><br />You are too generous.Oscar Slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15985489413738410279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-65559031327209130182019-03-19T15:29:05.906+00:002019-03-19T15:29:05.906+00:00Fair enough 13:10. I suspect the answer to that wi...Fair enough 13:10. I suspect the answer to that will be a long time coming though.Oscar Slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15985489413738410279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-76100782139057546752019-03-19T15:27:55.161+00:002019-03-19T15:27:55.161+00:00The dogs alerted to the smell of death and blood 2...The dogs alerted to the smell of death and blood 22:01. That's all that people need to know.<br /><br />I suspect the transcript will be your way of manipulating the word "evidence" to suggest that there was nothing found, and that there is no suspicion as a result.Oscar Slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15985489413738410279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-79797258539477234742019-03-19T15:25:31.625+00:002019-03-19T15:25:31.625+00:00All it says is that Amaral said it is when the &qu...All it says is that Amaral said it is when the "political will" of the two countries allow it. You'd be better asking him what he meant than fitting in your own interpretations.Oscar Slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15985489413738410279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-53584827191974350362019-03-19T15:22:33.300+00:002019-03-19T15:22:33.300+00:00I can't explain that 13:27, as I know nothing ...I can't explain that 13:27, as I know nothing about it. Tell me more.<br /><br />13:35 "I don't do as I'm told" - what a rebel! Do you smoke and chew gum as well?Oscar Slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15985489413738410279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83048445685401108192019-03-19T15:20:05.623+00:002019-03-19T15:20:05.623+00:0014:52 Is it possible that two years of detective w...14:52 Is it possible that two years of detective work could have them back in the frame?Oscar Slaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15985489413738410279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-65573413695286284112019-03-19T13:11:53.421+00:002019-03-19T13:11:53.421+00:00Sir Winston.....
I was pointing out that all of t...Sir Winston.....<br /><br />I was pointing out that all of the so -called evidence / proof etc that is being discussed would have been pivotal to this case ever leaving the ground or not.As it is, it is still seriously grounded.Some more cynical observers might even say it never even got out of the hangar. Not my good self obviously. I could't be carried far by sheer speculation and guesswork . A bit like the case really. I was just trying to be helpful-being the good souls I am - by pointing out that it's rather silly- some might say stupid- repeating the same incorrect information and trying to sell it as truth to satisfy your own agenda or something worse. The truth that can actually wear the label of truth is that the dogs alerts ( etc) have failed to pass muster in terms of ever becoming 'exhibit A'. That was the decision of a certain Mr Grime.He's had years of practice apparently.Unfortunately this ruins the wishes and dreams of those obsessively hoping to see the McCanns suffer. The innocent until proven guilty may well be statement of our civil and human rights, but the same antis disagree with that. The need for proof and evidence to convict is also not necessary, according to the same angry folk.While the point to the importance of forensic study, they are happy to use a poor quality video from youtube as their 'case' for the prosecution. Pointing the flaws of this and the flaws in their insistence of championing the strength of evidence that is too weak to be considered such by the police is tiresome.Their responses are the same and pretty insulting on more than one level. How's the wisdom go again ..insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Unfortunately another, more subtle ,symptom closes the eyes and ears of the sufferer.Hence we have a an accelerating cycle perpetuated by a stalemate. It's the dance of the tormented.<br /><br />Today's lesson as been brought to you almost by the letter cee...<br /><br />The Rt Honourable Zigrich, The Viscount of Portmeirion<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-1689688554652056642019-03-19T09:46:23.584+00:002019-03-19T09:46:23.584+00:00Anonymous 18 March 2019 at 21:39
