Wednesday, 8 October 2014

LET BRENDA DEFEND HERSELF

You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.  Abraham Lincoln


So the mainstream media are now labelling Brenda Leyland as mentally unstable, a conspiracy theorist with a fixation on the parents of a missing child.  She wasn't.  She was a well educated, refined lady, a popular and active member of her community and loved by those who knew her. 

Labelling Brenda and indeed all of us as conspiracy loons, the MSM can continue to ignore us and promote the agenda that Gerry and Kate McCann are the victims of a Portuguese conspiracy and a small underclass envious of the parents detached house and room for a pony. 

But lets deal first with the anti McCann conspiracy, involved are all those who do not believe that Madeleine was abducted, so as conspiracies go, its a pretty big group. 

Are our beliefs based on myths and rumours? No, they are based on the official Portuguese police files released after the case was shelved, wherein the Attorney General stated that Kate and Gerry McCann failed to prove their innocence.  He did not clear them, as stated over and over again by every UK media outlet, the case was shelved because the McCanns and their friends refused to co-operate with the investigation. 

We are right to ask questions.  The crime occurred in Portugal, so why are Scotland Yard investigating it? Are they saying, we don't accept your sardine munching findings, so we will come up with better ones ourselves, ta very much. Whatever Scotland Yard are doing, it cannot end in prosecution, they cannot drag Portuguese citizens over to the UK to put in an Old Baily dock for a crime committed in Portugal. So why are Scotland Yard investigating a crime in another country?  To take this a wee bit further, can all UK citizens accused of crimes abroad expect the same treatment if they too don't like the conclusions of the host nation?

FACTS. 

There is no evidence whatsoever to support the abduction story. 

Kate and Gerry McCann and their friends did not search on the night Madeleine went missing, they stayed in the apartment phoning everyone on their contact lists. 

Despite their daughter being 'taken in the night', the McCanns put their twins in the resort crèche the following day - 4th May.

Kate refused to answer 48 police questions

Most damning of all, specialist blood and cadaver dogs, trained by Scotland Yard, detected blood and the odour of cadaver in the McCanns' apartment, the hire car and items belonging to Kate McCann.  A child is missing so who died in 5A?

In the majority of cases where a child is claimed to have been abducted, the parents have been involved, that is a fact.  The McCanns are not even unusual in their behaviour, Youtube is full of 'grieving parents' giving interviews, who have later been discovered to have killed the child themselves.  The McCanns are unusual because they have had so much support from the government and the media.

It is condescending and patronising of those journalists, who have clearly done no research whatsoever, to label people such as Brenda Leyland a conspiracy loon on the basis that she was only a member of the public and didn't know what she was talking about.  Well news flash.  Brenda knew exactly what she was talking about, and sure as eggs is eggs, Martin Brunt knew it too. 

If a journalist campaigns for a cause he/she believes in passionately, they are feted as heroes and presented with honours, accolades and awards.  If a member of public acts similarly, they are obviously mentally unstable. 

Well those who speak out are the movers and the shakers of this world - whatever walk of life they come from, and Brenda's passion was just as worthy as those with 'Reporter' stamped on their passport.  She was fighting for justice for the forgotten child in all this, Madeleine McCann. Her 4000+ tweets were a credit to her persistence, just what is it going to take for someone to stop the madness of the McCann scam.  One crime has led to hundreds, and now it is taken a very sinister turn indeed.  It can only get worse, unless someone out there has the guts to say, enough is enough. 

Martin Brunt knew immediately that Brenda Leyland was a nice, decent woman and probably wondered himself what the feck he was doing.  Even under extreme duress, she was well mannered and kindly invited Martin and the crew into her home.  I know Martin Brunt is feeling like shit right now, but he could go some way to putting this right, by revealing the full interview, the one in which she explained why she was campaigning  and give her an opportunity to clear her name. 

 




44 comments:

  1. I really don't think Brunt has the balls to publish the whole interview which surely won't toe the party line. I am sure he is more interested in keeping his well paid job and paying in to his pension. He will push this tragedy to the back of his mind and carry on business as usual. Sad but true.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "If a journalist campaigns for a cause he/she believes in passionately, they are feted as heroes and presented with honours, accolades and awards. If a member of public acts similarly, they are obviously mentally unstable."

