Wednesday 12 March 2014

FILL YOUR BOOTS JAYELLES

Despite the risks involved (see last post), today is your day Jayelles, when I say your name out loud (though not 3 times, I've seen Candyman and Beetlejuice) and respond to your obsessional stalking.

I'll give you a minute, no doubt you will want to get your breath back after all that writhing on the floor.  Better now?  Hope that will give you a little insight into the twinkle you see in other women's eyes, that twinkle you have never had, and probably never will.  

Where do I begin.  First of all, please do not concern yourself a moment longer about my sanity.  I have reached an age where I don't give a fuck what other people think of me (its quite liberating), happily most people find my eccentricity charming, so I can live with that.  

I can see how my, shall we say brutal honesty, could be seen as a mental health issue, and indeed the number of times I have been asked not to return to places of work would support this.  Unfortunately the knock on effect is that I now seek out lies and stupidity in the wider world.  Lets just say, I have a heightened sense of injustice that goes right back to early childhood.  I cannot bear cruelty towards the vulnerable, it gets my heckles up.  A three year old little girl doesn't just vanish.  

But lets get back to you.  I have a theory that some women, when they reach a certain age, buy an inordinate amount of cats or they find someone to stalk on the internet.  I am guessing you are sitting at your computer with a variety of moggies on your head and a couple creeping out from under your armpits. Am I right?

You keep your own identity carefully hidden whilst ripping into and naming and shaming others.  Do you not see the hypocricy in that?  You claim to be defending a noble cause, yet you do not have enough faith in it to reveal your own name?  

You have been unmasked as a dental receptionist from somewhere, I don't know if you are, and I don't really care, the picture certainly matched your character, as to the passion for collecting and filing information on other people. All those irritating little A-Z cards day in and day out, it takes some kind of devotion to filing to pursue it in your spare time - err, kudos.  I look forward to the Filing Awards (is it like the Baftas?) and your final recognition.

Your passion for the McCanns (personally) Jayelles is (Oops, thats twice) is way over and above that of, shall we say normality for want of a better, or lets call it a baseline, and you fly off the scale.  You would be in the group known as 'superfans', and my advice to Kate and Gerry is 'Be Afraid'.  You were also obsessed with the Jonbenet Ramsey case, though I not sure who the object of your obsession was there, and frankly, I can't be arsed to look it up.

You are not my first stalker Jayllbait (gotcha!) - I once worked with a woman who became more me than me.  It was like Single White Female in the workplace.  Sadly she was a much better me than I was, and she nicked my job!  Ce la vie.  Your reasons for stalking, wow, that would go into several pages, and I have would have to charge you ;)







20 comments:

  1. Jayelles/jayllbait/jayllbird - or whatever her latest incarnation, is a bit of an enigma, but in a dark, worrying way. Who would spend 7 years of their life cataloguing hundreds of thousands of tweets and try to find a way of making them seem twisted? She even has to lie to herself because they're out of context or missing a word etc which makes the occasional one open to misinterpretation, but only if you have an utterly disastrous mindset. Then, collating all the tweets into a wiki, running them to the police/McCann's/whomever will listen is utterly unfathomable to just about everyone, even her own people who probably just humour her to a great extent. Why are complete strangers ie the McCann's, so important to her that she has to waste years of her life defending their honour without a care in the world for what happened to their daughter, and doing all she can to get those who disbelieve the abduction theory into as much trouble as she can? There's something not right with her.

    She won't have any cats btw, only nice people have them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree. Jayelles comes across as controlled and informed. She does not appear to have the dangerous, wild attributes of many of those who doubt the McCanns. I would like someone to show me evidence of Jayelles' supposed 'stalking', 'threats' etc... as such actions don't seem to fit with her online presence.

      Delete
    2. Rosalinda - Once again, this entire rant of yours about Jayelles is wild, out of control speculation on your part. You cannot back any of it up with evidence, so it's irrelevant. You can't prove that Jayelles is a dental receptionist, or that she owns one cat, let alone many. Why not provide a link to the evidence that Jayelles has engaged in obsessional stalking? That is quite a claim and I would like to see the evidence.

      Delete
  2. Rosalinada...

    I read you aka Christobell... and I love you... nuff said. x

    ReplyDelete
  3. they will never go away the stalkers Bell . xx graceland xx

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ignore the vampires, they are once again trying their little best to stop the critical thinkers from thinking.

    This generic Soap Opera script complete with photographic and moving image manipulation didn't start with: " they've taken her."

    Scene one, act one, of the Pop Up Tapas restaurant is not where the drama actually starts.

    The Praia Da Luz plot is the location for the 'it' to happen, even the doctor, sorry I mean the nanny Catriona Baker tells us in her usual articulate manner that the searches that are being carried out are directed by the Director.

