Monday 9 January 2023

THE HARRY AND MEGHAN SAGA - a subversive view

The Harry/Meghan saga.  I can keep my trap shut no longer!  Meghan is of course a she devil, the cavalier (love that word) discarding of her sick father who doted on her, her entire life, is proof of that.  So too the dumping of her family and friends who didn't fit in with her new 'Princess' life.   She is the epitome of narcissism, she does not have one scintilla of empathy, least of all towards the poor sop who married her.  

Post shit hitting the fan, via the early release of Harry's book in Spain and as the dust begins to settle, commentators are asking, in earnest, whether Harry has anyone close left to advise him.  Someone who cared about him enough to stop him publishing the cringey, toe-curling details that will ensure he has the pee taken out of him for the rest of his life.  No man, especially not a 'vet', calls what they wear around their neck, probably a chain, a necklace.  Naturally, pictures of Harry dressed as the Queen in pearls went up immediately.  And that was just the beginning.   

As someone who has written a memoir, there are crucial things to bear in mind before you begin.  The first, honesty and integrity. Words matter and the written word lasts forever.  Whilst it is an easy way to get revenge, it is more honourable to take the compassionate ground, to question why, in hindsight, did that person act that way.  To step in their shoes for a moment.  And, as my beloved father drummed into me from childhood,  'don't hurt someone just because you can'.  

Memoirs, of the misery variety, which Harry's is, have an expectation of, well, err, misery, which is where I went wrong on the book sales front.  I had found, while digging through the memory banks, that I had a much happier childhood than I realised.  There was no way I was going to portray my wonderfully unique, beloved father and mother as ignorant, feckless or, heaven forbid, cruel.  I even eased up a little on the actually cruel nun and 'uncle' who ran our children's home like a gulag.  They were products of their time, their backgrounds, their own indoctrination.  For me, writing a memoir was a huge learning curve, in a good way, I found out that digging up things that make you feel bad is fecking crazy, digging up things that make you feel good, is a much better route to enlightenment and contentment. 

Revealing your deepest, darkest, secrets in writing, or even in therapy will haunt you forever more.  Save those for drunken sessions with friends who will never use them against you.  Friends who will never say, 'yar, publish that for the whole world to see, especially the tale of the necklace, the frostbitten dick and the 25 Taliban you killed'.  No-one who liked him would ever say that.  Anyone who liked him would have told him that he was handing the media and social media a huge artillery of weapons to use against him.  What a shame he didn't have his family, his friends and all those courtiers around to advise him.  Having had a book published by Random House, I don't know how these awful indiscretions got past his editors and legal readings. But they are paid by Random House, ditto, his agent and indeed himself.  It is the juicy bits that will bump up the sales.  It appears the 'you will be a laughing stock' talk never happened. 

Sadly, I think Meghan had a big, spiteful, hand in the writing of Harry's book.  I know how intense the book writing process is, especially if you have someone else reading and commenting on what you (or your ghostwriter) have written.  Meghan, the eternal English O-level student, would have encouraged him to reveal every tiny graphic, detail he could remember from his upbringing.  Especially, drawing, as much as possible, on his late, lamented mother, there is still much cashing in to do in her name.  

I suspect the hand of Meghan because men don't generally attack other men for their looks with bitchy balding comments, nor do they refer to their neckwear as a necklace.  That's more mean girls than two brothers.  But I can't blame Meghan entirely.  As much fun as Harry was, he always had a chip on his shoulder with regard to the press.  And, now we know, with his position in the family as 'spare'.  His girlfriends also kept dumping him.  From a romantic perspective, the planets were aligned for the meeting of Harry and Meghan, or from a jungle perspective, an alpha lioness spotted a limping gazelle trying to keep up with the herd.   

From all I have read and seen, I'm afraid I do see Meghan as a predator.  She came to England specifically to find status and a rich husband, and with Harry she struck gold.  Money and a title!  Harry's negative traits of self entitlement, and self pity that drove away previous girlfriends (I'm guessing, that and throwing crockery at servants) had the opposite effect on Meghan, not only did she have the same character defects, she admired them!  Nay, cultured and encouraged them.  'Everything that makes you feel really bad about yourself H, just focus on that'.  A bit like his grandaddy going along to Madame Luncheon Voucher for a good thrashing (allegedly).  Sorry about that.  Such salacious gossip  has no place here, added just for the coffee spilling moment.  