    There is a huge difference between campaigning for a cause and sending thousands of vitrious twitters under an anonymous avatar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, she didn't just post comments under a twitter pseudonym, she also openly posted her opinions under her full name and was therefore an easy target. The headlines mentioned death threats. Brenda Leyland didn't make any death threats, or indeed anything that could possibly be construed as a threat. By publishing tweets that were not made by her, Sky and the rest of the media, hoodwinked the public into believing she did.

      Delete
    2. @6.30Can you tell me why KM refused to answer questions from the police.

      Delete
    3. Please explain why KM and GM did not look for their missing child when she went missing on the 3rd may 2007.

      Delete
    4. She was only outed as the owner of the twitter account last week. Therefore, she sent nearly all of the thousands of tweets from behind the veil of anonymity - do you think that that is the behaviour of a hero or someone who should be presented with honours, accolades and awards?

      Delete
    5. She's wasn't the only one to use a pseudonym, eh Janet Marie.

      Delete
    6. Have you heard of Eddie and Keela ?
      You can find them on you tube.

      Delete
    7. What's your name @09.34 given that you disapprove of anonymity?

      She didn't "send" tweets. She published them to a tiny number of followers. Lots of people do it. It doesn't deserve honour and awards, but nor does it deserve public humiliation, lies and scapegoating. Do you think that's what she deserved?

      Delete
    8. @9.34 why did the McC,s tell the world their missing daughter had an eye defect, thereby risking her life, only to play the eye defect down years later?

      Delete
  3. 6;30 Absolutely right Kate/Gerry just the same as there is a huge difference between "a mistake" and you leaving your siblings night after night whilst you went out drinking with your friends. And there is an even huger difference between the propaganda in the British Media who promote your lies and the truth about Madeleine's demise.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You lost all credibility at "we don't accept your sardine munching findings,"

    Ridiculous woman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, that is a quote a British journalist wrote about the PJ.

      Delete
    2. Daily Mirror 19.10.07

      Oh, up yours, señor
      Tony Parsons

      Portugal's ambassador to Britain, Senor Antonio Santana Carlos, says that the Madeleine McCann case has seriously damaged relations between the two countries. Well, whose fault is that?

      It is the fault of the spectacularly stupid, cruel Portuguese police. I have never much cared for the convention of calling cops "pigs" or "filth", but I am happy to make an exception.

      They have tried to cover their humiliation at coming nowhere close to finding that stolen child by fitting up her parents.

      The decline in relations is also the fault of the appalling Portuguese media, happy to print any piece of poisonous trash spoon-fed to them by "police sources" treating the abduction of a small child as light entertainment.

      And the Portuguese public must also take their share of the blame. The sight of locals jeering at Kate McCann as she went in for questioning made me feel as though these leering bumpkins were not from another country, but another planet.

      And the good ambassador can also be blamed for the decline in relations.

      When he should be exercising a little diplomacy, he huffs and he puffs about the McCanns' tragic decision to leave their children sleeping alone on the night Madeleine was stolen.

      "In Portugal we have the concept of a nuclear family," sniffs Senor Carlos. "That the families all live together."

      They made a mistake, ambassador. Their lives have been wrecked. That is punishment enough, without your asinine, unwanted comments.

      And I would respectfully suggest that in future, if you can't say something constructive about the disappearance of little Madeleine, then you just keep your stupid, sardine-munching mouth shut.

      *

      Note: The Press Complaints Commission received 485 complaints over this piece by Tony Parsons, more than any other piece in 2007.

      Delete
  5. Brenda Leyland was menaced,hunted and hounded to death by the rat faced degenerate Martin Brunt (to paraphrase Blacksmith) and in her memory we will not wilt in the pursuit of justice for MBM.
    Lost credibility has been monopolised by Team McBullshit and you are the ridiculous one here.
    Read Dr Gaspar statements .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, but Brenda Leyland menaced, hunted and hounded during the last four years.

      Delete
    2. why was Gerry feeling uplifted ,according to his mother, when the fund was set up two weeks after his daughter went awol.