    Kate tells us that she became Kate McCann on that holiday, not the usual Kate Healy, but that's not true.

    Whilst living at the Mews house in Queniborough between 2002 to 2006 Kate is registered as Kate Healy, even though she allegedly married the McCann chap in 1998.

    Once the couple and their two children move into the Rothley house in January 2006, Kate quickly becomes Kate McCann.

    On the 28, April 2006, Mr and Mrs McCann (not Healy) apply for planning permission to extend a building at the side of their house, this is the pivotal time when the name clearly changes.

    The end result of the changes being that the two car garage has been altered to make the building into an extra long two car garage, there is no window, just a side door.

    In the 2009 documentary Madeleine was Here during the back garden 'everone is happy playing scene' (video #1 /5 at 01.53) look who's slithering nonchalantly out of that side door!

    When thinking about the complexity, the planning and the icy cold sickness of this hoax following the untimely demise of an innocent child, I remind myself of who we are dealing with... an oozing leaking pile of yellow TOAST! Sorry Kate, you know you could have done better.

    Here's three apposite songs that remind me of all of you, yes all of you, we know how you are all related now, especially the real biological cousin.

    Enjoy the music, Pact people:

    1) What's He Building in There, by Tom Waitts

    2) Working Class Hero, by John Lennon

    3) Little Boxes, by Pete Seeger

    Lastly, I don't beleive the official D.O.B. there is absolutely no evidence to back it up. R.I.P. sweet child x


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Anonymous, your post is causing quite a stir on http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t9349p210-comment-left-on-cristobell-s-blog#238438 and if you have any more messages for the 'Pact People' - do tell!

      Delete
  5. "Once the couple are their two children move into the Rothley house in January 2006"... ? they had 3 children.
    V. difficult to see clearly who's slithering out of the side door...Michael Wright?
    Can you explain what you mean about the real biological cousin and the official DOB? I do dislike riddles.
    Good work Cristobell, your optimism is heartening.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The couple had 3 children in January 2006.

    ReplyDelete
  7. To the person who left the very intriguing riddle. Please can you send another riddle in.

    Thanks in advance.

    ReplyDelete
  8. To Anon at 1628: are you implying that the lengthened garage was to serve as an operating theatre? Or a mortuary? Surely it's impossible to tell who came out of the side door? Too distant, too out of focus, no? Let's guess: 6-letter surname? Begins with S?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Too many "Anons"!! The one who left the riddle popped in here in March, and has since disappeared. So it seems. A wind-up merchant, like Coldwater of old?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Didn't you know the garage extension is for Jerry to continue working on Frankenstein s monster??

    ReplyDelete
  11. All as mad as bloody hatters, the lot of you.
    ' the number of times I have been asked not to return to places of work' is a fascinating admission.
    It confirms my belief that McCann haters are society's rejects.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Rosalinda - You go on about Jayelles refusal to use her real identity, and I do commend you for using your real identity. That is one thing that sets you apart from the majority of other McCann doubters. However, if you are going to criticise Jayelles for remaining anonymous, then surely you ought to apply that to others? You 'appear' to have a lot of support on this blog of yours, but how supportive are these people of you in reality? Even when they support you, they do so anonymously. I don't think that counts for much at all. Unlike you, they are not actually willing to risk anything. Despite the many accolades you've received here, very few of the authors are prepared to risk a single thing for YOU.
    Now, why wouldn't I use my real name? Because I think that many of the McCann doubters are vile, pathological abusers, even if only on a 'verbal' level. The fact that they have not enacted anything dangerous outside of verbal ranting, (so it would seem. There isn't evidence of any violent crime from them...), does not mean that anyone would want to engage with them in person. I have children and would never trust the McCann 'antis' with any knowledge of my ID because of how horrible they can be. Simple.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It might interest you to know that prolific YouTube troll 'Michael Walker' may well be Jon Corner, friend of K&G McCann. 'Walker' never concedes a thing on YT...NOT EVEN BASIC NEGLECT! Question: Is Jon Corner a paid McCann YT troll?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe so, as does another YT in 2015 if you google Michael Walker Mccanns it comes up & how I found this. I've just been watching Richard D Halls videos, the best yet is 'When did Madeleine Die?' & analyses all the evidence, statements & shows if all on screen so not just theories. I don't care who knows who I am Andrew Moreton, not the author who write about Diana, his was Mirton, no E. Anyway Michael Walker is still on YT trolling & started on me tonight, then I saw he'd done the same on other threads to others. So I've called him out on there as Jon Corner, godfather to twins and I think he also has an unhealthy interest in children, like Payne & Gerry (UK police confirmed to Portugal 🇵🇹 police that there's an entry on CATS, a system all government agencies use to log incidents about child abuse but they didn't give any details of what it was. I think her death was probably accidental and they found her dead, then covered up due to status, reputation, other kids etc though there may have been abuse or drugging that's show up at autopsy. Either way they know she's dead, have always referred to her in past tense, all their interviews focus on them & how they feel, not her cos they know she's gone. They use distancing language eg a or the child not my daughter, the focus of the sentence is defending themselves first & what they did in minute detail-guilty people do this to 'prove' they're not lying, Maddy always the afterthought. Watch RDHall's vid with Peter Hyatt statement analyst. They use very & really a lot too & often repeat it eg Gerry says in an Aussie interview 2011-we were really relaxed, really relaxed' Not on the bus in airport you weren't, even saying 'not on holiday to have fucking fun' & looks miserable twat on the 'last' photo on Thursday allegedly- very hot & sunny by pool, yet Sunday was the only day like that, rest of week cloudy & weather charts confirm. Honestly there's mountains of evidence in the first RDHall vid I said When did Maddie die? - 4 hours but proof beyond reasonable doubt. I think Kate shows some signs of DV or abuse & statement analyst said indicating that too-I can believe Gerry is a perpetrator, seen frequent rage on camera. I hope one day she leaves him then I think we'll get the truth.

