Well Sonia has definitely upped the ante by several notches, in fact, another turn of the screw and several heads might explode.
I see the other place have once again responded with shock, horror and outrage at the proactive steps Sonia is taking to bring the truth about this case to the public's attention. Chief Chinless Wonder and his entourage would prefer to spend another 7+ years discussing one theory within the moderated confines of a right wing forum that drives anyone away who doesn't agree with the lunacy of its leader.
Not only is it all going horribly wrong for the McCanns, it is also going horribly wrong for Mr. Bennett. He wanted to be the Christian Soldier leading the search for (his) truth, he is the one who has suffered the most at the hands of the McCanns (even though he brought it all on himself) and he's the one who deserves the accolades. That he is being overtaken by a strong, attractive, woman in make up and heels with, God forbid, painted nails, must be driving him insane, and the amount of new characters appearing on his forum to back him up, confirms it.
I'm completely baffled as to what CCW and his gang are hoping to achieve and how exactly they are hoping to achieve it. They have written off Sky News forever more on principle. Err, OK, but does that include the entire Murdoch news empire? In which case, Bennett or indeed any of them, can never speak to Sky, The Times, The Sun etc. Not really conducive to a group seeking to get the truth out there because if they choose to stand by their principles, there isn't a single news agency they can talk to, they can only talk to each other, if their consciences are to remain clear.
But the frenzy Bennett finds himself in, isn't just confined to the lovely Sonia, there is also an attractive strong woman now leading Operation Grange and it looks as though an ASW is about to deny the McCanns their next Million pound payout. For Tony, it all started to go wrong when they let women out of the kitchen.
Can there be any doubts now as to which side Tony is on? Lets look at the evidence:
1. Bennett has completely written off the eye witness evidence of the Smith family for reasons listed in blue on 75% of the pages of Jill Havern's forum.
2. Bennett MUST convince the world, the first arguido, Robert Murat is responsible for Madeleine's disappearance because he had some dodgy porn on his computer. Ergo, RM is linked to an international paedophile ring that leads right to the heart of the British establishment, pop stars, writers, journos and indeed every other household as the world is full of sexual deviants. His thinking in that runs pretty much along the same lines as chief McCann supporter Jim Gamble.
3. His hijacking of the Richard T. Hall's videos, to purport his own theory of Robert Murat's involvement, and loony reasons why the Smith family made up their sighting on the night of 3rd May.
4. His vigorous opposition to anyone attempting to get the truth out into the public domain. His attacks on Sonia Poulton are no different to the attacks on Stop the Myths (the rabid McCann supporters site) and it is difficult to tell which pages are from CMoMM and which are from STM's - they sing in harmony and their goal is to destroy Sonia whatever the cost. They won't succeed, the truth is coming out whether they like it or not.
5. In the aftermath of the 'McCanns will lose Libel trial' headlines, Bennett opens up a discussion about Portugal's legal system and corruption.
6. In view of the revelations of the past year or so (death in the apartment, digging for a body etc) why is Bennett still paying the McCanns £100+ per month and allowing their 'gagging' of him to stand? His Freedom of Speech is at present severely curtailed - he is in a 'prison' that would send most writers and campaigners insane, yet he doesn't protest?
I am still saying to myself, no, its not possible, he couldn't have turned, but I met him once several years ago and came away with the memory of him saying he wasn't 100% sure the McCanns were involved. I was alarmed by this because for myself, I couldn't and wouldn't criticise the parents of a missing child unless I was 100% convinced of their involvement. In retrospect, he may have been with the McCanns from the start. He has certainly helped to keep them in the news with his ill timed outrageous publicity stunts.
In the meanwhile, to Sonia, I would say 'You Go Girlfriend', finally this case is going from being discussed behind closed doors to causing media waves on twitter. The MSM are not only taking notice of 'anti' groups, they are actually publishing stories that are unfavourable to the McCanns. And there is good reason for this. They are getting their information from a credible source! Tony Bennett caused untold damage to the 'anti' cause, his extremist views and behaviour antagonised every media outlet he approached, and worse he was portrayed as representing all of us. To all accounts he brought down the 3 Arguidoes, the 'first' and biggest anti McCann forum after Clarence had the Mirror discussions blocked. Bennett was playing right into the hands of the McCann media monitors, or he was dancing to their tune? Which was it?
In any event, in all these years, unfortunately for the McCanns they have never been able to produce a 'villain' - that is a leader of the anti's in the same vein as nasty BNP leader Nick Griffin, an extremist they could name and shame and put on talk shows to stir the populace up into a frenzy. They must refer to their enemies as obscure, faceless, nobody's hiding away in their bedrooms and pitchforking among themselves. The best they could come up with was a harmless, middle aged lady with 353 followers on twitter, and once they took her out all that was left was the remnants of the Madeleine Foundation, that is Mr. Bennett, and he is the only one left on pro McCann dossier collecting site Exposing the Myths too.
Of course, Bennett has never cut the mustard as the villain of piece, as he instantly comes across as one of those barmy prophets of doom who used to wear bowler hats and stand on orange boxes in Hyde Park. He was never going to face Paxman, or attract an audience bigger than 100 pigeons and a bemused office worker eating his sarnies.
Sonia Poulton on the other hand has a big audience, and quite rightly. She is attractive, intelligent, erudite and has her finger on the pulse of current and popular culture - and she presents the news and information in a format that is instantly accessible to EVERY viewer. And that is what gives her the edge. She is able to read and digest the news then pick out the key points so the viewer and reader doesn't have to. We are grateful for this, most of don't have the time or inclination to wade through reams of documents underlined in blue and we don't want them dictated to us from a pulpit.
But most of all Mr. Bennett, and I know you will read this. Sonia is real. She has a past, she is human, that doesn't make her a worse person, it makes her a better one, because she can empathise with the people she is reporting the news to, and they can empathise with her. Very few can empathise with those up there on the moral high ground Mr. Bennett, and whilst you may have secured your place on the right hand side of the Good Lord, the rest of us prefer to party on the living side of life's journey with as many sins of the flesh as we can before the arthritis kicks in. I hasten to add, I have no idea what Bennett are accusing Sonia of, I stopped reading his nonsense a long time ago, but I know its sins of the flesh that worry him most of all.