      Delete
    3. Why did Gerry dismiss Mrs Fenn at 10.30 on the night of the 3rd may 2007 rather than ask if she had seen his child?His daughter who had gone missing moments earlier.You are asking us to believe this is the behavior of an innocent father?

      Delete
    4. And what have the McCann shills being doing for the past 7 years in covering up for MBM's parents in their "loss" of their child (something like leaving her on a bus and getting off without her so it seems), yet everyone else has had to suffer because the McCanns are so "innocent" in all of this that everyone is to blame for the loss of MBM but not themselves.

      Have you even read the disgusting vitriol that the McCann "supporters" have spewed out to all and sundry for the pasts 7 years and the McCanns have pretended not to know anything about it

      Delete
    5. OFCOM complaints have now gone to well over 100 about Brunt and Sky and their biased one sided nonsense of news. I too have complained and written to other agencies about them, Gamble and GM being complicit in Brenda's sad and unwarranted death. More people need to complain as Brenda must not have died in vein.

      Delete
    6. 09:40 - is that you Brunty, thought you were told to lie low for while. As someone else said finding it hard to think of something that rhymes with Brunt...

      Delete
  6. Do you really think her dead will change anything?
    Exposing and jailing the ones who might turned her over the edge?
    Or even murder ..can and will be proved?
    Really?
    Get the facts..

    From the first day the Media adopted te Mccann story.
    And will be..
    Dont murder the story..
    It is a cheap one, but it sellls...
    End

    ReplyDelete
  7. On 11th November 2013 Brenda wrote:

    "I would also hope if I were to die in odd circumstances people would Q and not just accept the first version"

    On 2nd Dec 2013 she wrote

    "you did us proud, go get 'em, we have all got your back"

    She was a gutsy woman who was articulate and reasonable in discussion. I'm pretty sure Martin Brunt knew it and it will be on his conscience for the rest of his days.

    As Brenda frequently said, aren't we all after the same thing, finding out what happened to Madeleine? Why have the media morphed it into the parents cause instead?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have just been reading a lot of the official police files. Interesting reading to say the least.
    Can someone familiar with the facts answer this.. it appears from the files that Kate went back to the apartment in a strop with Gerry on a previous night, and this could be the night that Madeleine crying "Daddy Daddy" was overheard..
    Q: Was Madeleine seen, by any independent witness not the tapas lot, between the time of the "daddy daddy" cries and the night of the disappearance?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I doubt martin brunt has a conscience. Murdochs lackey. We also know now that Brenda received death threats.
    @mrsfeex as I see it, the McCann media fest is only one aspect of the octopus.

    murphy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ Murphy.
      Probaly more the loch ness monster..
      I dont think this case (mccann) can or will be solved.
      But speculation sells.
      There was no need to mention what the 'troll' had for a religion, or her personal life spin out.
      Ot interviewing her neighbours.
      If she broke the law, they had to go to the police.
      Even bad criminals are not exposed/broadcasted like that.

      But I dont think it will get better.
      Money is a relgion to.

      Delete
  10. I see the McFraud's are now spinning the 'good' that social media brings in informing the masses. Apart from the bit that talks about the PJfiles and Sniffer Dogs!

    ReplyDelete
  11. If you haven't already done so, take a look at http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/ you will find a lot of answers.

    ReplyDelete
  12. There's no proof that there were any independent witnesses, check the passports and start from there.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Will be grateful if people could cast a vote on my "Do you believe Madeleine McCann was abducted? Poll http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=54347020e4b09149347e290f

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Most damning of all, specialist blood and cadaver dogs, trained by Scotland Yard, detected blood and the odour of cadaver in the McCanns' apartment, the hire car and items belonging to Kate McCann."

    The problem with that is that Cadaver dogs cannot tell the difference between dead pigs and dead humans. In fact, they are trained on both due to the similar chemicals found in dead pigs and humans. So they are great if your searching for a buried body in a wood, but in a rented appartment or hire car, where people may have eaten or carried pork, ham etc, the dogs will always react.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmm, OK, so why did the McCanns have a dead pig behind their sofa? Or indeed, why would they put a dead pig in their wardrobe, and then 3 weeks later transport it in their hire car?