From a psychological perspective I don't know if there is any link between emotional battering and 10 physical lashes with a cane at public school.  The 'Madame Luncheon Voucher' affair, where most of the clientele turned out to be ex public schoolboys would suggest there is.  In any event, what Meghan did to Harry is eerily similar to what controlling narcissistic men to their (usually) battered wives.  That is they love bomb them and isolate them until they have absolute power and their victim has no-one to turn to but them.  

Sadly for Harry, the man he has become is a shell of the man he once was.  It's as if all the joy and humanity has been sucked out of him.  He doesn't even know the difference between right and wrong anymore, let alone good taste, bad taste.  He is living in a large mansion in California, not his dream, he wanted to live incognito in Africa. He also wanted what his brother had, a wife like Kate and a big family to meet up with for summer and Christmas holidays, a large country estate, polo chums, shooting weekends, bowing and deference from all around him.  Instead he ended up with his wife's 'Hollywood Wives' dream, of being fabulously wealthy and hanging out with the rich and famous.  The nouveau riche rather than the old families of the landed gentry.  And in California, he is no longer a big fish in a small pond, now he is competing in a ruthless industry, where being a Prince doesn't top talent and hard work. As yet, he and Meghan have exhibited no discernible talent. 

Sadly for Prince Harry, once Meghan had him in her sights, there was no escape for him.  She used every trick from 'the nasty girl's guide to ensnaring a dim witted aristocrat'.  Portraying herself as intelligent (she watched every episode of Jeopardy), a gourmet (she can name popular foreign foods), she is beautiful (she was a suitcase girl on Deal or No Deal), She is a feminist (she hated it). Her biggest hook for Harry however, was her idolatry of his poor departed mother.  A woman with 'powers' brought back the spirit of Diana to assure H&M they were on the right path.  And then Harry takes Meghan out to Diana's grave on the tiny private island on the Althorp Estate, where she laid her hand on Diana's headstone to connect with her.  Dear Lord yes, the big eejit recounts that, frankly creepy visit by the pair of them to his mother's grave. Clearly nothing is sacred, unless you count Meghan who was blessed by the spirit of Diana.  Perhaps they can reignite that spirit with a world tour, once more bringing the spirit of Diana to the masses.  Think ticket sales and merchandise.  

I haven't yet seen Harry's pre book release interviews, they are airing tonight, but it will truly be a struggle to watch them.  Harry is the victim of a narcissist.  He has narcissistic traits himself which probably drew him to her, but of the two, she is the dominant control freak.  She believes she can, through Harry, be invited back into the Windsor hierarchy on her terms.  I'm guessing a castle bigger than his brother's, apartments in London and New York, her pick of the Crown jewels, shedloads of dosch and a fleet of servants.  She is delusional of course, the monarchy have fought off (sometimes physically) the challenges of second sons and foreign she wolves for centuries.  The pair should be grateful they haven't been dragged off to the Tower and drowned in a vat of wine of their own choosing, the fate of one unfortunate second son.  

This won't of course blow over, it will be etched in history forever more, but it will fade away just like the Princess Diana and Paul Burrell books.  If Meghan truly was as intelligent as she thinks she is, she would have known that that the rest of the world and the USA especially are no longer in awe of crowns and titles.  The Duke of Windsor, formerly Edward VIII, did not become the popular global star his wife Wallace may have imagined.  After the initial furore of his abdication, he lived in semi obscurity in Paris.  Sarah Ferguson, who revelled in her Duchess of York title was fortunate to enjoy the tail end of the US's love of British Royalty.  Diana may have toyed with the idea of moving to the US but I suspect Buckingham Palace moved heaven and earth to ensure she stayed in the UK.  For her divorce settlement Diana got £17 million and £400,000 a year while Sarah got £15,000 a year.  A vast difference between the two, explained by Sarah being in the pay of Weightwatchers.  BP probably threw their hands in the air in horror at the thought of the mother of the future heir being in the pay of corporate America.  