Morning
With re...Anonymous 18 March 2019 at 21:39<br /><br />Morning<br /><br />With respect, my friend, you’ve got the wrong ends of too many sticks. It seems you’ve either got your info second-hand or you’ve read the files without paying attention to what they actually say.<br /><br />No hard feelings.<br /><br />Pooh<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-83893364088286316812019-03-19T09:41:27.175+00:002019-03-19T09:41:27.175+00:00Anonymous 18 March 2019 at 22:58
“I want to hear ...Anonymous 18 March 2019 at 22:58<br /><br />“I want to hear Smith say he hasn't changed his mind.”<br /><br />You can’t always get what you want, morsel.<br /><br />“Not somebody saying he said it. That's hearsay.”<br /><br />No, it ain’t. It’s evidence admissible in court as I have already explained.<br /><br />“If he's sure he should have come to make a statement saying as much and offered himself as a witness for the prosecution.”<br /><br />Why don’t you tell him that?<br /><br />“Why hasn't he ?”<br /><br />Good question. Perhaps he feels free to do as he like… We can’t allow that, can we? Why don’t you ask him?<br /><br />You are awful, but I’m bursting with affection for you.<br /><br />Pooh<br /><br />I think Jürgen might need a blood transfusion. Are you ready?<br />‘Klopp’ means ‘a bed bug’ in Russian (<i>клоп</i>).<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-76308556008535603592019-03-19T09:32:20.751+00:002019-03-19T09:32:20.751+00:00Anonymous 18 March 2019 at 21:20
“''11:32...Anonymous 18 March 2019 at 21:20<br /><br />“''11:32 there was nothing inconclusive about the dog alerts. ''<br /><br />If that was true there would have been a trial by now. So it must be wrong or a lie.”<br /><br />Our Oscar is in error on several counts, but he seems to be a nice enough fella for me to have a <i>tête-à-tête</i> with later.<br /><br />“If that was true there would have been a trial by now.”<br /><br />Not necessarily. Here, as Your Serenity would perhaps agree, one might be advised to bear in mind the notion which cannot spoken of, cee?<br /><br />Yours humbly<br /><br />Honey Poo<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-82141271682951891752019-03-18T23:01:10.360+00:002019-03-18T23:01:10.360+00:00''Anonymous18 March 2019 at 01:03
@00:05
...''Anonymous18 March 2019 at 01:03<br />@00:05<br /><br />"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus"<br /><br />I see.. You are talking about the McCanns.''<br /><br />You don't see that old sport. It isn't there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-65178379355371969622019-03-18T22:58:43.950+00:002019-03-18T22:58:43.950+00:00Tell Grime where he went wrong. he's an expert...Tell Grime where he went wrong. he's an expert but i have no proof that he watches youtube.<br /><br />I want to hear Smith say he hasn't changed his mind. Not somebody saying he said it. That's hearsay. If he's sure he should have come to make a statement saying as much and offered himself as a witness for the prosecution.Why hasn't he ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-10358091125521285232019-03-18T22:01:46.468+00:002019-03-18T22:01:46.468+00:00can somebody post the link of the Grime transcript...can somebody post the link of the Grime transcript for Oscar.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-834822786084044829.post-12455380044755618292019-03-18T21:39:26.245+00:002019-03-18T21:39:26.245+00:0011.32. Smith did NOT change his mind. That is disi...11.32. Smith did NOT change his mind. That is disinformation.This was re affirmed by Gemma O'Doherty on youtube. Jemmy your eyes and ears open, watch and listen.<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds6yw3f1Bmk&t=905s<br />As to the dogs, again you disinform. The British CSI dogs clearly indicated cadaver odour and blood in apartment 5A and the Mccann hire car. The UK FFS report on the DNA residues concluded that it came from one of 3 people; Kate, Gerry or Maddy McCann. Furthermore, 15 out of 19 markers were from Maddie, 4 were too degraded to conclude from the use of the LCN technique. This is sufficient evidence to support a conviction in the UK and USA, but not Portugal.<br />One can conclude that without a Portugese style reconstruction, nor a body that the dog and DNA findings were insufficient to directly link to the Mcann parents. To paraphrase you; ' the abduction was dismissed years ago'<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com