      And as for reacting to people who have eaten or carried pork, ham etc, you cannot be serious! We know Gerry was partial to a 'full English', but chances are, so were most of the holidaymakers. Unless the entire holiday compound was made up of strict muslims, the dogs would have been alerting everywhere.

      And who carries pork, ham etc? Unless of course, Warners' kitchens had their meat delivered via the guests apartments? Most people keep meat products in the fridge, not in their pockets and almost never behind the sofa or in the wardrobe.

      Delete
    2. Ha! Is that the excuse now? Pork?! Ha ha ha! Is that the best rebuttal they have to the damning dog evidence? FYI the dogs are trained with a whole pig cadaver not sliced ham and they can tell the difference so the shills will need to come up with a reason why the MCs were hiding a dead pig in the wardrobe. Look forward to that one!

      Delete
    3. Any trace of salami, pork or cured ham will do to set the dogs off. That is dead pig. Dogs do not know the difference between a whole pig or a part of a pig.

      The dogs are trained but cannot tell the difference between dead pig or dead human. If you don't believe me check just google "cadaver dogs pigs"

      "Hmm, OK, so why did the McCanns have a dead pig behind their sofa? Or indeed, why would they put a dead pig in their wardrobe, and then 3 weeks later transport it in their hire car?"

      So you really think that the McCanns could have smuggled their child into a hire car in front of police and journalists and then managed to bury her, undiscovered, in terrain that they are unfamiliar with? A place that remains undiscovered?

      Delete
    4. Rosalinda, the dogs only searched the McCann's appartment - check the records - the portuguese police were too quick to jump on the dog's reactions and, themselves, jump to conclusions. Why do you think that no cjharges have been brought against the McCanns? The dogs are excellent at finding bodies but cannot tell the difference between dead pigs - salami, cured ham etc, and dead humans. If you don't believe me just google 'cadaver dogs pigs'

      Delete
    5. You are misinformed. Cadaver dogs do not alert to food products.

      Delete
    6. The best piece of gerryism was his 2year old had developed a taste for sea bass.We are not all idiots
      R.I.P benda Leyland

      Delete
    7. 17:40 read the files and stop being ignorant. The dogs were deployed to areas other than those that were directly linked to the Mc's. They would have also used control sampling. This is how their evidence is deemed tenable in court. Knowledge is power.

      Delete
    8. 17.31

      Who said it was the McCanns who smuggled their dead child into a hire car in front of the press. Don't forget (and I and may of us haven't) that the McCanns had family and friends staying with them while they were off to visit the Pope, Morocco etcl, whilst the whole of the world's press were following them.

      We're not all stupid you know, we can see through anything the McCanns throw at us, "look over there, not here". We've heard it all for the past 7 years and we're sick to death of their BS and taking us for fools.

      Delete
    9. 17.40

      "Rosalinda, the dogs only searched the McCann's appartment - check the records - the portuguese police were too quick to jump on the dog's reactions and, themselves, jump to conclusions. Why do you think that no cjharges have been brought against the McCanns? The dogs are excellent at finding bodies but cannot tell the difference between dead pigs - salami, cured ham etc, and dead humans. If you don't believe me just google 'cadaver dogs pigs' "
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

      Oh, how you wish. You may be in the pockets of the McCanns to diss the forensic dogs at all costs but the rest of us aren't.

      Martin Grimes and his new dogs are now working for the FBI, YES THE FBI, do you think they would take on someone who has dogs that sniff everything from salami to dead bodies. What use would they be? You really are scraping the barrel to protect the McCanns. Are you being paid to spout this nonsense or are you just protecting them out of the goodness of your heart?

      Trying telling the FBI that the dogs will sniff anything from salami to dead bodies, I'm sure they would love to hear your theories on how unreliable the dogs are.

      Delete
  15. She was a well educated, refined lady, a popular and active member of her community and loved by those who knew her.

    She was a nutter like yourself Linda .

    .

    ReplyDelete
  16. @10.41 proof cristobell that you are on the right track. Team McScam seems rattled.

    ReplyDelete