Anyway, I will watch the Harry interviews, or at least try to.  I find at my age I am very discerning about how I spend my precious time, my guard is set to zero for negativity and whining.  And should mention, I found the Harry and Meghan docuseries boring. Listening to people telling you how wonderful they are is an absolute turnoff. And here they break that other golden rule of writing.  Do not preach. Readers hate it, they don't want to be told they need to go through the same brainwashing process as the writer in order to be fulfilled.  And if you are going for the 'look at me now' finale, you better be living the dream.  Harry preluded his book announcement with 'not the prince I was born, but the man I have become' as if his journey and transition were a resounding success, when we can see by his pallid, miserable face, that it clearly wasn't.  He doesn't look or act like a man living his dreams.  Hollywood people are not his people.  They don't go out stalking and shooting deer, they don't hold banquets, they don't have Presidents coming to dinner and only on special occasions are red carpets rolled out for them.  All the deference Harry received as a Prince of England.  Now he is a non-working Royal, which sounds almost as insulting as undeserving poor.  

Could you imagine Harry at a cocktail party or a meet and greet, being approached by a non resident Russian Oligarch with a few billion to launder.  'Sorry, can't do it old chap, I'm non-working'.  That's not to say the working side could or should, but that's a whole other nest of hornets.  Sadly, Harry, as a man (common) that he has become, is finding out that his days of hobnobbing with world leaders and billionaires are behind him.  Not only does he probably not get the invites anymore, but no-one admires a man who can betray his own brother.  He ditched his family and his birthright as cruelly as Meghan ditched her father and family.  That's why I don't like them.  If they can be so disloyal and despicable (behind closed doors) to the families who loved them, their public philanthropy and charity is phoney, in my opinion.

So how did Meghan hook Harry.  Meghan follows the philosophy of 'The Secret'*.  That is she has unleashed the power (that we all have) to achieve her goals and desires.  Successful people will tell you to imagine, picture yourself, in the place you want to be and you will get there.  Sounds fanciful, but it works.  I will give an example.  I once coveted a brand new Rover car displayed in our local High Street.  I use the word covet because that was how I felt, I was obsessed with it.  The problem was there was no way I could ever own one, but I did.  I made it happen. Within a couple of years that mental image I had created of myself merrily driving a brand new shiny Rover became reality.  

The 'secret' is not such a great secret.  Most people who use it's powers and techniques are not even aware of it, some might call it ambition.  Once you decide what it is you want, you become hyper vigilant to ways, means and opportunities to get it.  You pick up on them because you have your eye on the goal.  As I say, we all have that power if we choose to use it.  But if we live and breathe that go-getting philosophy we embark on a nerve-racking roller coaster.  How far will we go to achieve our goals?  Are we prepared to be ruthless, to hurt others, at what point do we say, it's not worth it.

Happily most people are happy with a shiny new car or a semi-detached in the suburbs, others want world domination like Putin, Trump and Meghan Markle.  They keep their eye on the goal but they want to punish others along the way.  'Look at me now', is not enough, their enemies must suffer.   See every tyrant and despot throughout history.  

I feel bad now for portraying the philosophy of 'The Secret' as a bad thing.  It isn't.  Most people apply it with morality and reason, they are not aiming for world domination.  To be fair, I am not sure Meghan is either.  Right now she is going for iconic status as a humanitarian/feminist/activist/celebrity, she has given up on the acting.  Dare I say it, she is unfocused.  She is torn between battling for that Princess status, the castles, the jewels etc, continuing with her bland, non controversial, non subversive, podcast opinions on subjects no cares about, or, step over that great big red line and criticise US gun laws, stand up for abortion rights (Roe v. Wade), question the motives of the religious far right.  She and H live in America now, they are the laws they have to live under.   

Meghan describes herself as an activist but she doesn't lend her voice where activism is needed.  She visited the tragic scene of the Uvalde mass shooting, but she did not speak out about the crazy gun laws in the US that allowed this to happen.  That would have given her all the front pages she wanted.  She could have gone on 'The View' and all the late night talk shows.  Why didn't she?  (1)she doesn't know enough to discuss the subject, (2)she still abides by the Royal rule of no politics. I think (2) would result in the immediate loss of her Duchess title.  You can see her conundrum.  

Sadly, I do not think the future bodes well for Harry.  In this Disney movie, it is the Prince locked in the tower and loving it.  'Harold, lower your hair' shouts Prince Willy from below.  'I can't, I haven't got any' then 'no you fiend, let go of my necklace', a sorry saga indeed.  It's like the man in the iron mask, saying 'no, I'm good, leave me here for another 2 decades'.  Harry's mask is his beard, his casual California chic, his weird, woke BLM personality spewing out platitudes that brought to my mind that 1970's 'I'd like to buy the world a coke' ad, where all dress like hippies and link arms.  Now all those hippies wear suits and work for large (and often gun selling) corporations.  Such is life.  When Harry cuts his hair and discards his bellbottoms, there won't be much to go back to.  

