'If Ros publishes anymore posts from you saying there was blood spatter up the walls............... I will report Ros to every authority I can to have this blog closed down and for Ros to be taken to Court'.
And there we have it folks, another glimpse of Team McCann's heavy handed threats to silence those who don't believe the abduction story.
Though I have come under many attacks from Team McCann over the years, they have not been able to accuse me of inciting hate, or any other legal violation that would land me in the dock. One, because it is not in my nature, and two, I am a published author who knows exactly how a 'legal reading' works. Three, I'm not attention seeking like Bennett, and Four, I'm not stupid.
The problem the poster on the last blog has, is the mention of blood spatter on the walls. Specifically, the use of the word 'blood', which apparently if referred to as an unknown body fluid, gets the McCanns off the hook. The sane among us, can of course see the snowball in hell analogy - as if playing semantics will delete all those images of yellow post-its on the walls, curtains and sofa we have all seen in the police files. It reminds me of an iconic scene in Dallas, when Sue-Ellen catches JR in bed with another woman. 'Do I believe you or my lying eyes' she yells. Quite.
I am an intelligent, educated woman 'Unknown', not only do I stand by my words, I am proud of them - unlike yourself, who hides behind anonymity to issue bullying threats. My blog is not libellous, nor is it a vendetta against the McCanns - I am the only forum that hosts both sides of the argument.
What are you going to get me in the dock for Unknown? Not censoring posts that give an unfavourable image of the McCanns? Is this still a reputation thing, or have you moved onto arguments for the Defence? It wasn't blood M'lud.
*Seinfeld fans will recognise the soup Nazi, No soup for you!