More Myths and Legends of Tony Bennett
Many of you believe TB is a meticulous researcher in the search for the truth regarding MM, but is there evidence to support this?
There is an unrelenting onslaught on the ‘lies’ of the Smith family and the ‘blatant lies’ of Robert Murat. But why doesn’t he ever want you to remember the pernicious campaign waged against RM by the Macs and Tapas 7?
One of TB’s diversions is to analyse every tiny mistake in anything RM has said, such as he forgot to mention he went to the bank, therefore he is party to child abduction. Another is he agreed with the Macs to be the fall guy in exchange for £600,000. Are we really to believe anyone would admit to abducting and killing a child and spending the rest of their life in prison for money? Most would think it ludicrous.
But there is abundant evidence the Macs and Tapas 7 deliberately chose Murat as their scapegoat, but this is not considered.
TB never fails to repeat the story again and again that JT, RO, FP, ROB, all changed their minds about their identification of Murat at the end of 2007.
You will note that recently Richard D Hall made several DVD’s, entitled “Buried By the Mainstream Media” in which much valuable insights and information was placed in the public domain, but then Hall reduces his credibility to zero by quoting facts straight from the myths book of Bennett. Among these myths are that both Murat and Gerry’s phones were switched off for the same 32 hours.
Total tosh, a TB myth.
When he first wrote this on CMOMM, Friday 8 January 2010, TB said “here is a little known fact that needs more public exposure”. Somebody had the audacity to reply, “the reason it is a little known fact, is because it’s not true”
Information followed from the PJ and phone companies proving Gerry’s phone was switched on but as usual TB continued with his lies.
No discussion, it is not permitted.
Hall then quotes the fact that by the end of 2007 the Tapas group were all singing from the same hymn sheet and that they now knew it was not Murat they saw that night.
TB started this myth on JH, that by the end of 2007 all the Tapas had changed their stories it was not Murat they saw. TB repeats this time and time again and people actually believe it.
As a researcher, he even investigated a company formed by Martin Smith in 1991, as in his opinion, it had relevance to Madeleine, 16 years later,this is astonishing.
So if TB is right, and the Tapas all retracted their identification of Murat, at the end of 2007, how does Bennett explain their rogatory statements, given to the Leicestershire Police in April 2008 and Kate’s book “madeleine” in 2011.
TB always tries to minimise their id of Murat saying simply, they were mistaken.
Now read the 2008 statements of Fiona Payne and Rachael Oldfield, where they state “the man came up to me, shook me by the hand and said I am Robert Murat”.
How can this be a mistake? It is a clear attempt by them to wrongly blame and implicate Murat. This is a criminal offence in Portugal, called calumny and is punishable by a jail sentence, In the UK it is called Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.
Does Kate in her 2011 book, say they were mistaken.
No, she does not.
Can Bennett produce any police statement, where they have retracted their id of Murat?
No, he cannot.
As usual he has made it up as Bennett wants you to look anywhere except at the Macs and Tapas 7.
You need to ask him why?
He has been told many times he was wrong but did he recheck his facts?
No, he did not.
Now he is using Hall to peddle his nonsense. How is this helping to discover the truth by undermining a valuable piece of work by RDH?
Payne and Oldfield committed a criminal conspiracy in order to implicate Murat TB does not want anyone looking there, hence his deceit.
This id holds the key to the whole mystery. Why did they deliberately lie? And how they came to do so. It was not a mistake, remember “he came up to me, shook me by the hand and said I am Robert Murat”
Where in all of Bennetts copious work does it come up for discussion?
If any Police force needs a point to start, here is positive proof of a criminal offence. Why has it been ignored?
I am surprised Bennetts research has not pointed out of the three separate groups of the Tapas 7, one each has certainly committed a criminal offence, perhaps this is a reason for a pact of silence.
But of course, in Bennett world, they never gave these statements. In ROB’s rogatory statement in April 2008, ROB states “Murat that night broke up a fracas with some English and the GNR.
Murat told him he had a daughter of the same age, mentioned his wife was in Norfolk with his daughter. Rachel and Fiona have vehement views on Murat and said he was a translator for the British Police”.
They sure meant to leave ‘no stone unturned’ in setting Murat up.
Murat has been thoroughly investigated by the British and Portuguese Police and nothing has been found to link him to Madeleine but Bennett insists he will continue to dissect Murat’s school life, business life, social life, present wife, ex wife and on and on and on.
Of Martin Smith he examines in such detail the lives of Smiths fellow company directors, from years ago as having relevance. Smiths daughter, 12 at the time, has her school work examined in great detail and is labelled a liar on numerous occasions.
But of two women who by their own police statements, have committed a criminal offence, which has a direct bearing on the mystery of Madeleine McCann, nothing, absolutely nothing.
Either Bennett is the worst researcher ever, or he has been given an agenda not to draw any attention to the stitch up of Robert Murat by the Macs and their friends.
Draw your own conclusions.
This is a brief resume (sorry Cristobell) on one aspect of Bennetts misinformation misdirection half truths and lies and there is much much more. The myths and legends of TB could run and run.
Many thanks to Cristobell for her bravery in allowing another point of view to have an airing.