I could go on, but I will spare you dear reader, especially if you have made it this far.  My kindest wishes to all.





*https://www.amazon.co.uk/Secret-Rhonda-Byrne/dp/1847370292/ref=asc_df_1847370292/?tag=googshopuk-21&linkCode=df0&hvadid=310805565966&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=10138006440210790575&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9044987&hvtargid=pla-318206917580&psc=1&th=1&psc=1

8 comments:

  1. Rosalinda, this spot on. It’s exactly what I think. I worry for Harry when he realises the book was a mistake and the whole world is laughing at him. Meghan must have approved the finished manuscript. Did she let it go knowing the reaction it would cause?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hiya 'Anon' and thank you replying. The tragedy of losing our parents is the fact that for most of us, they could keep a check on and modify our behaviour until we gained that same wisdom ourselves. Both H and M have ditched their fathers which is a shame because Harry could really have done with a bit of advice from Charles and his brother, they truly care for him.

    And yes, sadly, I think the Meghan claw (I watch a lot of the Body Language Guy) is much in evidence throughout the writing process and the spite I think is deliberate. She may already have moved on to her divorce strategy, keeping recordings and videos a la Amber Heard. They are two very angry people, sharing a madness. A good example of folie a deux.

    ReplyDelete


  3. Happy new ( ish ) year to one and all ( especially the one with the delicious lips xx ).

    I had a feeling you'd tackle the latest exciting cliffhanger that is the ginger whinger and his thing.

    There has been an army of protectors to censor, edit and hide the dirty secrets of the Royals as long as we have had royals. But not so many now. It went with HRH.


    Charles, alleged father of the ginger one and now our King, while conducting his decades long diddling with Camilla, had his phone tapped and the world was treated to the lovely poetic imagery of him desiring to be her tampon ( where were the censors then. i can still remember choking on my weetabix ).They're like the Addams family.

    We all recall the shoddy treatment of Diana of course.She was the victim of the bloodstock obsessives who had chosen the Spencer line to top up and cleanse the tainted Germanic line that keeps throwing up the occasional 'flawed' specimen that has to be hidden away with the crown jewels before he starts to argue with plants or scream at his jodpurs infront of the servants.

    Poor Diana foresaw her own demise and even suggested it would be a car accident following tampering.She said she had seen, on a number of occasions, a woman 'with powers' who was a great comfort to her; a 'psychic' if you will. Unfortunately she missed the all important warning. Diana was too 'human' for royalty. She loved to kiss and cuddle her children and didn't care who knew and saw.The Queen preferred to greet her own children with formal handshakes as they didn't sweat.

    Now we have Ginger saying he sees a woman 'with powers'.A cynical attempt to tap into the global sympathyr for his mother and get potential book -buyers onside.She ( according to the whinger) approves of everything he says and does and gives him her blesssing( that was all over the papers 48 hours prior to the shops opening their doors to sell his book and caused a stampeded- nice work H ). So now he tells of his three courtiers he refers to as 'Bee', 'Wasp' and 'Fly' ( does his Mother on 'the other side' approve of that ?) . His explanation of why he refers to them as these little creatures is as unpleasant and superior as you imagine.Grandad would be proud...

    Like 'unc' Andy, he too has war stories. He brags of 'killing 25'. No remorse.No regret.And no explanation as to why he kept score if he didn't find it enjoyable. Killing one would haunt anyone normal, even in war.Bombing thousands wouldn't hurt ; it's statistical from that point . But to count 1, 2, 3 etc smacks of macho arrogance.It doesnt help that he cites Henry IV as his 'kindred spirit' as he ''exiled himself then came back and annihilated everyone and everything''.Lovely.That 'common touch' on display.

    And of course let's not forget that his other half is becoming blacker by the week in order for the Ginger one to claim racism in everything said for the benefit of the Woke nuiscances.Tiresome.