      Delete
    2. I believe so, as does another YT in 2015 if you google Michael Walker Mccanns it comes up & how I found this. I've just been watching Richard D Halls videos, the best yet is 'When did Madeleine Die?' & analyses all the evidence, statements & shows if all on screen so not just theories. I don't care who knows who I am Andrew Moreton, not the author who write about Diana, his was Mirton, no E. Anyway Michael Walker is still on YT trolling & started on me tonight, then I saw he'd done the same on other threads to others. So I've called him out on there as Jon Corner, godfather to twins and I think he also has an unhealthy interest in children, like Payne & Gerry (UK police confirmed to Portugal 🇵🇹 police that there's an entry on CATS, a system all government agencies use to log incidents about child abuse but they didn't give any details of what it was. I think her death was probably accidental and they found her dead, then covered up due to status, reputation, other kids etc though there may have been abuse or drugging that's show up at autopsy. Either way they know she's dead, have always referred to her in past tense, all their interviews focus on them & how they feel, not her cos they know she's gone. They use distancing language eg a or the child not my daughter, the focus of the sentence is defending themselves first & what they did in minute detail-guilty people do this to 'prove' they're not lying, Maddy always the afterthought. Watch RDHall's vid with Peter Hyatt statement analyst. They use very & really a lot too & often repeat it eg Gerry says in an Aussie interview 2011-we were really relaxed, really relaxed' Not on the bus in airport you weren't, even saying 'not on holiday to have fucking fun' & looks miserable twat on the 'last' photo on Thursday allegedly- very hot & sunny by pool, yet Sunday was the only day like that, rest of week cloudy & weather charts confirm. Honestly there's mountains of evidence in the first RDHall vid I said When did Maddie die? - 4 hours but proof beyond reasonable doubt. I think Kate shows some signs of DV or abuse & statement analyst said indicating that too-I can believe Gerry is a perpetrator, seen frequent rage on camera. I hope one day she leaves him then I think we'll get the truth.

      Delete
    3. I'm also stunned by how many people they have or are during, approx 9, including Tony Bennett (for all assets, & may go to prison)& Snr Amaral, lead investigator (for £1.2 million & had assets seized) as both want to print books based on facts from the police files something the McScamms say they want people to know & Gerry has said he doesn't mind people having theories-just not on them. They also got an American respected profiler I think Pat Brown book banned too but again all based on facts. If nothing to hide, let them print, keep the story alive, answer the 48 questions & take a polygraph to disprove any of the theories about you if they're wrong. Even if it meant going to jail for something else you'd do that at the time to find your daughter whilst your dream team of lawyers & PR people fought on, I would. So unless you have something to hide relating to her death, do it. But let's face it-cadaver dogs found odour in the flat, clothes hire car etc so someone died in that appt, even if the car & clothes were transfer. Even if it wasn't her, 10 years have passed so if abducted she's either dead or thinks she's someone else so she's never coming back either way but Im convinced she died in 5a & parents involved somehow. The worst thing after the fact a little girl died is that they've stolen the spotlight from so many other children that are missing, wasted so much of everyone's time, trust energy not to mention the money. Supports if them say we are nuts but there are hundreds of YT vids with masses of different experts on their fields that all point to her being dead & the parents guilt. I have yet to see one expert discredit or explain why the other experts are wrong, NOT 1! Just Michael Walker aka Jon Cirber trolling, & other people in their camp or people who haven't researched it much since the main streams media daily dose of the parents story as fact throughout summer 2007. So sad. Accidents happen & the public could have accepted that but this charade, & those who help continue it, makes that aspect as bad if not worse than what happened (unless deliberate & I don't wanna go there)

      Delete