    We now live in an age of stunning mediocrity where halfwits get exhausted if they have to speak in complete sentences yet are highly paid 'influencers' pushing agendas for pounds or dollars. Everyone is about the reaction now. It's showtime ( Truman -style)There's even youtube channels ''see me react to...' . What ? . Who wants to film themselves reacting to hearing a song or news to impress the world ? But these wolves hunger for scandal and angst.Harry knows that...his 'team' told him...he knows his audience laps this BS up..welcome to the disturbing downward spiral of the first celebrity royal..

    Harry is of his time.His C- lister wife is of the age.Together they're a charity shop Edward and Mrs Simpson.Both weird, and both disloyal to their family and the people who made them privileged millionaires. They never go deep as they don't need to.Their target audience panic away from the shallows. This particular 'dumbagraphic' ( i made that word up but you can borrow as needed Ros x ) will still wave their flags. Not me . I have a headache. I refuse to succumb to ginger vitus..

    Ziggy ( Happy New Year Ros xoxox )

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello Ziggy how lovely to 'see' you and thank you for replying. I never get replies these days :(, I kind of feel like I am calling occupants of interplanetary craft, not sure if anyone is hearing me, lol. Matters not, I vowed to continue writing my blog even if I had only one reader left, and that reader may be you ha ha.

    I agree with many of your sentiments on the 'woke' front, bizarrely and crazily I am finding myself agreeing with right wing nutters and watching GB News, Gawd 'elp me.

    I don't however agree with you on today's noveau riche (sp), influencers and people making money with bizarre talents, cute mutts and that all important likeability factor. In fact I vehemently disagree with you! This is the first time in history that working class people have had opportunities to make loads of dosch! No pinning all hopes on the football pools. The way I see it, they now have an equal playing field, going to Eton and inheriting a country pile does not give Lord Snooties and second sons the privileges they are accustomed to. The newly rich are finding ways and means of making money that the old elite never even dreamt of. I think these are exciting and innovative times Ziggy, a brave new world.

    I am continually blown away by the fact that I can google anything! I remember sitting in libraries studying multiple reference books and indeed carrying several of them home. I am not moaning here, I have always loved libraries. But it is amazing that I can find anything from how to puree a parsnip to creating an elaborate updo! Currently watching Marie Antoinette :)

    I think all these vloggers who take the time and trouble to share their expertise with the world are wonderful! I also love those vloggers who take us along on their travels to parts of the world we can only dream of. So too those travel vloggers who taste all the exotic local foods and mix in the real world of those far
    away places, I feel as though I am travelling along with them. Then there are the history buffs who visit castles and stately homes, narrating the history as they go. I could go on and on, as you can see, I am glad to be living in these times.

    If I were a historian, I would say the axis of the earth is shifting, quite rapidly in fact - the change being that the working classes are creating wealth much faster than the established elite. The Stephen Colbert show is a great example. Prior to Prince Harry appearing on stage, SC had set up costumed guards with trumpets backstage to blow a fanfare as the Prince arrived. SC brushed Harry aside and pointed out they were for Tom Hanks. Genius burn. Also a good example for H that in the US, an A lister tops a Prince in the hierarchy.
    (this continues, just grabbing a cuppa)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am actually feeling a little sad for Harry, he is with a woman who I think is literally tormenting him. He should have gotten with (very American lol) that 'Frozen' princess, who understands the healing of 'let it go'. Poor Harry, who is not very bright, has been programmed to discuss 'unconscious bias' which he clearly doesn't understand. I'm not knocking him, no-one does. Another term for it, is baloney. Used by those suffering from chronic victimhood looking for things to be affronted by.

      It is strange how our opinions on the monarchy change as we age. In my youth I was always puzzled by the mystique and soap opera of watching the characters and for me, the fashions. Puzzlement best describes my thoughts at that time, but I wasn't an anti. I didn't agree that our castles and monuments were enough to keep the tourist trade flourishing. Several years ago, I had a 'lightbulb' or watershed moment as I watched the very elderly Queen visited the kids who had been injured in the Arianna Grande bomb in Manchester. I was deeply touched by the expressions on their faces and the faces of the nursing staff who were taking care of them. It hit me at that moment, how much good that sweet old lady was doing in the aftermath of such a tragedy. She was worth her weight in gold.

      But I have waffled, as I often do. Hmm dumbographic. I don't love it. Whilst I agree with the snobbery that our generation had a more in depth education, we had to do it all manually, lol, the young generation are err, differently educated. That is they will never be called upon to explain Pythagorus's theorem (neither have I tbh, not that I could ha ha). It is a different world. All the old traditional working class jobs have gone. The only growth industry is the NHS and the care industry. We are living longer, many of us past our time. We need a government that will create new industries, new ways in which to create wealth and comfort for all. So a great big yes from me, to all those creatives and influencers who have found ways to use the internet and social media to earn a living.
      suggest pumping money into science and technology, the Leisure industry and the Arts. The old presbyterian values of scrubbing your doorstep every day have gone and we don't need to break rocks in order to feel we have put in a hard day's work.

      Delete

    2. I am not sure I agree with the philosophy of going to bed with a mind improving book a la Bertie Wooster, when flicking through Youtube is much more fun! More and more do I agree with the words of your felllow Liverpudlian John Lennon, who said, not verbatim, the purpose of life is to have fun.

      I have high hopes for the next generation, they have information not
      available to our generation, literally at their fingertips. Imagine how much knowledge we could have crammed into our young, sponge like brains if we had had google! Of course there will always be a percentage of the population who's life's goals will be ginormous boobs or a Ferrari, that is all part of 'it is as it is'. But I believe that most young people with the education they are getting, will create a better world. We were part of a world where news and information were fed to us through the mass media. Aunty Beeb especially. We were taught to be deferential to the Queen, politicians etc. We were, unknowingly, being indoctrinated into a culture of obedient, law abiding citizens who doffed our caps and stood up for the National Anthem when we went to the pictures. We have lived our lives by the dominant ideology, the codes and conventions that existed at that time.

      Now we receive news from every perspective, often from eye witnesses who are on the spot. The masses can no longer be influenced by edited and biased news, it is all out there for us to make our own judgement. I would love to be at a dinner table with Voltaire, Maximillian Robespierre, Charles Dickins, Che Guevara and Charlie Chaplin. Actually Mary Wollstonecraft too, to represent the feminists.

      tbc


      Some might say, national service enthusiasts for example, that we were 'better' then. But were we? From my own perspective, it took me decades to understand institutional cruelty, how and why it occurred.

      Delete
  5. Hi, "Björn Again" here!
    I’m reading your blog now and then Rosalinda, but I haven’t had time to comment, but here are some thoughts with regards to your view on the British monarchy, since you brought it up as a subject of discussion some weeks ago.

    Harry and Meghan can be said to lead a rather normal life judged by Hollywood standards. Self-assertion seems to be their essential driving force and through their actions we have now learned who they rteally are deep inside, that is, heartless in mind and soulless in judgement.

    If we take the “Hollywood Syndrome” (my own expression) under consideration, which applies to most privileged people, we’ve learned that it for many will often end in lawsuits to left and right and it’s always about money, fame and power and I believe, as you and Ziggy imply, that something similar may happen to H&M. It’s “the Way of All Flesh”, so to speak.

    As I see things Rosalinda, Meghan couldn’t take her Cinderella dream and the glamourous Hollywood life style to Buckingham Palace, but through Harry’s ”authorship”, she now at least gets a chance to bring BP to Hollywood instead, but who across the pond sincerely cares about them anymore.

    Soon they’ll be forgotten and so will “Le Petit Prince”, despite having behaved in an “unbecoming” manner on Jeffrey Epstein’s love island at some point of time in the past. Perhaps he will be remembered for risking his life while defending an inhabited rock in the Atlantic Ocean. Just my guess. Anyway, the Queen at that time must’ve been mighty proud of him, but what about Harry. What will he be remembered for? His novels about “the happy few” in our society? We aren’t really interested, are we, but just a little bit amused?

    Björn

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Rosalinda
    (a a possible topic to discuss with regards to free speech)
    The coronation of King Charles in all its glory, but beyond all the glitz and glamor there are serious topics to discuss, one of which is the unjust imprisonment of Julian Assange.

    Assange now asks King Charles to pay him a visit. This is an extract from the letter he wrote to King Charles. What is your view on this case Rosalinda, and Ziggy if you’re still around, what is your take on it???

    “I implore you, King Charles, to visit His Majesty's Prison Belmarsh, for it is an honour befitting a king. As you embark upon your reign, may you always remember the words of the King James Bible: 'Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy', says Julian Assange in a letter to the King.

    Björn

    ReplyDelete